I've read some tosh in my time but he or she who must remain nameless (Opinion, March 22) having a pop at D Martin must take the biscuit.
Because of reasons associated with the workplace, the writer is prevented from expressing any views publicly?
Then who's views were being expressed and why was the letter sneakily written at all?
I agree with E South. Correspondence from snipers withholding identity for no good reason is cheap and should not command any space in the paper.
-G Derkson, Brighton
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article