Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
2:10pm Friday 29th January 2010 in
Supermarkets charging customers the wrong amount at the tills will not be named and shamed by a council.
Research by Brighton and Hove Trading Standards has shown that every supermarket visited by officials produced an incorrect bill total for a group of items picked off the shelves.
The Argus revealed last month that the worst offending store in the city had almost half of its goods incorrectly priced.
But despite a request under the Freedom of Information Act Brighton and Hove City Council is still refusing to name the guilty shops.
The Argus will now report the local authority to the Information Commissioner in London for withholding information in the public interest.
The Campaign for Freedom of Information criticised the council for failing to provide a valid reason for withholding the information.
A council spokesman said the local authority would not name the offending supermarkets as all those involved had agreed to take action to prevent further mistakes.
Comments(20)
Brightonscouse2
says...
3:08pm Fri 29 Jan 10
chroma wrote:Trading Standards weren't the ones to refuse to name the supermarkets involved, B&H.C.C were. It seems that the council will bend over backwards to accomodate supermarkets.
Absolutely incredible. I have always viewed Trading Standards as being a complete waste of time, and this confirms it. Were this a kebab shop, or a £shop, or a sex shop, they'd have the business name on their press release, but as well know, whether it comes to granting planning permissions for supermarkets the size of small towns, or granting 24hour booze licences, the council will always favour the retail giants. As they say, every little hurts.
Tye
says...
3:28pm Fri 29 Jan 10
Gaz the great
says...
3:34pm Fri 29 Jan 10
keiter
says...
3:57pm Fri 29 Jan 10
Gaz the great
says...
4:20pm Fri 29 Jan 10
keiter wrote:I do-It keeps people in jobs! No teeth or they would publish the information off their own backs, on their website!
I understand this price manipulation was illegal. If so, am I a little simple? What was the point of the exercise?
BringBackGoodGrammar
says...
4:30pm Fri 29 Jan 10
yorkie44
says...
4:57pm Fri 29 Jan 10
Acheron
says...
5:17pm Fri 29 Jan 10
gingersandy38
says...
5:33pm Fri 29 Jan 10
Living in the real world
says...
5:37pm Fri 29 Jan 10
garyc
says...
5:42pm Fri 29 Jan 10
kayotic
says...
6:18pm Fri 29 Jan 10
davyboy
says...
8:08pm Fri 29 Jan 10
another 1
says...
10:24pm Fri 29 Jan 10
kkj
says...
12:01am Sat 30 Jan 10
Christophe Hawtree
says...
9:44am Sat 30 Jan 10
Granny
says...
2:17pm Sat 30 Jan 10
Thumper Hove
says...
3:06pm Sat 30 Jan 10
Gaz the great
says...
3:30pm Sat 30 Jan 10
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for Jobs in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley and more...
Search Now »
Find the right person in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley...
Search Now »
Search for Homes in Brighton, Worthing, Hove, Lewes...
Search Now »
Search for Cars in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley...
Search Now »
chroma says...
2:15pm Fri 29 Jan 10
I have always viewed Trading Standards as being a complete waste of time, and this confirms it. Were this a kebab shop, or a £shop, or a sex shop, they'd have the business name on their press release, but as well know, whether it comes to granting planning permissions for supermarkets the size of small towns, or granting 24hour booze licences, the council will always favour the retail giants.
As they say, every little hurts.