Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
12:30pm Tuesday 16th March 2010 in
Black people in Sussex are almost three times more likely than white people to be stopped and searched by police.
The national equality watchdog said its latest survey of police forces showed some officers still suspected people of crime based on the colour of their skin.
Sussex’s stop and search rates for minorities represent a steady improvement since 2004 and are lower than the national average but still show police in the county are more likely to stop black and Asian people than white.
According to the latest figures from the Equality and Human Rights Commission, one in 53 people were stopped and searched by police in Sussex between April 2007 and March 2008.
One in 21 black people and one in 54 Asians were stopped, compared with one in 62 white people.
Police searched black or Asian people 779 times more than white people – making two “excess” stops every day.
Officers can carry out searches if they have “reasonable suspicion” people are carrying stolen goods, illegal drugs or firearms.
Traffic police can stop cars they suspect contain someone who has committed, or is planning to commit, a crime.
Under anti-hooliganism laws police can also search people they believe may be carrying weapons or planning serious violence, while under the Terrorism Act 2000 they can stop people they suspect are terrorists.
Guidelines for the Police and Criminal Evidence Act read: “A person’s age, race, appearance or the fact the person is known to have a previous conviction cannot be used alone or in combination with each other as the reason for searching that person.
Reasonable suspicion cannot be based on generalisations or stereotypical images of certain groups or categories of people.”
Brian Stockham, chairman of the Sussex Police Federation which represents officers, said the figures for the county were skewed because of a large numbers of visitors each year.
He said analysis of stop and search forms issued in the past had shown up to 50% involved people from elsewhere.
He said: “If there were a disproportion of what we call street intervention that needs explanation, people would be held to account.”
Assistant Chief Constable Nick Wilkinson said the force regularly held meetings with people in the community to monitor use of the powers.
He said: “Stop and search is a valuable tool in keeping people safe when it is based on good intelligence and directed to local neighbourhood hot spots.
Any indication of unfair use is identified, explored, understood and, if needs be, addressed.”
Comments(18)
cheezburger
says...
1:06pm Tue 16 Mar 10
Granny
says...
2:20pm Tue 16 Mar 10
Living in the real world
says...
2:20pm Tue 16 Mar 10
Tye
says...
4:40pm Tue 16 Mar 10
g1mp
says...
5:11pm Tue 16 Mar 10
davyboy
says...
5:20pm Tue 16 Mar 10
Gentleman Jim
says...
5:50pm Tue 16 Mar 10
bibble
says...
6:09pm Tue 16 Mar 10
Granny wrote:Yes you are missing something, which is not very surprising. The police were found to be "institutionally racist" not so long ago. This latest report simply means nothing has changed.
If more people considered to be acting suspiciously turn out to be coloured, it stands to reason that the proportion will be higher. Or am I missing something here?
bibble
says...
6:13pm Tue 16 Mar 10
Tye wrote:Any story which shows the plod in anything less than super-hero terms is deemed anti-police by some people.
The daily argus anti-police story today they are racist eh? wonder who ben would call if he heaven forbid a member of his family was in danger /under threat - national union of students? wibble?
bibble
says...
6:17pm Tue 16 Mar 10
davyboy wrote:Suffice to say, if you are not acting illegally you are likely to be unlawfully stopped and searched too.
people of all races and colours are stopped every day. suffice to say, if you are acting suspiciously, you are likely to be stopped. it really is that simple. from these figures, i could deduce that coloured people act more suspiciously than whites, but i am not being racist. that is how the figures COULD be interpreted. however, others may say that the police are deliberately targeting coloured people. figures and statistics are open to many different conclusions, dependant on each persons desire or point of view.
bibble
says...
6:19pm Tue 16 Mar 10
Gentleman Jim wrote:Who says that these people were "acting suspiciously"? Don't ever take the word of the police at face value. They lie to suit themselves.
i am pleased that more people who are acting suspiciously are being stopped and searched, it makes me feel safer,whether black or white it will result in less crime. No doubt there would be a reduction if more prisioners served their full sentence.
yorkie44
says...
6:25pm Tue 16 Mar 10
cheezburger
says...
6:55pm Tue 16 Mar 10
ambassador
says...
7:15pm Tue 16 Mar 10
Darling2
says...
12:54am Wed 17 Mar 10
BringBackGoodGrammar
says...
3:23am Wed 17 Mar 10
Granny wrote:Coloured? be careful that the little green men dont come and take you away in the night.
If more people considered to be acting suspiciously turn out to be coloured, it stands to reason that the proportion will be higher. Or am I missing something here?
davyboy
says...
7:58am Wed 17 Mar 10
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for Jobs in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley and more...
Search Now »
Find the right person in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley...
Search Now »
Search for Homes in Brighton, Worthing, Hove, Lewes...
Search Now »
Search for Cars in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley...
Search Now »
cheezburger says...
1:01pm Tue 16 Mar 10