News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Worthing Vodafone user wins charges battle

A mobile phone user who was sent an astronomical bill has won a battle with telecoms giant Vodafone to get his money back.

Freelance journalist and website publisher Neil Winton was hit with hundreds of pounds in data roaming charges by Vodafone after a trip to America.

But after threatening to take the matter to the Small Claims Court, the 66-year-old got his money refunded.

Mr Winton said he was shocked to receive bills of £550.55 for January and £238.39 for the following month after the two-week US trip in January - his monthly bill is usually roughly £70.

He calculated he had been overcharged by £627.45 by Vodafone for data roaming charges he was unaware he was incurring through his HTC Legend phone.

"I was told about all the great things the phone would do, but I wasn't told it would incur all these extra charges. I wasn't aware I could turn it off," he said.

"As soon as you step across an international line apparently the charges suddenly rocket up.

"It struck me as particularly weird when going to America, where the phone systems are cheaper than they are in the UK, Vodafone are charging these charges to use the American system.

"If you were travelling to Angola or Honduras you might think it makes sense, but not in a cheaper market like the US.

"To be fair to Vodafone they did send out a message of some kind but it meant absolutely nothing to me.

"It talks in megabytes, if it had said I had consumed £50 worth of data I would have known what they were talking about but they used some sort of language that wouldn't mean anything to most people."

Mr Winton, from Findon, wrote to Vodafone contesting the charges, instructing the company that it owed him the £627.45 that he felt were extra and unwanted charges for data roaming.

After his first complaint, the company offered to cut the data content of the £550.55 bill by 25% and of the current bill also by 25%.

Mr Winton declined the offer and took his case to the Sunday Times and BBC Radio 4's You And Yours programme.

Half an hour before the radio programme went on air, he was offered a 50% cut in the bill but again declined, he said.

Mr Winton instead threatened to take the mobile phone giant to the Small Claims Court, giving the company a deadline to respond before he started legal action.

"I set out in a letter exactly what I was complaining about, and saying that unless I received full compensation, I would see them in court.

"About a week before my deadline expired, I received another call from the Vodafone Director's Office, agreeing to refund everything I had claimed."

He has now received a full refund of the £627.45 he claimed he was owed.

Mr Winton added: "All I had done was threatened to take them to court and the letter I wrote to them was a basis for a small claims court case which I actually didn't ever start.

"I'm pleased enough to have got my money back, but it strikes me that there are hundreds of people who have been hit by the kind of charges I was hit with."

A Vodafone spokeswoman said they could not comment on individual cases, but all of their charges were on their website for the UK as well as countries people might be travelling to, so customers could look at where they are going and what they would be charged.

Comments(14)

rick_w says...
4:00pm Mon 23 May 11

Why should he have got off with it? I have an Android-based phone like the Legend. Data Roaming (i.e. using data services when abroad) is turned off by default. When you turn it on, you're warned that you may incur significant costs.

The man is an idiot.

rick_w says...
4:01pm Mon 23 May 11

Incidentally, he claims he's a "Website Publisher", so he should bloody well know what megabytes are!

feline1 says...
4:38pm Mon 23 May 11

Small Claims Court? Obviously he'd never heard of OfComm. Still, he seems to have gotten the result he wanted anyways.

Just Four Cough says...
4:46pm Mon 23 May 11

probably because it is Ofcom

monty sidewinder says...
5:23pm Mon 23 May 11

EVERYBODY knows it's a rip off to use your mobile abroad!! good luck to him, he's blagged them well and not had to pay the bill that 'he didn't know he was running up' !! hmmm.

yaddab says...
5:57pm Mon 23 May 11

A Freelance Jounalist and Website Publisher should no far far better in this day and age.

Fight Back says...
6:14pm Mon 23 May 11

rick_w wrote:
Why should he have got off with it? I have an Android-based phone like the Legend. Data Roaming (i.e. using data services when abroad) is turned off by default. When you turn it on, you're warned that you may incur significant costs.

The man is an idiot.
Data roaming isn't turned off by default on all models of handset.

@feline1 - Ofcom are useless. It really isn't worth reporting anything to them. He did the right thing - offered to discuss it in court. Vodaphone obviously realised they could have lost and so decided to settle out of court. If they thought they were in the right they could easily have gone to court and fought their corner.

John Steed says...
7:52pm Mon 23 May 11

yaddab wrote:
A Freelance Jounalist and Website Publisher should no far far better in this day and age.
"Know" i think you mean, as you point out know is what he didnt! should of used the web to research phone costs & services before he went, obviously never heard of google.
nice of vodafone to pay for his shortcomings, still, cheaper to settle than employ a solicitor

Caulders says...
9:40pm Mon 23 May 11

This man sounds like a simpleton.

Cabin fever says...
10:40pm Mon 23 May 11

Caulders wrote:
This man sounds like a simpleton.
I think you're right Caulders.

For me, the sentence: "To be fair to Vodafone they did send out a message of some kind but it meant absolutely nothing to me," just about sums up this guy's attitude and frankly, it stinks.

He gives freelance journalism a bad name.

Brandie says...
11:53am Tue 24 May 11

John Steed wrote:
yaddab wrote: A Freelance Jounalist and Website Publisher should no far far better in this day and age.
"Know" i think you mean, as you point out know is what he didnt! should of used the web to research phone costs & services before he went, obviously never heard of google. nice of vodafone to pay for his shortcomings, still, cheaper to settle than employ a solicitor
If you're going to correct someone's spelling, you should at least know the difference between "of" and "have." You should have used "have," not "of."

Spx says...
12:50pm Tue 24 May 11

vodacon!

cersei says...
1:34pm Tue 24 May 11

I think the critics missed the point- the Providers have quite purposefully complicated and obscured roaming charges and phone technology to insure confusion. If your mobile automatically switches to an in country provider why would the charges be so high- you are accessing from a local network. Mr Winton and his like do us all favour. Comments on his journalistic skills are irrelevant as is his web publishing which makes me think the critics work for mobile providers.. or perhaps just happy to pay whatever.He won. Vodafone conceded - if they had a case they would have pursued it. Perhaps it is time to examine your own bills! I know I am.

Cabin fever says...
7:39pm Tue 24 May 11

Brandie wrote:
John Steed wrote:
yaddab wrote: A Freelance Jounalist and Website Publisher should no far far better in this day and age.
"Know" i think you mean, as you point out know is what he didnt! should of used the web to research phone costs & services before he went, obviously never heard of google. nice of vodafone to pay for his shortcomings, still, cheaper to settle than employ a solicitor
If you're going to correct someone's spelling, you should at least know the difference between "of" and "have." You should have used "have," not "of."
Agreed. A capital 'N' on 'nice' would have been, er, nice too! Not to mention a full stop at the end.

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree