News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Sussex MPs make £50,000 worth of claims

Tube fares, TV licenses and copies of The Argus were among more than £50,000 of claims Sussex MPs made in expenses in just two months.

Receipts published by the parliamentary independent watchdog show our elected representatives in Westminster claimed back on average more than £3,000 in January and February addition to their basic salaries.

And with rules set to be relaxed, authorities believe the total bill of £3.2 million claimed by the country's MPs in that period will increase in the coming months.

The most recent data for the first two months of this year show hundreds of claims from all 16 Sussex MPs amounted to £51,623.47.

Children's minister Tim Loughton was the highest claimant with £9,872.53.

Among the East Worthing and Shoreham MP's claims were restaurant bills in Parliament, petrol money for his own car and copies of local newspapers.

Eastbourne MP Stephen Lloyd was the second highest claimant with £6,776.52 in January and February.

This included £335 to set up a website and £1,560 on hotels in central London.

Meanwhile Energy Minister and Wealden MP Charles Hendry claimed £6,624.93, which went entirely to the Wealden Conservative Association for fees for his agent.

Among Cabinet Office minister and Horsham MP Francis Maude's claims for £4,464.73 were two direct debit payments for a TV licence while transport minister and Lewes MP Norman Baker claimed for tube fares for an intern from Westminster to Grange Hill.

Brighton Pavilion MP Caroline Lucas claimed nearly £1,000 for hotel stays in central London while Brighton Kemptown MP Simon Kirby spent £120 on hiring out community venues.

Peter Bottomley (Worthing West), Nick Herbert (Arundel and South Downs), Nick Gibb (Bognor and Littlehampton) and Andrew Tyrie (Chichester) did not make any claims.

The Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa), which now deals with MPs' claims in the wake of the expenses scandal, said it costs £2 on average to process each receipt.

But Climate Change Minister Greg Barker charged the taxpayer separate claims for 40p and 88p for journeys of one mile.

It is the second time running the Bexhill and Battle MP has done this.

He has previously told The Argus the claims were part of bigger submissions that have simply been broken down to give a clearer picture of where he had travelled.

The total payments for the start of this year were the same as for the last two months of 2010.

In a series of concessions to soothe MPs furious about the system introduced in the wake of the Westminster pay and perks scandal, Ipsa is now allowing them to spend more.

The controversial changes were announced in March after complaints from MPs that the system created in the wake of the expenses scandal is too restrictive and bureaucratic.

Ipsa has refused to estimate how much the changes would cost the taxpayer, saying it would depend on what MPs decided to claim.

The extra staff spending for 650 MPs could potentially reach £3.25 million, and the accommodation bill is likely to rise by hundreds of thousands of pounds.

Comments(9)

feline1 says...
1:57pm Sat 4 Jun 11

er, what's the story here? They're allowed to claim these expenses as part of their job. They're not bogus or false.

NickBrt says...
2:05pm Sat 4 Jun 11

What an easy job a 'journalist' has. Make FOI requests then publish them word for word! We should be told how much salary and expenses these 'reporters' get as their hands should drop off in shame when they draw their money.

SimonS says...
2:22pm Sat 4 Jun 11

I normally defend the Argus, but it's a mystery to me what this story's about too.

If I went up to London and stayed in a hotel, I would claim expenses for transport and accommodation too.

Figures presented without any context are meaningless.

a person says...
3:47pm Sat 4 Jun 11

Well I am interested in this news story.
In my opinion
TV licenses,
restaurant bills and
copies of local newspapers.
Should not be allowed to be claimed as expenses .

Also maybe there could be a list of cheaper or special offer hotels that the MPs could use
or maybe they could share a room ..

Weather they are allowed to claim these expenses or not, in my opinion
they are still ripping off the tax payer .

monty sidewinder says...
4:22pm Sat 4 Jun 11

i think it's completely outrageous that one of them actually wasted taxpayers money to buy the argus! i demand an inquirey!

game on says...
4:43pm Sat 4 Jun 11

NickBrt wrote:
What an easy job a 'journalist' has. Make FOI requests then publish them word for word! We should be told how much salary and expenses these 'reporters' get as their hands should drop off in shame when they draw their money.
This paper would not recognise a Journalist' if it was pictured on the front page! Non story! haha noticed how they have cut the comments on any story that will be ridiculed even more than this drivel.

Morpheus says...
4:45pm Sat 4 Jun 11

These reports come round and round for the simple reason that MPs are not paid enough. This is how the expenses problem started. We need a means to work out a fixed salary for them, except perhaps for travel to the constituency, which will vary a lot. Let them manage their salary and not claim expenses and we will know exactly what they are being paid and we need not be concerned about how they spend it.

joebie sussex says...
6:29pm Sat 4 Jun 11

cant they live off their wages, I would like to be able to afford things, but when you are disabled and unable to work, see if they could survive on £70-oo a week I still have to pay rent and council tax ( no benefits). I would love to be able to have at least 1 luxury a month.

TheInsider says...
9:13am Sun 5 Jun 11

Morpheus the non-financial benefits MPs receive are considerable and many non declarable or visible.
There are vast amounts of freebies to events, there are doors opened in jobs for children and relatives, there are job offers if they lose their seats and if you actually look at your MPs CV very few of them now have business experience or even qualifications for a job so the salary they receive is better than the low paid job they would get in real life.
Many years ago MPs had given up good jobs in industry but now many are career politicians.

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree