- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@brightonargus
All the latest news and view from the Argus
@theargusoffers
The latest offers and competitions from the Argus
@theargusguide
The best events in Brighton, Hove and Sussex
@ArgusMagazine
Features, interviews, TV, travel and lifestyle from the Argus
- Find us on Facebook
The Argus
The Argus - news, sport and leisure for Brighton, Hove and Sussex
The Argus Offers and Competitions
Keep up to date with all the offers, events and competitions from the Argus
UFO filmed over Brighton (From The Argus)
Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
UFO filmed over Brighton
12:40pm Tuesday 5th April 2011 in News
You can expect to see a few strange sights when out late at night in Brighton but maybe not too much evidence of intelligence life forms.
But one keen-eyed resident believes he has captured video footage of a suspected close encounter of the third kind.
A video appearing on website YouTube this week shows three red lights in a triangular formation hovering over the city.
Malcolm Robinson, of Hastings-based Strange Phenomena Investigations and assistant editor of the world's biggest UFO Magazine UFO MATRIX, said: “Visually it looks quite impressive as it would seem to indicate either three separate red lights, or three red lights attached to an object giving it a triangular appearance. “This shape is quite common as far as UFO reports go. “In the main, the vast majority of UFO reports, as high as 95%, can be identified as having natural explanations, it's the small 5% that puzzle the likes of me and my colleagues worldwide.”
Comments(29)
Interociter
says...
1:05pm Tue 5 Apr 11
I'm on www.theargus.co.uk - where's the video?
JimP
says...
1:19pm Tue 5 Apr 11
lordenglandofsussex
says...
1:22pm Tue 5 Apr 11
JimP wrote:Sod off. We already have enough immigrants, we don't want any more.
So, you earthlings have observed our red lights too. Soon they will go red + amber, and then green, and we will depart for another galaxy. Fear us not, we come in peace and mean you no harm.
useful idiot
says...
1:25pm Tue 5 Apr 11
www.theargus.co.uk..
.
or have you all been gang probed by aliens and somehow lost your marbles?
JimP
says...
1:36pm Tue 5 Apr 11
useful idiot wrote:Alas, we must leave you earth people now. We have taken the link from the Argus website (and many generous payments from your Benefits Agency, for which we thank you).
Show us the link then, we're already at
www.theargus.co.uk..
.
or have you all been gang probed by aliens and somehow lost your marbles?
dhamallamafarmer
says...
1:57pm Tue 5 Apr 11
In other news, the Corn Laws have finally been repealed and women are given the vote.
monty sidewinder
says...
1:58pm Tue 5 Apr 11
monty sidewinder
says...
2:05pm Tue 5 Apr 11
.
http://www.youtube.c
om/watch?v=9S5FIAt9A
ns
GaryS9
says...
2:16pm Tue 5 Apr 11
WakeUpYouFreaks!
says...
2:52pm Tue 5 Apr 11
heartthrob
says...
3:04pm Tue 5 Apr 11
http://www.youtube.c
om/watch?v=mDXtwMG_Z
Nc
Flippin Burghers
says...
3:04pm Tue 5 Apr 11
Morpheus
says...
3:39pm Tue 5 Apr 11
Lorem Ipsum
says...
4:01pm Tue 5 Apr 11
Brunello wrote:A close encounter of the third kind means contact with an extra terrestrial, which this was clearly not. Quite cool though all the same.
"but maybe not too much evidence of intelligence life forms"
Clearly not from the Argus reporters either.
School Holidays again?
taman
says...
5:42pm Tue 5 Apr 11
Brunello
says...
6:14pm Tue 5 Apr 11
Lorem Ipsum wrote:guess you fall into the 'intelligence lifeforms' (see what I did there?) category too. Muppet.
Brunello wrote:A close encounter of the third kind means contact with an extra terrestrial, which this was clearly not. Quite cool though all the same.
"but maybe not too much evidence of intelligence life forms"
Clearly not from the Argus reporters either.
School Holidays again?
Anyway, how come we can't comment on the idiot burglar that fouled up and injured himself?
On that note, the police, pay attention Argus Journo Rats, CAN 'formally arrest him. They just can't 'formally interview' him.
downfader
says...
7:24pm Tue 5 Apr 11
taman wrote:They're the right colour to be lanterns imo.
chineese lanterns
.
What always astounds me about UFO vids on youtube (and before) is how little evidence is actually presented. We've got 24 hour rolling news all over the country, home video cameras are more powerful and high quality then ever.
.
I used to read the Fortean Times. One of the best paranormal and unexplained journals there ever was. From reading that and many of the recommended publications it used to list I became convinced that we're probably not being visited by alien life. There would just be some kind of proof by now.
.
One of the biggest indicators of this is the SETI investigation. The "where is everybody" quote is one of the most famous quotes in the field of ET investigation, we've flung out radio signals into space for over 100 years and not heard a single one back from another civilisation. Those signals have spread out to half way through out Galaxy.. yet nothing back.
.
Either they have more advanced forms of communicatiuon and are being coy, or we're not being visited.
The Gnome
says...
7:36pm Tue 5 Apr 11
crunchyf123
says...
12:19am Wed 6 Apr 11
i am the person who filmed this footage
i posted it as a test to see for myself how many would bite .... i had always intended to expose this for what it was to show people that they are way to eager to jump to fantastical conclusions, without researching and examining the video and many others .... i see the argus was proberbly the reason this got exposed to early ... i wanted to leave this up until next week .. but it lasted 5 days ... better than nothing i suppose.
i have contacted the argus especially as they know **** well what this is
and the article presents this in a misleading way.
an unexpected result from my experiment lol
crunchyf123
says...
12:25am Wed 6 Apr 11
its here for people wanting to view my original posting http://www.disclose.
tv/action/viewvideo/
70179/Triangle_UFO__
_Hovers_Over_Brighto
n_UK__/
WakeUpYouFreaks!
says...
3:19pm Wed 6 Apr 11
crunchyf123 wrote:Wow. Thanks Crunchyf123. We are honoured to have such an intelligent lifeform walking amongst us and experimenting on our tiny human minds. Go on, admit it... you 'proberbly' thought that it was a ufo when you filmed it didn't you? I can't think why else you'd bother to be honest.
some great comments thats for the laugh :D i am the person who filmed this footage i posted it as a test to see for myself how many would bite .... i had always intended to expose this for what it was to show people that they are way to eager to jump to fantastical conclusions, without researching and examining the video and many others .... i see the argus was proberbly the reason this got exposed to early ... i wanted to leave this up until next week .. but it lasted 5 days ... better than nothing i suppose. i have contacted the argus especially as they know **** well what this is and the article presents this in a misleading way. an unexpected result from my experiment lol
crunchyf123
says...
4:52pm Wed 6 Apr 11
my aim was really an attept at wakeing
up some of the ufo fundamentalists
out there .... if i get just one of them to start to think in a logical way then i have succeeded.
in the beginning i was a "believer" but soon saw through the bs
and i am now a skeptic.
see ufowatchdog.com
99.99999999 % of sighting are misidentifications and hoaxes or natural phenomina but the small amount of wierd sightings are much more likely to be military related imo .... be it uav's or secret projects.
for example the huge triangle "ufo's" are military air ships used for transport and observation .... i do, however allow the possibility we may have been "visited" at some point in the past as nobody can say thats impossible. especially as mainstream science now accepts there is almost certainly life "out there" in the mind boggingly gigantic universe.
and i knew **** well what i was filming ... i had waited for months for the right conditions so the cranes were barely visible.
crunchyf123
says...
5:06pm Wed 6 Apr 11
this quote from the article is complete lies and speculation ...... 1. i have not been contacted by the argus and there were plenty of references in the youtube video comments for them to contact me via youtube.
2 this video would be a close encounter of the 1st kind.
the 3rd kind is alien contact the 2nd kind is a landing and the 1st kind is a sighting in the sky.
i stopped watching tv and reading papers many years ago because they are just filled with propaganda and bs
designed to keep the public dumb and stupid ..... and you only have to look at our society to see thats the case.
downfader
says...
5:42pm Wed 6 Apr 11
crunchyf123 wrote:It is a strange kind of person who moans about propaganda and then fakes a UFO video, and not a very good one at that by the comments on here.
"But one keen-eyed resident believes he has captured video footage of a suspected close encounter of the third kind." this quote from the article is complete lies and speculation ...... 1. i have not been contacted by the argus and there were plenty of references in the youtube video comments for them to contact me via youtube. 2 this video would be a close encounter of the 1st kind. the 3rd kind is alien contact the 2nd kind is a landing and the 1st kind is a sighting in the sky. i stopped watching tv and reading papers many years ago because they are just filled with propaganda and bs designed to keep the public dumb and stupid ..... and you only have to look at our society to see thats the case.
crunchyf123
says...
1:00am Thu 7 Apr 11
downfader wrote:actually it was believed by most people that commented on the embedded video until someone from brighton saw it and it appeared in this "cough" story..... its still appearing on other sites too .... how many 1080i videos of ufos are out there .... i can tell you not many .... most are low res and grainy .... this is why this video got so much attention
crunchyf123 wrote:It is a strange kind of person who moans about propaganda and then fakes a UFO video, and not a very good one at that by the comments on here.
"But one keen-eyed resident believes he has captured video footage of a suspected close encounter of the third kind." this quote from the article is complete lies and speculation ...... 1. i have not been contacted by the argus and there were plenty of references in the youtube video comments for them to contact me via youtube. 2 this video would be a close encounter of the 1st kind. the 3rd kind is alien contact the 2nd kind is a landing and the 1st kind is a sighting in the sky. i stopped watching tv and reading papers many years ago because they are just filled with propaganda and bs designed to keep the public dumb and stupid ..... and you only have to look at our society to see thats the case.
unfortunatly the embedded video has been deleted now so you cant see the 6 pages of comments.
or the 7600+ views or 15 positive ratings or all the tweets and facebook likes that video got in 5 days
the so called expert that was interviewed was impressed too so your comment is baseless.
and besides the comments on here are mainly about how this so called "news paper" even bothered to report an obvious hoax (when looked at with a brightonian perspective) and implied it was a real ufo ... thats what you should be considering .... hence my propaganda statement.
i will accept that it is a bit hypocritical to state what i did after posting this hoax but i always intended to expose
it to show people they should not believe everything they see, my intentions were honerable and if i used deceptive methods to try to wake people up from their delusions i think the ends justify the means.
WakeUpYouFreaks!
says...
12:59pm Thu 7 Apr 11
crunchyf123 wrote:So, you are telling me that this video was completely pre-meditated and that you waited for the correct conditions to make it for months?! Yeah, right.
downfader wrote:actually it was believed by most people that commented on the embedded video until someone from brighton saw it and it appeared in this "cough" story..... its still appearing on other sites too .... how many 1080i videos of ufos are out there .... i can tell you not many .... most are low res and grainy .... this is why this video got so much attention unfortunatly the embedded video has been deleted now so you cant see the 6 pages of comments. or the 7600+ views or 15 positive ratings or all the tweets and facebook likes that video got in 5 days the so called expert that was interviewed was impressed too so your comment is baseless. and besides the comments on here are mainly about how this so called "news paper" even bothered to report an obvious hoax (when looked at with a brightonian perspective) and implied it was a real ufo ... thats what you should be considering .... hence my propaganda statement. i will accept that it is a bit hypocritical to state what i did after posting this hoax but i always intended to expose it to show people they should not believe everything they see, my intentions were honerable and if i used deceptive methods to try to wake people up from their delusions i think the ends justify the means.crunchyf123 wrote: "But one keen-eyed resident believes he has captured video footage of a suspected close encounter of the third kind." this quote from the article is complete lies and speculation ...... 1. i have not been contacted by the argus and there were plenty of references in the youtube video comments for them to contact me via youtube. 2 this video would be a close encounter of the 1st kind. the 3rd kind is alien contact the 2nd kind is a landing and the 1st kind is a sighting in the sky. i stopped watching tv and reading papers many years ago because they are just filled with propaganda and bs designed to keep the public dumb and stupid ..... and you only have to look at our society to see thats the case.It is a strange kind of person who moans about propaganda and then fakes a UFO video, and not a very good one at that by the comments on here.
There seems to be a current trend of weirdos posting links to really hokey websites. I had a look at ufowatchdog.com, and from what i can gather, the devout non-believers in the world of paranormal/extra-ter
restrial activity are just as weird as the devout believers. Your exercise in exposing the 'alien fraud' is also indicative of this. What's your next expose Crunchy? A sock puppet in Loch Ness??
downfader
says...
7:38pm Thu 7 Apr 11
WakeUpYouFreaks! wrote:Oh god! I've just spat cola all over me screen! Hehe! How about a tabby in Hayling Island
crunchyf123 wrote:So, you are telling me that this video was completely pre-meditated and that you waited for the correct conditions to make it for months?! Yeah, right. There seems to be a current trend of weirdos posting links to really hokey websites. I had a look at ufowatchdog.com, and from what i can gather, the devout non-believers in the world of paranormal/extra-ter restrial activity are just as weird as the devout believers. Your exercise in exposing the 'alien fraud' is also indicative of this. What's your next expose Crunchy? A sock puppet in Loch Ness??downfader wrote:actually it was believed by most people that commented on the embedded video until someone from brighton saw it and it appeared in this "cough" story..... its still appearing on other sites too .... how many 1080i videos of ufos are out there .... i can tell you not many .... most are low res and grainy .... this is why this video got so much attention unfortunatly the embedded video has been deleted now so you cant see the 6 pages of comments. or the 7600+ views or 15 positive ratings or all the tweets and facebook likes that video got in 5 days the so called expert that was interviewed was impressed too so your comment is baseless. and besides the comments on here are mainly about how this so called "news paper" even bothered to report an obvious hoax (when looked at with a brightonian perspective) and implied it was a real ufo ... thats what you should be considering .... hence my propaganda statement. i will accept that it is a bit hypocritical to state what i did after posting this hoax but i always intended to expose it to show people they should not believe everything they see, my intentions were honerable and if i used deceptive methods to try to wake people up from their delusions i think the ends justify the means.crunchyf123 wrote: "But one keen-eyed resident believes he has captured video footage of a suspected close encounter of the third kind." this quote from the article is complete lies and speculation ...... 1. i have not been contacted by the argus and there were plenty of references in the youtube video comments for them to contact me via youtube. 2 this video would be a close encounter of the 1st kind. the 3rd kind is alien contact the 2nd kind is a landing and the 1st kind is a sighting in the sky. i stopped watching tv and reading papers many years ago because they are just filled with propaganda and bs designed to keep the public dumb and stupid ..... and you only have to look at our society to see thats the case.It is a strange kind of person who moans about propaganda and then fakes a UFO video, and not a very good one at that by the comments on here.
:-D
Ashles
says...
2:05pm Mon 11 Apr 11
designed to keep the public dumb and stupid ..... "
And thank heavens you did. The strategy clearly paid dividends.
Brunello says...
12:53pm Tue 5 Apr 11
Clearly not from the Argus reporters either.
School Holidays again?