Report this comment
  • "
    supergus wrote:
    he could have been a peadophile if any1 on here is a decent parent then they will agree with what they did and stop him taking photos he was innocent but they couldnt take that risk simple theres no argument what so ever
    Sooo.... it's ok to stop people taking pictures in public, just in case??!!! No matter what they're of? If I take a picture of my mates on the beach and there's kids in the background should I be arrested and questioned??

    He was just photographing christmas lights on an open public high street. He was blatantly doing it, he wasn't hiding to get some seedy little pictures. There aren't even any kids in the shot FFS?

    If you were really that concerned about safety then surely you'd prefer the plastic plod to be doing some real work catching people who are actually comitting crimes, instead of wasting time harrassing innocents? I know I would."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory

  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

Brighton photographer stopped for taking 'terror' festive lights photos

10:33am Tuesday 1st December 2009 in News By Emily Walker, Chief Reporter

O SANTA BIN LADEN? Andrew White O SANTA BIN LADEN? Andrew White

A photographer wanted to capture images of Christmas lights – but ended up having his details recorded under anti-terror laws.

Andrew White, 33, from Kemp Town, Brighton, was taking snaps of the decorations in Burgess Hill town centre when two Police Community Support Officers started following him as he walked to work.

The two female PCSOs then stopped him and asked why he had been taking pictures and if he was a professional photographer.

When he asked why they wanted to know, the PCSOs told him it was to do with counter-terrorism legislation and demanded his personal details, including his name and address.

Mr White said: “I had nothing to hide so I just provided the details.

“Now I’m concerned about where those details are going to end up.

“I only took one or two photos but even if I had taken more, who are they to say what is too many? I don’t think taking too many photos in the street warrants being considered some kind of terrorist threat, which is what they were suggesting.

“I think the money spent on getting PCSOs to waste my time and harass me in the street could be better spent elsewhere.”

Mr White said the two women PCSOs were polite but they insisted that they had to take his details because they had stopped him.

A Sussex Police spokesman said the officers spoke to Mr White because they were concerned he was taking too many photographs in a busy shopping area.

He said: “They were acting in good faith, balancing individual liberty against the need to ensure public safety.”

Under the 2002 Police Reform Act PCSOs have the power to demand the name and address of a person suspected of committing a criminal offence or for antisocial behaviour.

However, the growing use of this power to stop photographers is being critised.

On Sunday, BBC staff photographer Jeff Overs told the Politics Show how was stopped by PCSOs for taking a picture of a sunset.

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree