News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


C of E free school plan for Hove

A new Christian free secondary could be built to plug a predicted shortfall in school places.

Half of places for the proposed King’s School will be given to students from Christian primary schools, with the rest filled by children of either no faith or of other religions.

The parents behind the school say they are looking at sites in Hove but are keeping details under wraps until they have heard the result of their application to the Department for Education.

Sue Worthing, one of the parents behind the proposal, said there was a shortage of Christian secondary places in Brighton and Hove.

The trained solicitor from Hove said: “We wanted to see a C of E senior school. It is ridiculous that in a town of our size there is only one Christian school which is Cardinal Newman.

“Site wise we are restricted in the city because obviously you could not produce something as large as Newman or even the others because within our geographical area there are simply not the sites.”

The school is planned to cater for up to 750 11 to 16-year-olds.

Mrs Worthing said the group had been in contact with the Diocese of Chichester about the proposed school and is investigating possible links to an existing C of E primary school.

She said the school would be focused on celebrating Christian festivals such as Easter and Christmas.

The King’s School website said it will aim to “inspire” Christian values through the teaching of high moral standards, a discussion-based RE curriculum, collective worship and a full-time chaplaincy.

A quiet space for personal reflection would also be provided.

A Brighton and Hove City Council spokesman confirmed that the authority had had “preliminary contact” with the group behind the King’s School proposal.

What do you think? Does Brighton and Hove need a C of E secondary school? Write to the letters editor or email letters@theargus.co.uk.

More news from The Argus

Daily Echo on Facebook - facebook.com/southerndailyecho Like us on Facebook

Google+ Add us to your circles on Google+

Comments(30)

cancelaccount says...
3:30pm Fri 6 Jan 12

Education should be secular, indoctrination of mythology and superstition should not have a place in school.

Fercri Sakes says...
3:33pm Fri 6 Jan 12

Do we really need more zombie worshipping schools these days? Let's hope they teach the kids that the world is older than 4000 years and that we are decended from apes rather than peddaling lies to vunerable kids.

JohnnyDale says...
3:58pm Fri 6 Jan 12

"Sue Worthing, one of the parents behind the proposal, said there was a shortage of Christian secondary places in Brighton and Hove. "

Correction Ms Worthing. There may or may not be a shortage of secondary places, but there is no more a shortage of "Christain secondary places" that there is "Liberal Democrat secondary places", "Brighton & Hove Albion secondary places", "Sagitarius secondary places" or "Purple is my favourite colour secondary places".

Schools should be for education, not for indoctrination into your favourite cult, or for making sure your kids only know the kids of other parents who think like you.

ghost bus driver says...
4:01pm Fri 6 Jan 12

“Site wise we are restricted in the city because obviously you could not produce something as large as Newman or even the others because within our geographical area there are simply not the sites.”

They've answered their own question here. Short of taking over another school there isn't the space to build another one, particularly a secondary. Besides, the best way to promote Atheism is to build a christian school as the kids will eventually see what a load of old nonsense it is.

voiceofthescoombe says...
4:17pm Fri 6 Jan 12

Considering Brightons one of the more godless towns in the uk.
Should the C of E get Money from the government to increase its cult members?
By offering a chance to get into a new school.

Fight Back says...
4:35pm Fri 6 Jan 12

Just to echo other posts - education should NOT be based on religion. By all means teach what people of each religion believe and their festivals etc but it's wrong that kids are force fed their parents religion at home let alone at school. It's just as stupid baptising children - leave them to make up their own mind later in life. I reject all religion exactly because it was forced on me as a child at home, at school and at clubs such as scouts.

Hard times says...
4:44pm Fri 6 Jan 12

Wholeheartedly agree with sentiments above. The last thing our youth need is brainwashing with that voodoo mumbo jumbo.

pwlr1966 says...
4:56pm Fri 6 Jan 12

I Thought students had to stay in full time education until they were eighteen?

SinisterSpider says...
6:33pm Fri 6 Jan 12

JohnnyDale wrote:
"Sue Worthing, one of the parents behind the proposal, said there was a shortage of Christian secondary places in Brighton and Hove. "

Correction Ms Worthing. There may or may not be a shortage of secondary places, but there is no more a shortage of "Christain secondary places" that there is "Liberal Democrat secondary places", "Brighton & Hove Albion secondary places", "Sagitarius secondary places" or "Purple is my favourite colour secondary places".

Schools should be for education, not for indoctrination into your favourite cult, or for making sure your kids only know the kids of other parents who think like you.
Well said, schools should be for education and not for brainwashing about religious beliefs. Shame on those who bring up their children in that way. They should be allowed to make up their own minds when they got older and not have their parents views forced upon them.

chilliman says...
8:33pm Fri 6 Jan 12

From what I read and hear the non-secular schools are not doing a very good job of educating a large proportion of children. Many faith schools have a far better reputation - maybe because the parents are more involved, maybe because the children and their parents take more responsibility for their behaviour, maybe because the parents make sure that homework is done, maybe because the teachers have more support from the parents, maybe for other reasons.

This country needs more highly educated and motivated people regardless of their religious beliefs.

In my childhood all schools had a christian-based start to the school day with hymns and prayers. I'm not saying this was ideal but it seemed to give the children a better framework to their upbringing rather than just letting them do their own thing from infancy. Lessons were very structured as well which at least seemed to give most children a good grounding in the 3 Rs.

In my teens I belonged to a C of E youth club because that was all there was. Eventually I decided it was not for me but I still know devout people of many faiths including RC, CofE, Islam, Sikh, Hindu, Rasta as well as those who are atheist or agnostic. It isn't their religion but the way of life that religion engenders that counts.

In my opinion main problems are extremism, lack of tolerance and not taking responsibility for ones own actions regardless of what belief system someone has.

There could be worse things than the old saying of "Do Unto Others As You Would Be Done By".

Bladesboy Returns says...
8:54pm Fri 6 Jan 12

Why don't we ask those great people from occupy - you know, the ones who are going to sort the world out - to take control of this?

They could build and run the school from the main field in Preston Park, using tents to keep the costs down and then teach the kids brainwashing rubbish.

Are you in?

Thought not!

alyn, southwick says...
9:01pm Fri 6 Jan 12

yes lets indoctrinate them with secularism instead.
And why should these parents have freedom of choice anyway; only those who want to knock it with their own biased ideals have that right, and exercise it daily here on the Argus site. Where they advocate freedom of speech and choice for all except those with an opposite view.
By the way what proportion have voted in favour of it in the Argus poll?

Hovite says...
9:16pm Fri 6 Jan 12

If parents have a faith and they wish for their children to go to a faith school then fair enough.

Unfortunately a percentage of parents are guilty of pretending to have faith just to get their kids into schools with higher results.

Minion says...
3:25am Sat 7 Jan 12

They should put a 'view results' button on these polls.
If I don't have an opinion on the matter but I'm curious about the opinions of others, I vote randomly just to see the results. If everybody without an opinion did that it would compromise the accuracy of the results.

roseyposey says...
12:49pm Sat 7 Jan 12

Excellent news! ~ would have been great to have had this years ago. I'd like to have attended.

Romans 3:24 says...
1:01pm Sat 7 Jan 12

It's interesting that the "Your Vote" feature above shows 70% of respondents favouring this proposal. And it's a historical fact that the Church of England has made an enormous contribution to the provision of education. Indoctrination isn't part of the mission - it's about faith expressing itself in love to those of christian faith, another faith or none.

ibidi03 says...
3:57pm Sat 7 Jan 12

JohnnyDale wrote:
"Sue Worthing, one of the parents behind the proposal, said there was a shortage of Christian secondary places in Brighton and Hove. "

Correction Ms Worthing. There may or may not be a shortage of secondary places, but there is no more a shortage of "Christain secondary places" that there is "Liberal Democrat secondary places", "Brighton & Hove Albion secondary places", "Sagitarius secondary places" or "Purple is my favourite colour secondary places".

Schools should be for education, not for indoctrination into your favourite cult, or for making sure your kids only know the kids of other parents who think like you.
If there are more parents and children who wish for a Christian Secondary school place than there are places available, then there is a shortage of Christian secondary school places.
Children do not grow up in a vacuum - whatever our world view is, this will have an impact on the way that they think and process information. This is true whether we bring them up in a context of religious faith, or no faith. The responsibility of a parent is to equip the child with the tools they need to evaluate the world views that they come across and to draw their own conclusions. This can be done within a context which teaches respect and the value of others, and challenges individuals to think for themselves, including a context within a Christian ethos. There is a difference between stating your beliefs and striving to live up to them, and indoctrinating people!

Bladesboy Returns says...
7:22am Sun 8 Jan 12

Hovite wrote:
If parents have a faith and they wish for their children to go to a faith school then fair enough.

Unfortunately a percentage of parents are guilty of pretending to have faith just to get their kids into schools with higher results.
What a ridiculous comment, you want to stop taking whatever it is that's affecting your ability to reason and communicate.

What are you actually trying to say here?

Laugh out loud

moronslayer says...
4:28pm Sun 8 Jan 12

We need more faith schools - the nutcases they churn out are hilarious. If we don't have enough christain nutcases then the muslim nutcases may become disallusioned and everyone might end up focusing on problems that are real instead of arguing whose imaginary friend is more powerful.

alyn, southwick says...
5:21pm Sun 8 Jan 12

moronslayer wrote:
We need more faith schools - the nutcases they churn out are hilarious. If we don't have enough christain nutcases then the muslim nutcases may become disallusioned and everyone might end up focusing on problems that are real instead of arguing whose imaginary friend is more powerful.
Can I argue for the existence of Moonslayer - I've never met him/her or spoken to them but I think they must exist. Unless Moonslayer wants to prove they don't and that he/she is just a figment of my imagination.

moronslayer says...
6:42pm Sun 8 Jan 12

Interesting point, you can ask me a question and I'll answer if that helps.

My answer will be straightforward and won't involve smiting anyone. Unlike the almighty I don't have to move in mysterious ways (unless I'm being forced to try and dance at a party).

As knowledge and understanding have increased, religion has needed to use increasingly convoluted explanations and excuses. Like communism, it recently collapsed under the weight of it's internal inconsistencies - which don't get a mention at lesson time though, I wonder why?

Did god offer his servants on earth repeated absolution whilst kiddie-fiddling every week? Are tsunamis a judgement upon godless heathens? Why do still-born infidel babies go to hell? Hope so many of these questions are on the curriculum.

Children shouldn't join cults - every organised religion is drenched in the blood of innocent people. It's perfectly possible to have a strict moral code without chanting contradictory 1000 year old public order notices.

andrewedmondson says...
3:47pm Mon 9 Jan 12

It is difficult to understand why anyone would want to open a new religious school in the UK, apart from to promote a particular religion. Whatever the founders of these schools might say, this is their intention.

The question that no one seems to be able to answer is “What has belief in the supernatural got to do with a good education?” One of the main purposes of education is to teach children how to think and reason properly. Religious belief is blind faith, belief without evidence, and should certainly not be encouraged in school.

Here in West Sussex we are faced with two new religious free schools, whilst attempts to start a non-religious free school in Chichester have failed for several years.

I'm not a support of academies or free schools and think they will be the downfall of education here.

Chris Miles, primary school teacher, will be speaking on behalf of the NUT at a meeting of Chichester Humanists on Monday 23rd January at the Chichester Inn. Her talk is “Faith in school?” and is open to the public to put their points of view. Entry is £3 for non-members, £2 for members, with the usual concessions.

I shall be attending a public consultation about the proposed new Oasis Christian school at the large council chamber, Beeson House, 26 Lintot Square, Southwater on January 19th from 7pm to 8pm. But whatever is said at this meeting will make absolutely no difference.

www.WestSussexHumani
sts.org.uk

alyn, southwick says...
6:00pm Mon 9 Jan 12

andrewedmondson wrote:
It is difficult to understand why anyone would want to open a new religious school in the UK, apart from to promote a particular religion. Whatever the founders of these schools might say, this is their intention.

The question that no one seems to be able to answer is “What has belief in the supernatural got to do with a good education?” One of the main purposes of education is to teach children how to think and reason properly. Religious belief is blind faith, belief without evidence, and should certainly not be encouraged in school.

Here in West Sussex we are faced with two new religious free schools, whilst attempts to start a non-religious free school in Chichester have failed for several years.

I'm not a support of academies or free schools and think they will be the downfall of education here.

Chris Miles, primary school teacher, will be speaking on behalf of the NUT at a meeting of Chichester Humanists on Monday 23rd January at the Chichester Inn. Her talk is “Faith in school?” and is open to the public to put their points of view. Entry is £3 for non-members, £2 for members, with the usual concessions.

I shall be attending a public consultation about the proposed new Oasis Christian school at the large council chamber, Beeson House, 26 Lintot Square, Southwater on January 19th from 7pm to 8pm. But whatever is said at this meeting will make absolutely no difference.

www.WestSussexHumani

sts.org.uk
Freedom is for all;
Freedom to not believe, doubt or even believe if they so choose (and that includes opening faith schools).
Many believers have PERSONAL experiences that make it difficult for them to understand why others don't believe.
No supporter of religious schools commenting on this story have knocked or verbally "smote" those who are against, but everyone against have to some extent dismissed the views of those who do support them.

majestic says...
1:03pm Tue 24 Jan 12

I voted in favour of a new school - but not because we need a faith school (I am TOTALLY against any school with any kind of selective admissions criteria being entitled to take public money; if faith schools wish to operate their churches/mosques/tem
ples etc should fund them, not Joe Public whose kids are excluded from going). I voted 'yes' only because they say half the places will go to non-CofE children and because the school is planned to take only 750 children. Brighton (and the UK) clearly has a shortage of school places, and the schools we do have fall into 2 broad camps: HUGE state secondaries or highly academic and expensive private schools. If you have a child who suffers from anxiety and lack of self confidence (eg, adopted children I know), or is simply quiet and inclined to 'get lost' in crowds (as I was when I was flung into a huge london comprehensive - where I was bullied for five years), yet is not going to pass academic entrance exams or afford private schools, where do you go? I want my kids in a state school that is small enough to be able to offer a calm, orderly environment and to attend to each individual child's needs. Where are such schools? I'm in despair, and secondary school is still three years off for my sprogs!

MrsSKelly says...
6:16pm Wed 25 Jan 12

Why why why are people so angry? If you don't want your child going here don't send them. This school is obviously wanted or it wouldn't be happening.

As for brain washing whether you are sharing ideas on Jesus or the non existence of God young people have their own minds.

My parents are both Christians but I was never brain washing I was educated (my Dad is both a Geologist and a Vicar.) It wasn't until I could think for myself that I made a decision either way. If you are so bothered about the welfare of these young minds give them some credit and let them THINK!

And God forbid a school with high moral values. What will we be teaching these young people next? Self respect and people skills?!

natty1905 says...
4:05pm Mon 30 Jan 12

I hardly think it's a case of forcing your children to be brainwashed. People can teach their kids what they like and choose to send them to whatever school they like.
In terms of belief in God being blind faith I would say that the belief that physical matter was self generating out of nothing in the first instance is the blindest faith of the lot and tends to be the least 'tolerant', the very thing it accuses anyone of being who would prefer not to believe it.

natty1905 says...
4:16pm Mon 30 Jan 12

I can't really understand why people are so against a teaching that says man should love his neighbour as himself but has gone astray and therefore needs forgiveness. If he is reconciled to God through Christ he can also be reconciled to his neighbour and lead the life he was intended to. Is this such a bad thing?
In terms of the old chestnut 'religion causes war', (which I hear about twice a week in Brighton for the last 25 years, yawn), so does sport, family, love, friendship and money. Should we ban all of those too.

natty1905 says...
4:29pm Mon 30 Jan 12

Don't wish to harp on but one more easily refutable point. When you say religion causes more death than anything else, (I presume you mean the crusades or the army of hired thugs who went to the middle east), even bigger yawn, do you mean more than Lenin, Stalin, Pol Pot, Castro, Mao Tse Tung, and Hitler or are we to ignore these.

nigeyb says...
1:27pm Fri 3 Feb 12

Why should the tax payer fund religious instruction? Why aren't all schools aiming to model a tolerant, inclusive society? Schools should be secular. If parents want their children to be brain-washed into believing the unverifiable, then they should do it themselves, and not rely on the tax payer.

alyn, southwick says...
7:58pm Fri 3 Feb 12

nigeyb wrote:
Why should the tax payer fund religious instruction? Why aren't all schools aiming to model a tolerant, inclusive society? Schools should be secular. If parents want their children to be brain-washed into believing the unverifiable, then they should do it themselves, and not rely on the tax payer.
If you're entitled to your opinion so are tax paying church goers - none of whom on this subject have slagged off those opposing them. As I've said before only those against are slagging others off - so who are the tolerant ones. Oh by the way inclusive means including everyone not just those who hold the same opinion as you!

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree