News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Pictures of Sarah Payne found in her killer's cell


The man convicted of murdering schoolgirl Sarah Payne was found with pictures of her in his cell.

Roy Whiting, 51, had newspaper and magazine cuttings about the eight-year-old and other young girls in his cell at Wakefield Prison in West Yorkshire.

The disturbing discovery was made during a routine search and detailed in a prison report seen by a national newspaper.

The newspaper quoted the 2009 report as saying: "It is of serious concern that the security information indicates hidden newspaper cuttings of Mr Whiting's victim and young girls were discovered during a cell search.

"It appears that his interest in young girls continues to be evident within the prison environment."

The report said that Whiting refused to accept responsibility for Sarah's murder. He killed her in 2000.

She vanished while playing with her brothers and sister in a field near her grandparents' house in Littlehampton.

Search teams looked for 16 days before her body was found 12 miles away.

After Whiting was convicted, it emerged that he had kidnapped and sexually assaulted a nine-year-old girl five years earlier.

Since the murder, her mother, Sara Payne, has campaigned tirelessly for victims' rights and for a change in the law to publicise where sex offenders live.

A Prison Service spokeswoman said: "We don't comment on individual cases.

"Where inappropriate materials are found in prisoners' cells they are immediately removed and the prisoner may be subject to disciplinary proceedings.

"Behaviour in prison is one of the factors considered by the Parole Board in their decision-making."

Comments(24)

ade1200 says...
11:11am Sun 21 Mar 10

Crimes of this nature should not be treated in the same way as other crimes. Sexual criminals have dangerous mental illnesses. AFTER serving their sentence they should either be confined for life in a mental institution or castrated.

scthetruth says...
11:21am Sun 21 Mar 10

Unbelievable!

Lil says...
11:58am Sun 21 Mar 10

I've always considered myself to be pretty level headed about the whole "think of the children" thing but seriously, this guy should never ever be released for jail. He clearly still poses a threat and has no place in our society. He made that choice 10 years ago and now he should die with it behind bars.

MaryHinge says...
12:02pm Sun 21 Mar 10

My understanding is that he will spend the rest of his life in jail. I can't see what all this fuss is about. He's a paedophile, he's bound to have pictures of young girls.

scthetruth says...
1:27pm Sun 21 Mar 10

MaryHinge wrote:
My understanding is that he will spend the rest of his life in jail. I can't see what all this fuss is about. He's a paedophile, he's bound to have pictures of young girls.
What, in Jail? Do you honestly think this is acceptable?

corruptive says...
2:11pm Sun 21 Mar 10

Since every tabloid newpaper in the land is full of 'saucy' pics of teen girls, it would be difficult to avoid him having such pics unless he's not allowed newspapers - and since bent prison staff will happily supply inmates with whatever they want, from copies of the Sunday Sport to crack cocaine, what do we expect....?

Mr Lahey says...
3:49pm Sun 21 Mar 10

this man has a plethora of problems. Put him down.

MaryHinge says...
5:55pm Sun 21 Mar 10

scthetruth wrote:
MaryHinge wrote: My understanding is that he will spend the rest of his life in jail. I can't see what all this fuss is about. He's a paedophile, he's bound to have pictures of young girls.
What, in Jail? Do you honestly think this is acceptable?
Given his offending history, it's safer for him to have them in prison than outside it. I don't see what harm it's causing if he's locked up for life, as I understand he is.

UglyAmerican says...
6:10pm Sun 21 Mar 10

MaryHinge wrote:
scthetruth wrote:
MaryHinge wrote: My understanding is that he will spend the rest of his life in jail. I can't see what all this fuss is about. He's a paedophile, he's bound to have pictures of young girls.
What, in Jail? Do you honestly think this is acceptable?
Given his offending history, it's safer for him to have them in prison than outside it. I don't see what harm it's causing if he's locked up for life, as I understand he is.
What harm? How about the distress it causes the families when information such as this comes public?

Why should this animal be allowed to continue taking any pleasure at all in relation to this?

It would be nice to read the story of a fellow inmate trying to flush this excreta down the toilet.....

Honey68 says...
6:19pm Sun 21 Mar 10

MaryHinge wrote:
scthetruth wrote:
MaryHinge wrote: My understanding is that he will spend the rest of his life in jail. I can't see what all this fuss is about. He's a paedophile, he's bound to have pictures of young girls.
What, in Jail? Do you honestly think this is acceptable?
Given his offending history, it's safer for him to have them in prison than outside it. I don't see what harm it's causing if he's locked up for life, as I understand he is.
So, would you be happy for him to have pictures of your little girl? I for one would not be, when I dread to imagine the thoughts that are going through his depraved mind when he is looking at them pictures!!

MaryHinge says...
7:43pm Sun 21 Mar 10

UglyAmerican wrote:
MaryHinge wrote:
scthetruth wrote:
MaryHinge wrote: My understanding is that he will spend the rest of his life in jail. I can't see what all this fuss is about. He's a paedophile, he's bound to have pictures of young girls.
What, in Jail? Do you honestly think this is acceptable?
Given his offending history, it's safer for him to have them in prison than outside it. I don't see what harm it's causing if he's locked up for life, as I understand he is.
What harm? How about the distress it causes the families when information such as this comes public? Why should this animal be allowed to continue taking any pleasure at all in relation to this? It would be nice to read the story of a fellow inmate trying to flush this excreta down the toilet.....
If families are indeed distressed when information such as this becomes public then don't make it public. It's nobodies business except for prison authorities, probation and police.

cheezburger says...
7:44pm Sun 21 Mar 10

Whilst Roy Whiting is responsible for his own actions i also think that the tabloids are guilty of whipping up hysteria for this story. No doubt the cuttngs were from a tabloid, possibly the same tabloid that 'acquired' this report. I have no idea what conditions are like in jail, if they ae llowed papers etc, but he is locked away and can do no harm anymore. The only thing this story achieves in selling more papers.

MaryHinge says...
7:48pm Sun 21 Mar 10

cheezburger wrote:
Whilst Roy Whiting is responsible for his own actions i also think that the tabloids are guilty of whipping up hysteria for this story. No doubt the cuttngs were from a tabloid, possibly the same tabloid that 'acquired' this report. I have no idea what conditions are like in jail, if they ae llowed papers etc, but he is locked away and can do no harm anymore. The only thing this story achieves in selling more papers.
Well said Cheezburger. A sane response in a sea of moralising hysterical outpourings from the usual suspects.

BTW newspapers are available in Prison

UglyAmerican says...
9:04pm Sun 21 Mar 10

MaryHinge wrote:
UglyAmerican wrote:
MaryHinge wrote:
scthetruth wrote:
MaryHinge wrote: My understanding is that he will spend the rest of his life in jail. I can't see what all this fuss is about. He's a paedophile, he's bound to have pictures of young girls.
What, in Jail? Do you honestly think this is acceptable?
Given his offending history, it's safer for him to have them in prison than outside it. I don't see what harm it's causing if he's locked up for life, as I understand he is.
What harm? How about the distress it causes the families when information such as this comes public? Why should this animal be allowed to continue taking any pleasure at all in relation to this? It would be nice to read the story of a fellow inmate trying to flush this excreta down the toilet.....
If families are indeed distressed when information such as this becomes public then don't make it public. It's nobodies business except for prison authorities, probation and police.
Rubbish. Prisoners are wards of the state. Any action of the state in a free country should be public knowledge, save perhaps that which could threaten the security of the state.

Wiggsy says...
11:10pm Sun 21 Mar 10

MaryHinge wrote:
UglyAmerican wrote:
MaryHinge wrote:
scthetruth wrote:
MaryHinge wrote: My understanding is that he will spend the rest of his life in jail. I can't see what all this fuss is about. He's a paedophile, he's bound to have pictures of young girls.
What, in Jail? Do you honestly think this is acceptable?
Given his offending history, it's safer for him to have them in prison than outside it. I don't see what harm it's causing if he's locked up for life, as I understand he is.
What harm? How about the distress it causes the families when information such as this comes public? Why should this animal be allowed to continue taking any pleasure at all in relation to this? It would be nice to read the story of a fellow inmate trying to flush this excreta down the toilet.....
If families are indeed distressed when information such as this becomes public then don't make it public. It's nobodies business except for prison authorities, probation and police.
So just to clarify then, had this happened to your daughter, you'd have been happy for her killer to have this material in his cell?

tonybee says...
4:37am Mon 22 Mar 10

What a shame his mother didn't keep an anadin between her knees.
Nature kills sick misfits - so should we

tonybee says...
4:37am Mon 22 Mar 10

What a shame his mother didn't keep an anadin between her knees.
Nature kills sick misfits - so should we

tonybee says...
4:37am Mon 22 Mar 10

What a shame his mother didn't keep an anadin between her knees.
Nature kills sick misfits - so should we

Dicky71 says...
6:58am Mon 22 Mar 10

Roy Whiting should be hung.

Nyberg says...
8:36am Mon 22 Mar 10

Dicky71 wrote:
Roy Whiting should be hung.
If you are going to suggest that, at least have the intelligence to get it right - in this context the word is 'hanged'.
Typical of all the other 'cut his balls off / string him up' comments.
The fact is, Roy Whiting will never be allowed out, and him being found keeping these photos will just ensure that is the case.
Cheezeburger's comment is right on the money.

puddingandpi says...
8:36pm Mon 22 Mar 10

Ok, now I know I always see the best in people, but do you think he might have had the pictures to remind him of what he had done - but not in a pervy getting off on it way, in a feel guilty & never forget what you did sort of way?
No? I would hope that would be the case, but it isn't, is it? He shouldn't be allowed tabloids, make him stick to the Times or The Guardian. At least they're not so hysterical.
And he definitely shouldn't be released. If he still doesn't accept what he's done & that what he's done is wrong, he's still dangerous.
One thing I will add, I understand the "cut his balls off" brigade, but as a victim of paedophilia, I have thought about this a lot. (I don't like "paedophilia" as that means someone who loves children. I prefer "paedosexuality" as these people don't love children at all). Leave his tackle alone - take off his *hands*. It's the hands that do the damage & what could be funnier than a **** perv without the means to do anything about it?

Hovista says...
9:27pm Mon 22 Mar 10

I'm sure lots of prisoners have much worse images in their cells than photographs from the Sun. The irony of this is that it is tabloid hysteria about someone who no doubt has cut out those pictures from their own pages - the same pages that show topless 16 year olds for the gratification of middle aged a***holes. Roy Whiting is a c**t. End of. What did you expect, that he'd go into prison, repent and read only the Bible?

scthetruth says...
11:35am Tue 23 Mar 10

A lot of comments on here from individuals who are neither a parent or have much responsibility at all.

The fact is that just because he is locked up he shouldn't be all allowed access to pictures of children. With the current prison environment that might be difficult to do. Random searches of his cell would do the trick.

Convicted child murderers like him should be simply hung by the neck or injected-makes no difference as long as he is executed.

booplady says...
6:42pm Wed 24 Mar 10

It is disgusting!!!!!!


Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses