Report this comment
  • "
    Servalan wrote:
    Number Six wrote:
    Servalan wrote: Why? Because his car was an open-topped convertable. And because dogs tend to make a lot of noise when being flayed alive. And cars tend to handle differently when dragging a carcass. And because a driver has a legal responsibility to check their vehicle is in safe condition before driving it, including mammals tethered to the back. Because witness statements say they tried to stop him. Because he dumped the mutilated corpse in a layby, and failed to stop when a police officer accosted him. Granted, none of these facts incontravertibly *prove* he is lying when he claims it was an accident, but if I were a jury member considering his plea, they are the sort of facts I'd take into consideration when considering its credibility.
    Let's hope you are never on a jury then. Never mind innocent until proven guilty ( a concept you seem to have difficulty with) with you it would be guilty until proven guiltier!
    What brainwrong nonsense. I hope *you* are never on a jury, as you seem incapable of logical thought! It is precisely the jury who decide on the defendant's guilt or innocence! They don't wait for him to be "proven guilty" by a 3rd party. They think for themselves, considering the evidence presented.
    Is your use of irony deliberate or accidental. Are you really trying to say that you would approach the case with an open mind and judge it purely on the evidence presented without the corruption of what you had read in the local tabloid rag.

    Explain what part of my post is illogical. What 3rd party? A jury comes to its verdict based on the evidence presented to it. A defendant is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. What's not to understand.

    Oh, and what page of the dictionary would I find the word "brainwrong""
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

Forensics tests in Sussex Police dog death inquiry

Forensics tests in Sussex Police dog death inquiry – Tweeted by Sussex Police Forensics tests in Sussex Police dog death inquiry – Tweeted by Sussex Police

Police investigating the death of a dog which was dragged behind a car on the A27 have released this image of its lead.

Chris Gee, a Sussex Police scenes of crime officer, released the photo on social networking website Twitter this morning.

He revealed his colleagues are examining a Porsche Carrera which is believed to have dragged the beagle-collie cross along the A27 from Devil's Dyke to Southwick on Sunday night.

Mr Gee said Porsche had agreed to help the inquiry by testing similar vehicles.

A 33-year-old Worthing man has been arrested on suspicion of animal cruelty and released on bail.

The man, who has not been named, released a statement through his solicitor saying the dog's death was a "tragic accident".

When news of the incident broke, more than 1,000 people joined a group on the Facebook website, called Justice for Little Pup.

Read more on this story inside today's Argus.

Daily Echo on Facebook - facebook.com/southerndailyecho Like us on Facebook

Google+ Add us to your circles on Google+

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree