News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Sussex coastline abandoned to the sea

Large parts of the Sussex coastline will disappear into the sea within 15 years, a Government report has revealed.

A study by the Environment Agency into coastal defences across Sussex highlights more than ten miles of the shoreline which will be lost to erosion.

Newhaven, Seaford and beauty spots such as Birling Gap are all listed as being affected by damage caused by the sea because of a lack of protection.

And the report warns as much as 20 metres of land could be lost in some places by 2025.

The study has been drawn up to show communities how erosion could affect where they live.

Newhaven’s coastline from Newhaven Heights to the harbour is predicted to have been eroded by up to 20 metres by 2025.

The report is grim reading for those parts of Sussex which currently have defences, too.

Properties along the coast through Brighton and Hove, Shoreham, Worthing and Littlehampton are assessed as being at “significant” risk of flooding, along with homes and businesses near the banks of the Arun, Adur and Ouse.

Lewes MP Norman Baker yesterday (November 20) vowed to take the Newhaven’s shoreline policy up with the Environment Agency.

He said: “The climate change chickens are coming home to roost.

“We have already seen cottage after cottage in Birling Gap go into the sea.

“There has always been erosion but it has now accelerated."

Judith Ost, the leader of Newhaven Town Council, said: “While I would like the area protected from erosion, currently industrial sites in Newhaven are at very real risk of flooding and this needs to be addressed.”

Environment Minister Richard Benyon said: “Coastal erosion is a natural process and while we can’t defend every single section of cliff or beach."

The Government is spending £2.1 billion tackling erosion and flooding.

See the Environment Agency maps showing coastal erosion areas, here.

See more on this story inside today's Argus.

Daily Echo on Facebook - facebook.com/southerndailyecho Like us on Facebook

Google+ Add us to your circles on Google+

Comments(28)

mtmoocher says...
1:37pm Mon 21 Nov 11

Does this mean a flood of high-rise development at Brighton Marina?

Servalan says...
1:40pm Mon 21 Nov 11

What's the problem? Surely we can all just live in underwater bubble domes? This is the 21st century, after all.

quedula says...
1:48pm Mon 21 Nov 11

The Argus poll question is too simplistic. There are parts of the coast where, because of density of development, it is economically worth investing in sea defences. But money shouldn't be spent on protecting "beauty spots". Coastal erosion just produces a different "beauty spot".

ChrisDS says...
2:11pm Mon 21 Nov 11

coastal erosion is natural, there was a time one could walk to france, then the channel flooded that walkway. worthing is flat that is becauses water used to be there and flattened it by the same token the coastline used to be hundreds of metres further out. Nature will take it's course and as Dr Who once said 'water always wins' Bar building a very long brickwall( or a new A259 ) leave it to nature!

The Real Phil says...
2:17pm Mon 21 Nov 11

"Large parts of the Sussex coastline" = tem miles. Oh dear.

Nick Brighton says...
2:27pm Mon 21 Nov 11

As an example, if 10 cottages were at risk of falling into the sea as a result of erosion, and the total compensation bill would be £10million, is it worth spending say £20million to protect them? It's a relatively simple equation. However, a different equation exists for arable farmland which is under threat, where we have to equate the cost of sea defences, not against the value of the land, but against the ongoing loss of production, and the potential necessity to import crops that we could have grown ourselves.

Johntomgreen says...
2:33pm Mon 21 Nov 11

This is all part of the Environment Agency’s long term strategy to take Sussex “Back to Nature”. Where the Cuckmere is today, the Arun, Adur and Ouse will be tomorrow.
Residents along the Cuckmere have lost the fight to save their floodbanks….will residents along the other three estuaries put up a stronger fight.? Money the EA would once have spent on coastal defences in Sussex when it had an area office in the county now goes towards keeping expensive, luxury homes on the Thames protected from the river.

ShorehamBeachcomber says...
2:37pm Mon 21 Nov 11

Dreadful over sensationalism, there are NO homes along Brighton & hove beaches and Shoreham Beach is expanding not sinking...it's the sand & chalk areas not pebbles where it recedes

Charismatic Andrew says...
2:45pm Mon 21 Nov 11

Nice bit of double standards from that odious weasel Norman Baker - his Government (where he is a transport minister) inflicts inflation busting increases on train users which forces people into their cars thereby increasing car emissions and greenhouse gases. He then has the temerity to lecture us on climate change. What an utter disgrace you are Baker.

Hotbeans says...
3:12pm Mon 21 Nov 11

Could we please let Newhaven and Seaford fall into the sea completely and therefore have a few less eyesores on that stretch of coastline.

ChrisDS says...
5:01pm Mon 21 Nov 11

how soon people forget that bramber and steyning were once major ports ...but then hundreds of years ago there was this global whatevering leaving them with just a little river !

Tailgaters Anonymous says...
5:21pm Mon 21 Nov 11

Is this not the same Environment Agency whose policy of non-management of the Cuckmere Valley that is leading to erosion.
As regards Norman Baker no doubt he will defend himself in his usual fashion - it is those who claim to be Green and seize any and every opportunity to throw dust in opponents' faces who are the real threat!

Morpheus says...
5:50pm Mon 21 Nov 11

Sussex was once connected to France. Isn't it time we reallised that we need to let nature take its course?

Maxwell's Ghost says...
6:24pm Mon 21 Nov 11

Will this mean more flooding of Lewes or just the end of master Baker?

pebble counter says...
6:49pm Mon 21 Nov 11

ChrisDS wrote:
how soon people forget that bramber and steyning were once major ports ...but then hundreds of years ago there was this global whatevering leaving them with just a little river !
How soon people forget? I don't think Steyning and Bramber were ports in living memory were they?

Old Ladys Gin says...
9:54pm Mon 21 Nov 11

We are an island constantly bombarded by tidal waters.
Anyone who has thrown a bucket of water away will see what happens - it washes soil and other things away.
Small wonder that it happens to an island and you can't feasibly shore up (pun intended) 11,000 miles of coastline.

rolivan says...
10:02pm Mon 21 Nov 11

Spare a thought for those POOR soles that own properties on the seafront at Aldrington Basin and Their Private Beach.Norman and Zoe and Heather and the like.

GRANDAD says...
12:31am Tue 22 Nov 11

Question is,
What purpose is there in the Environmental Agency.
Time to shut them down completely.
All they seem to do is go on tv after the flooding has happened to tell us we have been flooded. Brilliant

graham_Seagull says...
7:09am Tue 22 Nov 11

ShorehamBeachcomber wrote:
Dreadful over sensationalism, there are NO homes along Brighton & hove beaches and Shoreham Beach is expanding not sinking...it's the sand & chalk areas not pebbles where it recedes
Hmmmm can you quote a bit of geology to back that up?

rolivan says...
8:03am Tue 22 Nov 11

GRANDAD wrote:
Question is,
What purpose is there in the Environmental Agency.
Time to shut them down completely.
All they seem to do is go on tv after the flooding has happened to tell us we have been flooded. Brilliant
They don't just cover Flooding as it says in the name they cover the Environment I.E. Rubbish and fly tipping

Joshiman says...
8:25am Tue 22 Nov 11

I suppose they will tell us next that building more sea wind turbines will solve the problem as the turbines will push back the tide away from our shores.Oh you Greens make us laugh.

salty_pete says...
8:28am Tue 22 Nov 11

It has long been an established scientific fact, that as Scandinavia is springing back up after the last ice age, so the south of England is sinking and hence sea level rising. It has nothing to do with climate change and Norman Baker is being very disengenuos to suggest it is.

GRUMPAH says...
11:06am Tue 22 Nov 11

Hmm, just wondering about renaming some of our, currently, inland towns:-
Lewes Gap, Hailsham on Sea, Havant Bay. Sounds good to me, but then I won't be around by then to care!

GRUMPAH says...
11:07am Tue 22 Nov 11

OK, I know, Havant is in Hampshire!

ShorehamBeachcomber says...
1:18pm Tue 22 Nov 11

rolivan wrote:
Spare a thought for those POOR soles that own properties on the seafront at Aldrington Basin and Their Private Beach.Norman and Zoe and Heather and the like.
They have significant concrete walls metres above high tide levels so a 2mm rise each year may affect them in say 200 years and then they could simply build an extra floor on top for the next 200 years. So ask Norm again when he's 448 years old

ShorehamBeachcomber says...
1:19pm Tue 22 Nov 11

graham_Seagull wrote:
ShorehamBeachcomber wrote:
Dreadful over sensationalism, there are NO homes along Brighton & hove beaches and Shoreham Beach is expanding not sinking...it's the sand & chalk areas not pebbles where it recedes
Hmmmm can you quote a bit of geology to back that up?
'geolo' how's that?

tengri says...
9:45pm Wed 23 Nov 11

Joshiman wrote:
I suppose they will tell us next that building more sea wind turbines will solve the problem as the turbines will push back the tide away from our shores.Oh you Greens make us laugh.
No they won't.

tengri says...
9:47pm Wed 23 Nov 11

Norman Baker is a fool - it is nothing to do with climate change and it is exactly this kind of alarmist nonsense that has reduced the debate to childish mud slinging.

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree