Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
6:20pm Friday 25th November 2011 in News By Emily Walker, Chief Reporter
The police, councils and NHS in Sussex are spending more than £900,000 a year paying union officials’ salaries.
At a time when Sussex Police has announced plans to make budget cuts of £52 million and 550 staff and 500 officers, the force is paying more than £169,000 for the officers’ representatives.
Brighton and Hove City Council spent £282,210 on union salaries, more than both West Sussex and East Sussex county councils, each of which employ more people.
Last year, the city council paid the equivalent of eight full-time employees for the Unison, GMB, NUT, NASUWT and ATL unions.
Industrial relations
Brighton and Hove City Council UNISON representative Alex Knutsen said: “This is the price Brighton and Hove pays for having such good industrial relations.
“We have only had one dispute in the last 14 years since the union was first represented at the authority, and for taxpayers I think that represents good value for money.
“We are able to save a considerable amount for the authority by avoiding disputes and compulsory redundancies.”
Jason Kitcat, the council’s cabinet member for finance, said: “Unions have an important role to play in any modern workforce.
“As a responsible employer, we welcome the role unions play in supporting our staff.
“Given the Government-imposed cuts on council budgets all areas of expenditure are under review.
“We will keep talking with the unions to ensure all areas of spending, including their own, fit with the hard times local government is facing.”
The figures, released under the Freedom of Information Act, show East Sussex County Council spent about £134,571 during 2010/2011 and West Sussex County Council spent £109,105, equivalent to just less than four full time employees.
Brighton and Hove City PCT spent just £2,819, about a tenth of a full-time position.
Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals Trust, which runs Royal Sussex County Hospital in Brighton and Princess Royal Hospital in Haywards Heath, paid for the equivalent of two full time posts for union officials.
Add us to your circles on Google+
Comments(15)
Fercri Sakes
says...
6:41pm Fri 25 Nov 11
fredaj
says...
6:55pm Fri 25 Nov 11
Fercri Sakes wrote:The wages of top earners has nothing to do with the rights and wrongs of the wages of union reps being paid by tax payers.
Wow, you'd think it was the unions bleeding the country dry if you got pent up about this article.
Could somebody let me the know the top 10 earners (and their salaries) at Brighton and Hove City Council and Sussex Police? I bet their packages have risen far above inflation. Surely they would be a better and more prudent target for any investigation?
graham_Seagull
says...
7:23pm Fri 25 Nov 11
fredaj wrote:Don't be so ridiculous.
Fercri Sakes wrote: Wow, you'd think it was the unions bleeding the country dry if you got pent up about this article. Could somebody let me the know the top 10 earners (and their salaries) at Brighton and Hove City Council and Sussex Police? I bet their packages have risen far above inflation. Surely they would be a better and more prudent target for any investigation?The wages of top earners has nothing to do with the rights and wrongs of the wages of union reps being paid by tax payers. I do not care whether it costs £20 or £200,000, union members should pay for their representation themselves.
Maxwell's Ghost
says...
7:32pm Fri 25 Nov 11
Hove Actually
says...
7:55pm Fri 25 Nov 11
graham_Seagull
says...
8:14pm Fri 25 Nov 11
Hove Actually wrote:What? You're so out of date it's unreal!
I would be more supportive of the unions if they did not draw a wage whilst the members were out on the strike they called. Arthur Scargill is a prime example of all that was and still is bad about union reps who don't actually work
fredaj
says...
9:20pm Fri 25 Nov 11
graham_Seagull wrote:Union reps should be paid for by union members.
fredaj wrote:Don't be so ridiculous.
Fercri Sakes wrote: Wow, you'd think it was the unions bleeding the country dry if you got pent up about this article. Could somebody let me the know the top 10 earners (and their salaries) at Brighton and Hove City Council and Sussex Police? I bet their packages have risen far above inflation. Surely they would be a better and more prudent target for any investigation?The wages of top earners has nothing to do with the rights and wrongs of the wages of union reps being paid by tax payers. I do not care whether it costs £20 or £200,000, union members should pay for their representation themselves.
The best union reps I've seen often use their skills to improve relations between staff and bosses, they're invaluable at providing advice and keeping the company employees updated.
The worst companies I've worked in usually don't have formal union reps and often suffer from poor internal comms and liaison.
They can often be the balance and checks on poor performing bosses.
Your views are outdated.
Dave in Hastings
says...
11:53pm Fri 25 Nov 11
Andy R
says...
12:25am Sat 26 Nov 11
graham_Seagull
says...
12:48am Sat 26 Nov 11
fredaj wrote:....and your evidence is...oh no, you don't have any.
graham_Seagull wrote:Union reps should be paid for by union members.fredaj wrote:Don't be so ridiculous. The best union reps I've seen often use their skills to improve relations between staff and bosses, they're invaluable at providing advice and keeping the company employees updated. The worst companies I've worked in usually don't have formal union reps and often suffer from poor internal comms and liaison. They can often be the balance and checks on poor performing bosses. Your views are outdated.Fercri Sakes wrote: Wow, you'd think it was the unions bleeding the country dry if you got pent up about this article. Could somebody let me the know the top 10 earners (and their salaries) at Brighton and Hove City Council and Sussex Police? I bet their packages have risen far above inflation. Surely they would be a better and more prudent target for any investigation?The wages of top earners has nothing to do with the rights and wrongs of the wages of union reps being paid by tax payers. I do not care whether it costs £20 or £200,000, union members should pay for their representation themselves.
leobrighton
says...
6:31am Sat 26 Nov 11
Dave in Hastings wrote:Thats why hardly anyone reads it nowadays
Ah right.... Argus joining in with the worker bashing now eh? What a **** rag this is becoming.... Mouthpiece for the Tories and their paymasters in the City. Where's the connection then Argus... What little crumbs are your parent company and their shareholders getting for printing this rubbish story? At a time when the country has been stuffed by the fat cats, you try and pin it on the unions. What a disgusting bunch weasels you lot are. Why don't you try supporting the ordinary working people of this country, instead of the corrupt scum who are really responsible for the mess we are in. Oh, but that requires a bit more thought, research and intelligence than I suspect exists on your news desk.
What about coming on here and debating it eh?
Morpheus
says...
10:07am Sat 26 Nov 11
AGT999
says...
10:21am Sat 26 Nov 11
nocando
says...
2:14pm Sat 26 Nov 11
Search for Jobs in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley and more...
Search Now »
Find the right person in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley...
Search Now »
Search for Homes in Brighton, Worthing, Hove, Lewes...
Search Now »
Search for Cars in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley...
Search Now »
Servalan says...
6:23pm Fri 25 Nov 11