Outcry at Hove road closure

The A270 Old Shoreham Road in Hove, is closed The A270 Old Shoreham Road in Hove, is closed

The first day back to work and school for tens of thousands of people was marked by the closure of a section of busy road.

Part of Old Shoreham Road, Hove, between The Drive and The Upper Drive, was shut in both directions yesterday (January 3) as part of construction work on a new cycle lane.

Crews started work today (January 4) and transport bosses have warned it will be closed until February 6, with delays expected.

The local authority apologised for any disruption, adding the changes, which include junction improvements, would improve road safety in the area.

But motorists complained of delays to journeys which, for many, were the first trips back to work or school after the festive period.

Chaotic

Conservative councillor Ann Norman said: “There was fairly light traffic today but it was absolutely chaotic. What it’s going to be like in peak hours when everyone is back at work I do not know.

“You have to ask how many people are aware of the work that is going on.”

Gary Robinson, 37, of Franklin Street, Brighton, said: “I’m sure the cycle lane will be a positive addition but does the road really need to be closed for a month?”

A spokeswoman for the local authority said it had closed the road so it could have gangs working on both sides of the road at the same time in order to get the job done quicker.

Brighton and Hove City Council transport cabinet member Ian Davey said: “We apologise for disruption to journeys.

"The Old Shoreham Road cycle route is a major piece of work and when complete will provide user-friendly cycling and pedestrian facilities for all, as well as increasing safety for children attending schools in the area."

Work on the £455,000 scheme to build a 1.5km cycle route, which will stretch from the Dyke Road junction to The Drive, began in November and is due to be complete by May.

The scheme was agreed after the local authority was awarded £330,000 from the sustainable transport charity Sustrans.

Has your journey been affected by the roadworks on the Old Shoreham Road? Share your views below or email news@theargus.co.uk.

More news from The Argus

Daily Echo on Facebook - facebook.com/southerndailyecho Like us on Facebook

Google+ Add us to your circles on Google+

Comments(38)

Hovite says...
5:06pm Wed 4 Jan 12

Give me some buckets of paint and 2 weeks. I will also only work at night, all for £3k.

Hovite says...
5:59pm Wed 4 Jan 12

http://www.weirdcycl
elanes.co.uk/

mustaphaLeeko says...
6:04pm Wed 4 Jan 12

Hovite wrote:
Give me some buckets of paint and 2 weeks. I will also only work at night, all for £3k.
doh.... Hovite, It's not just painted line, they are creating divisions in the road to separate bicycles from cars. If you can do the same work to the same standard, please feel free to do it, else stop moaning.

mustaphaLeeko says...
6:04pm Wed 4 Jan 12

oh, and I'm not a cyclist! lol.

Hovite says...
6:09pm Wed 4 Jan 12

mustaphaLeeko

Not actually moaning, just having a bit of fun.

Have you checked out the weird cycle lane link.

mustaphaLeeko says...
6:15pm Wed 4 Jan 12

Hovite wrote:
mustaphaLeeko Not actually moaning, just having a bit of fun. Have you checked out the weird cycle lane link.
yes... so there are a couple of odd loony looking ones... would you prefer none at all?

Personally I'm happy that cyclists are separted as far as possible from other road users for their own safety and maybe some of the fat slobs will get on a bike too? Car drivers (me included) don't own the road you know!

mustaphaLeeko says...
6:17pm Wed 4 Jan 12

mustaphaLeeko wrote:
Hovite wrote: mustaphaLeeko Not actually moaning, just having a bit of fun. Have you checked out the weird cycle lane link.
yes... so there are a couple of odd loony looking ones... would you prefer none at all? Personally I'm happy that cyclists are separted as far as possible from other road users for their own safety and maybe some of the fat slobs will get on a bike too? Car drivers (me included) don't own the road you know!
aaaggh excuse my speeeelling of , "separated", typo. lol

Hovite says...
6:37pm Wed 4 Jan 12

mustaphaLeeko wrote:
mustaphaLeeko wrote:
Hovite wrote: mustaphaLeeko Not actually moaning, just having a bit of fun. Have you checked out the weird cycle lane link.
yes... so there are a couple of odd loony looking ones... would you prefer none at all? Personally I'm happy that cyclists are separted as far as possible from other road users for their own safety and maybe some of the fat slobs will get on a bike too? Car drivers (me included) don't own the road you know!
aaaggh excuse my speeeelling of , "separated", typo. lol
Spelling mistake axsepted

I never said I would prefer none at all. Just questioning the cost, but also looking forward to seeing what we are getting for our money.

As you have seen in the example web link I would be quite right to question it.

I am a very cyclist conscious driver and painted lines would be sufficient and probably be more practical than some over thought elaborate high cost design.

tez1959 says...
6:47pm Wed 4 Jan 12

thats typicall always putting cycle lanes in and around brighton and hove i hardly see anyone using them the only cyclist i see are the ones that go through red traffic lights they should start charging them cycle tax if theres so many of them then maybe we could all get a reduction in roadtax on our cars and vans anyone agree

rolivan says...
7:20pm Wed 4 Jan 12

Why not use more labour and less machinery and get unemployed back to work at the same time learning skills instead of form filling every week at the jobcentre.

ray ellerton says...
7:30pm Wed 4 Jan 12

the work will extend no more than 1 metre from the kerb line, so why do contractors feel the need to block a whole lane of what is a fairly wide road? If the work area was correctly coned off, then surely traffic from both directions could safely pass, at a reduced speed...

bogs says...
7:30pm Wed 4 Jan 12

Don't moan too much about the cycle lane or a nice cyclist might punch you in the face and kill u!

Brightonscouse2 says...
7:37pm Wed 4 Jan 12

tez1959 wrote:
thats typicall always putting cycle lanes in and around brighton and hove i hardly see anyone using them the only cyclist i see are the ones that go through red traffic lights they should start charging them cycle tax if theres so many of them then maybe we could all get a reduction in roadtax on our cars and vans anyone agree
Where to start. Ok firstly the cycle lane is costing £455,000. £330,000 is being provided by Sustrans a sustainable transport charity. That leaves a total outlay of £125,000 from council coffers. Not a lot when you consider every person that pays council tax contributes towards the up keep of roads. This is why taxing cyclists is impractical. Cycling costs next to no wear and tear to the road. The costs to the environment are nil. The costs to install cycle lanes are met by charitable contributions and those that pay their share of the council tax, towards the maintenance of roads, but only use them to cycle on.

You pay car tax for the use of your car, not the upkeep of roads.

Re: cyclists that jump red lights, yes it's wrong and those that do it should be fined. That money should then be put towards installing cycle lanes and cycling proficiency tests for children.

Maxwell's Ghost says...
7:40pm Wed 4 Jan 12

tez1959, do you want cyclists taken off the road and put back in cars and vans?
So you want more people creating traffic?
The more people on bikes means more space for me on the road in my car.

Hovite says...
7:40pm Wed 4 Jan 12

bogs

It's not about the cycle lane, it's the cost of the scheme.

Should do a trial with just paint or rumble strip first and you may be surprised at how effective and safe this would be?

thommy says...
9:19pm Wed 4 Jan 12

Why do residents sound surprised at the mentally ill greens deranged vision of shangri La. You have got what you voted for. Greens account for about 0.001% of the uk population and only through their trusty band of temporary resident students have managed to secure their very own socialist playground - Brighton and Hove, to try out all their ludicrous marxist experiments such as; "lets increase the population of travellers in the city by at least 40%", or "how about shutting off the roads and shooing away all those nasty cars, then we can ride our cycles everywhere". People outside Brighton cannot believe what is being done by the council under the orders of the cretinious green administration.

longman says...
9:33pm Wed 4 Jan 12

The reason people dont see cyclists on the OSR is because of the aggressive car drivers. They fear for their lives. Sooner the cycle lanes are ready the better!

pistachionut says...
9:42pm Wed 4 Jan 12

spacelab wrote:
i drive up and down old shoreham road , sometimes upto four times a day , and never ever see a cyclist on that road , so what is going on is someone taking the pixx out of the motorist, what a waste of money for nothing.
Absolutely agree. What a complete waste of money.
I support the smaller lanes as this will hopefully stop the vehicles speeding off the lights at The Upper Drive towards Bhasvic which only slow down for the speed camera, however there will be more accidents when people try and jump the queuing traffic to cut down the side roads.
When they changed the traffic islands to The Upper Drive I saw two such accidents and numerous near misses.

Ilyich says...
9:52pm Wed 4 Jan 12

This is a story about roadworks yes? Same thing as closed Lewes Rd, Viaduct Rd, Upper Rock Gdns, St James St in last couple of months? Why fuss Argus? Are roadworks carried out under Green Party different? Or is it roadworks to benefit cyclists that you see as problem?
Seems like Argus has been approaching this story hoping to stir up trouble. Happy for the good sense shown by most of the commenters so far. Less happy with the motivation of reporters seeking to make the news rather than just cover it.

Hovite says...
10:10pm Wed 4 Jan 12

Brighton & Hove has an inherent problem for the average cyclist with the city being too hilly.

London doesn’t have this problem and is why it works well in there. Not forgetting the seafront route on a bad day of weather.

Doesn't matter how much it is promoted, it will never catch on.

Dragon Slayer says...
10:30pm Wed 4 Jan 12

mustaphaLeeko wrote:
Hovite wrote:
mustaphaLeeko Not actually moaning, just having a bit of fun. Have you checked out the weird cycle lane link.
yes... so there are a couple of odd loony looking ones... would you prefer none at all?

Personally I'm happy that cyclists are separted as far as possible from other road users for their own safety and maybe some of the fat slobs will get on a bike too? Car drivers (me included) don't own the road you know!
Err, actually we do! Until Cyclists are made to have compulsory Insurance and prosecuted for cycling on the pavements and disobeying Traffic Signals.... We shall continue to do so!

Ilyich says...
10:34pm Wed 4 Jan 12

Hovite wrote:
Brighton & Hove has an inherent problem for the average cyclist with the city being too hilly.

London doesn’t have this problem and is why it works well in there. Not forgetting the seafront route on a bad day of weather.

Doesn't matter how much it is promoted, it will never catch on.
Oh not really... possible to pedal from Saltdean to Shoreham along the flat (but windy) coast path. Going from Brighton to Lewes is not hill problem but hazardous car and truck problem. Bits Brighton centre too much of a challenge for myself - but Hove (of which you are ite) is pedalling joy! especialy fine cycle lane on Grand Avenue. And the promise of going up is that one will descend! Powered by gravity!

Ilyich says...
10:35pm Wed 4 Jan 12

Hovite wrote:
Brighton & Hove has an inherent problem for the average cyclist with the city being too hilly.

London doesn’t have this problem and is why it works well in there. Not forgetting the seafront route on a bad day of weather.

Doesn't matter how much it is promoted, it will never catch on.
Oh not really... possible to pedal from Saltdean to Shoreham along the flat (but windy) coast path. Going from Brighton to Lewes is not hill problem but hazardous car and truck problem. Bits of Brighton centre too much of a challenge for myself - but Hove (of which you are ite) is pedalling joy! especialy fine cycle lane on Grand Avenue. And the promise of going up is that one will descend! Powered by gravity!

Hovite says...
11:05pm Wed 4 Jan 12

Ilyich wrote:
Hovite wrote:
Brighton & Hove has an inherent problem for the average cyclist with the city being too hilly.

London doesn’t have this problem and is why it works well in there. Not forgetting the seafront route on a bad day of weather.

Doesn't matter how much it is promoted, it will never catch on.
Oh not really... possible to pedal from Saltdean to Shoreham along the flat (but windy) coast path. Going from Brighton to Lewes is not hill problem but hazardous car and truck problem. Bits of Brighton centre too much of a challenge for myself - but Hove (of which you are ite) is pedalling joy! especialy fine cycle lane on Grand Avenue. And the promise of going up is that one will descend! Powered by gravity!
For sure there is much flat terrain if you only have to commute in the right area, but there are quite a few areas where the non serious cyclist are left pushing their bikes.

Without doing a long list, Elm Grove is not very nice.

CaliforniaGirl says...
11:49pm Wed 4 Jan 12

What was formerly a four-lane road will become two lane....and much more pollution will be generated by the vehicles using the road as they idle in the queue waiting to turn one way or the other... I favour environmental concerns when they may really make a difference...but as a regular user of this road over the past ten years I cannot see ANY advantage to adding a cycle lane and removing a vehicle lane. From an objective point of view it seems laughable to me. What was the point of this expense? What was hoped to be achieved?

Hovite says...
12:14am Thu 5 Jan 12

mustaphaLeeko, you said

"It's not just painted line, they are creating divisions in the road to separate bicycles from cars."

However I have found some artist photo impressions of the scheme which you can see is just a painted lane.

http://www.brighton-
hove.gov.uk/download
s/bhcc/roads/OSR_200
9_Leaflet.pdf

How does this cost £455k?

Hove person says...
2:17am Thu 5 Jan 12

I am delighted! A very happy bunny! I live on the Old Shoreham Road and already the traffic has calmed down. I am looking forward to a nice peaceful month. Before Christmas when there was a 3 way traffic signal at The Drive this road totally changed. All the losers speeding between the speed cameras at Hove Park and just before Bhasvic found other routes. Long may it last!

Cash Cow says...
4:16am Thu 5 Jan 12

Hove person wrote:
I am delighted! A very happy bunny! I live on the Old Shoreham Road and already the traffic has calmed down. I am looking forward to a nice peaceful month. Before Christmas when there was a 3 way traffic signal at The Drive this road totally changed. All the losers speeding between the speed cameras at Hove Park and just before Bhasvic found other routes. Long may it last!
I am a retard! A very happy imbecile! I live on the Old Shoreham Road and already the people who are trying to exist and earn a living are struggling to find an alternative route. I am looking forward to a peaceful month so I can exist without having to be inconvenienced by another living soul. Before the celebration of the birth of our Lord Jesus Christ there was a major event which would change my life forever. All the citizens rushing, trying to get to their place of employment on time to do an honest days work in order to provide for their families had to suffer further inconvenience. Long may Hove Person live happy ever after. The End!

NickBrt says...
8:38am Thu 5 Jan 12

This road closure is causing immense difficulties for the travelling community getting from sites in hove to lewes road sites. The road must be immediately opened to allow them unimpeded access or their rights will have been breached.

Barry Trotter says...
8:47am Thu 5 Jan 12

spacelab wrote:
i drive up and down old shoreham road , sometimes upto four times a day , and never ever see a cyclist on that road , so what is going on is someone taking the pixx out of the motorist, what a waste of money for nothing.
Not seeing cyclists is a common problem for drivers.

Fercri Sakes says...
10:22am Thu 5 Jan 12

tez1959 wrote:
thats typicall always putting cycle lanes in and around brighton and hove i hardly see anyone using them the only cyclist i see are the ones that go through red traffic lights they should start charging them cycle tax if theres so many of them then maybe we could all get a reduction in roadtax on our cars and vans anyone agree
Ha, with such erudite thinking I was surprise to see a lack of punctuation.

And for the 134th time
1) there is no such thing as road tax, just VED based on the polution of your engine.
2) roads are paid out of Council Tax.

Fercri Sakes says...
10:28am Thu 5 Jan 12

thommy wrote:
Why do residents sound surprised at the mentally ill greens deranged vision of shangri La. You have got what you voted for. Greens account for about 0.001% of the uk population and only through their trusty band of temporary resident students have managed to secure their very own socialist playground - Brighton and Hove, to try out all their ludicrous marxist experiments such as; "lets increase the population of travellers in the city by at least 40%", or "how about shutting off the roads and shooing away all those nasty cars, then we can ride our cycles everywhere". People outside Brighton cannot believe what is being done by the council under the orders of the cretinious green administration.
I know they're crazy aren't they. I remember when they built the A27 Brighton Bypass. I argued against it as it would obviously reduce the number of visitors to Brighton. And look at Brighton now, it's a ghost town. Hardly anybody visits, house prices are the lowest in the country, crime is sky high, and not a tourist in site in the summer. :)

lydz25 says...
12:47pm Thu 5 Jan 12

Not to be selfish, but I don't mind it at all.
It's never been easier to cross that road!

Dragon Slayer says...
1:36pm Thu 5 Jan 12

Maxwell's Ghost wrote:
tez1959, do you want cyclists taken off the road and put back in cars and vans?
So you want more people creating traffic?
The more people on bikes means more space for me on the road in my car.
YES ACTUALLY, what we want is them OFF THE PAVEMENTS!

mooog1 says...
11:47am Sat 7 Jan 12

I have been using this stretch of road to cycle to work for years now and have never even had so much as a close call with a car, in my experience I find car drivers to be very considerate indeed.

Although the thought of being knocked off or being crushed out of existence is always in the back of my mind when I am on a cycle lane this fear dissipates then cycling becomes enjoyable.

I think cycle lanes are a fantastic thing and creates an infrastructure that’s far looking into future when petrol prices are prohibitive and people are even more health conscious than they are now, it’s possibly too late for some people and as such only see them as expense and wasteful but trust me I am very grateful to be able to use them and future generations will look back and thank those who had the vision and power to make them possible.

Bryan555 says...
2:30pm Tue 10 Jan 12

Have any of the moaners considered that a better cycling infrastructure will not only make their car journeys quicker in the long run, but will also save the tax payer a considerable sum.

The money saved in quicker journeys (for all, not just cyclists) will easily outweigh what has been spent. That doesn't even include the health and environmental benefits.

My only worry is that it doesn't go far enough. Painting white lines does not work, it just creates extra parking spaces and, consequently, hazards as can be seen in other parts of Brighton.

I hope this doesn't turn out to be another residents parking scheme!

Bryan555 says...
2:31pm Tue 10 Jan 12

Have any of the moaners considered that a better cycling infrastructure will not only make their car journeys quicker in the long run, but will also save the tax payer a considerable sum.

The money saved in quicker journeys (for all, not just cyclists) will easily outweigh what has been spent. That doesn't even include the health and environmental benefits.

My only worry is that it doesn't go far enough. Painting white lines does not work, it just creates extra parking spaces and, consequently, hazards as can be seen in other parts of Brighton.

I hope this doesn't turn out to be another residents parking scheme!

Bryan555 says...
3:27pm Tue 10 Jan 12

CaliforniaGirl wrote:
What was formerly a four-lane road will become two lane....and much more pollution will be generated by the vehicles using the road as they idle in the queue waiting to turn one way or the other... I favour environmental concerns when they may really make a difference...but as a regular user of this road over the past ten years I cannot see ANY advantage to adding a cycle lane and removing a vehicle lane. From an objective point of view it seems laughable to me. What was the point of this expense? What was hoped to be achieved?
1. the part of the road that is having the cycle lane fitter is a single lane.

2. Encouraging cycling reduces pollution. Adding more lanes of traffic increases pollution (California is a good example of this).

3. I think the idea is that separating traffic that moves at different speeds reduces the risk of collision.

4. In the long term it will save money and lives.

Take the Netherlands as an example of how it can improve the economy, safety, culture and health for everybody.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree