David Rogers noticed we published a story about Lewes Lib Dem Norman Baker winning a Channel 4 award for Opposition MP of the Year.

But, he said, we left his name out of the television listing for the awards programme in Saturday's Weekend.

He says: "Your tv section should have mentioned this if you have any claim to reflect this area or, for that matter, to be 'joined up' in thinking across different parts of the paper."

He is right, of course, but surely a little harsh on us for what was a small oversight? But then perhaps I should point out that this is Councillor David Rogers, who represents Newhaven for the Lib Dems on East Sussex County Council. Presumably, he believes every positive mention of his party in the paper is a vote-winner. As if.

Patricia Cooper, on the other hand, is full of praise for our art reviewer Hattie Gordon who, she says, has a "refreshing" knowledge of her subject and expresses herself in a "clear, erudite, well-informed and interesting" way.

Patricia, director of the Star Gallery in Lewes, adds: "I feel her contributions are an excellent addition to The Argus' strong reputation and I look forward to her work in the future." Phew, thanks!

I'm indebted to the reader who rang to complain we had moved The Crestway in Hollingdean, Brighton, to Moulsecoomb in a story last Friday about a house raid.

He felt this undermined the estate's valiant efforts to improve its reputation. Quite right, too, and galling for us since we had already run several stories in the week about a death in The Crestway in which we correctly placed it in Hollingdean.

David Eke, of Brighton, says he reads the paper every day and enjoys the content, especially the sport. However, he is "increasingly irritated" by our "poor standard of spelling and grammar and use of inappropriate and non-existent words".

The latest example was the use of upmost when the correct words was utmost, meaning somebody doing his or her very best to achieve something, while soccer writer Andy Naylor wrote the word intact as two words.

"It certainly detracts from the enjoyment of your newspaper," adds Mr Eke.

He is correct but I should explain that in the rush to get the paper out we sometimes do make errors and this is column is surely evidence of that.

For the record, Mr Eke, the word utmost means most extreme (adj) and there IS a word upmost, an abbreviation of uppermost, meaning of highest in importance/rank etc (adj).

There are two places called Broad Oak or Broadoak, says R W Carden, of Brighton. The first, with two separate words, is on the A28 near Brede and the other is near Burwash.

It was the latter that featured in Saturday's Weekend walk but was wrongly spelt, like the former, with two words.

Many thanks to Mr Carden, who also informs me he was a linotype operator.

Finally, Nigel Baker, of Portslade, asks why we publish letters from "name and address supplied" when there appears from the contents to be no reason why the writers' lives or livelihoods would be threatened.

"I often write and, because I stand by what I say, I insist my name and address are published," he says. "Could it be The Argus just makes them up to fill space or propagate its own opinions?"

No is the answer. We receive many more letters than we can print - hence a one letter per person, per week rule - and have the Voice of the Argus to give our opinion on issues.

As to the anonymous writers, although it's not a practice we encourage, if they have something worthwhile and interesting to say then why not?