- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@brightonargus
All the latest news and view from the Argus
@theargusoffers
The latest offers and competitions from the Argus
@theargusguide
The best events in Brighton, Hove and Sussex
@ArgusMagazine
Features, interviews, TV, travel and lifestyle from the Argus
- Find us on Facebook
The Argus
The Argus - news, sport and leisure for Brighton, Hove and Sussex
The Argus Offers and Competitions
Keep up to date with all the offers, events and competitions from the Argus
Sussex hunt drops court case against activists (From The Argus)
Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
Sussex hunt drops court case against activists
6:00pm Thursday 16th July 2009 in News By Samuel Underwood
Two wildlife campaigners who waged a lengthy war against fox hunting have seen a court case against them dropped.
Husband and wife Simon and Jaine Wild, from Bognor, faced High Court action to ban them and other hunt monitors from large areas of West Sussex.
More than 80 landowners backed the Crawley and Horsham Hunt’s bid to block the West Sussex Wildlife Protection Group and the Wilds from about 10,000 acres of land.
But the claimants have now withdrawn the proceedings and have agreed to pay almost all the defence costs, expected to be in excess of £60,000.
The Wilds' solicitor, Victoria Pogge von Strandmann, of Fisher Meredith Solicitors, said the hunt dropped the case after unsuccessfully applying for an interim injunction on July 15 last year.
She said it was then adjourned at the claimants’ request after two aborted trials in which the judge dismissed two of the grounds for it, nuisance and trespass, because they had “fundamental defects”.
That limited the claim to one of harassment, which Mrs Wild and the other defendants denied.
Antony Sandeman, joint-master of the hunt, claimed that the protesters had changed their behaviour since the case was brought, rendering it pointless.
He said: “The hunt has never sought to stop any legitimate scrutiny of its activities and as a result of the action the behaviour of activists has changed out of all recognition.
“We will, however, be continuing to monitor the behaviour of activists.”
Mr and Mrs Wild denied that she or her husband had altered their tactics in hunt monitoring and that their scrutiny would continue in the future.
Comments(8)
Osama bin there
says...
7:23pm Thu 16 Jul 09
So good news, as far as I'm concerned. And even better that it's going to cost the 'hunters' serious dosh.
Ha. ha.
TheInsider
says...
7:32pm Thu 16 Jul 09
For Every Sprinkle I Find
says...
7:35pm Thu 16 Jul 09
So to take people to court over what they're doing (which is legal) when what they're trying to do is to stop toffs breaking the law in the first place......
The law is there, no-one acts on it. Just ONCE, I want the police to go to a hunt and arrest EVERY SINGLE TOFF and give them ALL a Criminal Record.
stan bailey
says...
10:23pm Thu 16 Jul 09
Osama bin there wrote:I usually greatly admire your intelligence, however people who hunt are usually quite humble with regard to their wealth.
I hate professional agitators, but even more I hate the toffs that think that hunting a fox to death is a sport.
So good news, as far as I'm concerned. And even better that it's going to cost the 'hunters' serious dosh.
Ha. ha.
What would do if you had a rat in your house poison it?
Poison is a very cruel death, it takes days
Andre Spooner
says...
1:58pm Fri 17 Jul 09
I love to ride my horse all around town, and never! Never have I been tempted to stick a blade into a passing bull, or to hack a wolf to death with a rusty blade. Spooner touches the earth lightly!
Wow, my security word was "death-of-elk-by-fir
ing-squad"!
HOW SYMBOLIC.
thensx
says...
12:17pm Sat 18 Jul 09
The whole Hunting with Dogs Bill was a vindictive piece of class-war from a failed Government. As I recall it was Prescott's baby and like everything else he did it was a monumental failure. Hunt membership has gone up since this legislation was introduced, not down.
Maggie H
says...
11:09am Mon 20 Jul 09
ntimidation and illegal hunting they had to drop the case. They thought we would just walk away and let them get on with their disgusting and cruel hobby. If the Cruelly & Horsham hunt are legal, why are the hunt meets shrouded in secrecy ? Why so many hunt thug stewards? They even stopped wearing the red coats so we couldn't see them in the woods last season. Pathetic, rediculous and cruel people. You should be ashamed of yourselves.
jo w says...
7:15pm Thu 16 Jul 09