- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@brightonargus
All the latest news and view from the Argus
@theargusoffers
The latest offers and competitions from the Argus
@theargusguide
The best events in Brighton, Hove and Sussex
@ArgusMagazine
Features, interviews, TV, travel and lifestyle from the Argus
- Find us on Facebook
The Argus
The Argus - news, sport and leisure for Brighton, Hove and Sussex
The Argus Offers and Competitions
Keep up to date with all the offers, events and competitions from the Argus
Allotment fees growing in Brighton and Hove (From The Argus)
Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
Allotment fees growing in Brighton and Hove
6:20pm Wednesday 25th January 2012 in News By Tim Ridgway, Local government reporter
Allotments, changing rooms, skips and memorials to loved ones will see price hikes as council chiefs look to balance the books.
Brighton and Hove City Council has signed off on planned increases, claiming it was forced into the rises as it looked to meet Government-imposed cuts.
It added some of the double-digit increases were to cover annual administration and enforcement costs.
But opposition councillors, who said the ending of the historic allotment subsidy seeing a 67% rise over two years, did not “make sense”.
They added they were concerned about the “cumulative impact” the rises would have on users who would also be affected by increases to parking charges and other fees.
Environment cabinet member Pete West said: “The council is operating under unprecedented financial pressure, with the Government cutting our grant by a third over four years.
“We had planned to remove the historic allotment subsidy but, thanks to the prudent financial management of this council, we have been able to stagger this over two years.
“As well as paying for the hire of the plot, the fees cover the cost of maintenance staff, pest control, water provision, fencing and security.
“We have a thriving community of allotment enthusiasts and we are keen to see this continue.”
Among the other things to face double-digit percentage increases in the next financial year are scaffolding (up 61%), skips (up 40% for seven days) and cricket pavilion and pitch hire (up 41%).
Conservative councillor Geoffrey Theobald said: “Allotments are one of the great success stories in Brighton and Hove and it seems to me that the Greens are piggybacking on that success to try to raise extra revenue.
“It does not make sense.”
Labour and Co-op councillor Gill Mitchell said: “There’s a double edge with the allotment increases. If the council puts up charges by this amount the council needs to provide a good service.”
There are 2,919 allotment plots in the city and there are almost 2,000 people on the waiting list.
The increases will come into force on April 1, but they could be altered before then, as they form part of the budget process which will be finalised at a meeting of full council on February 23.
Fees and charges increases
Allotment Rents £33 to £44.20 up 34% (historic subsidy to be fully removed in 2013/14 seeing this rise to £55.40 – up 67%)
Donated Trees (includes Vat) £144 to £288 up 100%
Dedicated Benches (Includes Vat) £569 to £921.85 up 62%
Plaques for dedicated benches (Includes Vat) £114 to £116 up 1.8%
Cricket (with pavilion) £56 to £79 up 41%
Football (with changing rooms) £56 to £80 up 43%
Scaffolding – six weeks £31 to £50 up 61%
Skips
Standard 1 day licence £5 no change
7 day £12 to £20 up 40%
28 days £33 to £40 up 17.5%
Large 1 day new £20
7 day new £40
28 day new £80
A-boards on streets
New application £70 to £85 up 21.4%
Annual renewal fee £49 to £60 up 22.4%
Other increases for recreational use are done by the council’s inflation rate of 2%.
Add us to your circles on Google+
Comments(25)
ray ellerton
says...
7:01pm Wed 25 Jan 12
ray ellerton
says...
7:05pm Wed 25 Jan 12
Wouldnt be so bad if they actually provided pitches which were level, properly marked out and preferably had playable surfaces...
bogs
says...
7:13pm Wed 25 Jan 12
Maxwell's Ghost wrote:Very eloquent, however you just seem to have a chip on BOTH shoulders.
Pete West. It is becoming clear that the Greens are turning this town into a home for the rich only and the poorer are being penalised.
Many allotment holders use their plots to grow food for their families and to subsidise low incomes ie the elderly.
There is a careful balance between crop yield and outlay ie growing crops which will guarantee to produce and crops which can be stored throughout winter to feed a family.
These increases will actually make it difficult for a plot to pay a genuine return, and therefore, allotments will become the home of Preston Park Green voting hobby gardeners who turn up in their 4x4s with fancy sheds and shingle and can afford to pay the fee to potter about and put a few unusual cabbages in the plot and plant fruit trees and flowers.
You are pricing out people who need the land for genuine use.
Utterly disgraceful but not surprising from these urban Greens who think being Green is installing electricity points for cars (even though the electric is generated by coal) and who want to put solar panels on council houses while the bloody windows fall out, and the Greens who allowed people to illegally camp all over our Green spaces during the key breeding species of animals.
Townies the lot of them, with their towny, posh mates pricing out ordinary people.
Pete West you are a disgrace and this is the sort of policy you would expect from the grasping Tories.
Fight Back
says...
7:18pm Wed 25 Jan 12
Maxwell's Ghost
says...
7:34pm Wed 25 Jan 12
In the past few years, these folk have been squeezed out by several increases in the rental of a plot which is making it impossible to make a plot pay so you end up with hobby gardeners on the plot who actually don't really need the plot and yes, they do turn up with massive 4x4s, shingle for the pathways around their raised beds, and half a darned plot of flowers for the windowsill instead of food for the table.
And then they only last two seasons when they realise that turning over a plot once or twice a year is heavy work and nothing like Felicity Kendall's Good Life.
And bog, I would have chips on both shoulders if I could afford the hike in the allotment price to grow my King Edwards, but perhaps my 'dig' unearthed some truth for you.
How's the purple srouting broccoli?
brightonbas
says...
7:41pm Wed 25 Jan 12
Yes i'm right
says...
8:18pm Wed 25 Jan 12
Why, oh why do people believe they should get some special deal because they do s*d all?
And yes, I do grow my own and no I am not rich.
Remember if its too cheap someone else is paying for it....get a life!
sandalman
says...
8:26pm Wed 25 Jan 12
sandalman
says...
8:27pm Wed 25 Jan 12
HJarrs
says...
8:56pm Wed 25 Jan 12
I can't say I am too thrilled by increases in fees or council tax, but this should be laid at the door of those that got us into this mess in the first place i.e. a Labour government and big finance and now savage local grant cutting by the Tories. Recent consultation demonstrated people wanted more services, not fewer.
You should be careful what you wish for locally; we have recently had a Conservative administration that was a waste of space and out of keeping with a forward looking city and a Labour administration that wasted its opportunity to change B&H while times were good.
Fight Back
says...
9:00pm Wed 25 Jan 12
Yes i'm right wrote:Yes, let's make it as expensive as a TV licence - how sensible ! Allotments, as Maxwell's Ghost has mentioned, should be for growing food. Put the price up too much and it becomes cheaper to buy from the supermarket - you know - those devil incarnates called Tesco and Sainsburys that the Greens hate so much. I took on an allotment at £33 a year to grow food for the table and to teach my children where food came from. The allotments are NOT for Yuppies like you "Yes I'm Right" - they are for hard working low paid people. Would you care to pay the increase for me ? It wouldn't be so bad if the council handed over allotments that were vacated BEFORE they over grew but they don't - it took me over a year to clear mine and all they provide for the cost is a little water. The Greens are only interested in one thing - MONEY. Greedy so in so's !
It might be a story if the fees post increase were too high. They still seem ridiculously low to me and should be increased to at least £2 per week absolute minimum and then higher.
Why, oh why do people believe they should get some special deal because they do s*d all?
And yes, I do grow my own and no I am not rich.
Remember if its too cheap someone else is paying for it....get a life!
george smith
says...
9:04pm Wed 25 Jan 12
Maxwell's Ghost wrote:Dead right, plus Brighton residents put their names on neighbouring councils lists, which are cheaper
Pete West. It is becoming clear that the Greens are turning this town into a home for the rich only and the poorer are being penalised. Many allotment holders use their plots to grow food for their families and to subsidise low incomes ie the elderly. There is a careful balance between crop yield and outlay ie growing crops which will guarantee to produce and crops which can be stored throughout winter to feed a family. These increases will actually make it difficult for a plot to pay a genuine return, and therefore, allotments will become the home of Preston Park Green voting hobby gardeners who turn up in their 4x4s with fancy sheds and shingle and can afford to pay the fee to potter about and put a few unusual cabbages in the plot and plant fruit trees and flowers. You are pricing out people who need the land for genuine use. Utterly disgraceful but not surprising from these urban Greens who think being Green is installing electricity points for cars (even though the electric is generated by coal) and who want to put solar panels on council houses while the bloody windows fall out, and the Greens who allowed people to illegally camp all over our Green spaces during the key breeding species of animals. Townies the lot of them, with their towny, posh mates pricing out ordinary people. Pete West you are a disgrace and this is the sort of policy you would expect from the grasping Tories.
Alan Phillips
says...
9:53pm Wed 25 Jan 12
Maxwell's Ghost
says...
12:01am Thu 26 Jan 12
Pete West do you actually know anything about the environment, agriculture or people, apart from the features you have read in The Guardian environment section?
Do you know that £66 will mean people wont grown enough veg to cover the cost of the plot?
george smith
says...
6:50am Thu 26 Jan 12
Maxwell's Ghost wrote:However he was very keen to cut down the oak trees in wild park, I have been told there were 177 of them, take the money from government funding and put sheep there, which we pay, I was also told £2 a week for each sheep. Then there is the problem of the travellers yet again on the top of the park
This is lazy economics by an out-of-touch administration. All we have seen is cut, cut, cut, cut and increase, increase, increase, hitting working people the hardest and this issue will hit those who try to support thier own families without asking for State handouts. Pete West do you actually know anything about the environment, agriculture or people, apart from the features you have read in The Guardian environment section? Do you know that £66 will mean people wont grown enough veg to cover the cost of the plot?
Yes i'm right
says...
7:16am Thu 26 Jan 12
Fight Back wrote:Maybe, just maybe you should take a little extra time reading comments before commenting.
Yes i'm right wrote:Yes, let's make it as expensive as a TV licence - how sensible ! Allotments, as Maxwell's Ghost has mentioned, should be for growing food. Put the price up too much and it becomes cheaper to buy from the supermarket - you know - those devil incarnates called Tesco and Sainsburys that the Greens hate so much. I took on an allotment at £33 a year to grow food for the table and to teach my children where food came from. The allotments are NOT for Yuppies like you "Yes I'm Right" - they are for hard working low paid people. Would you care to pay the increase for me ? It wouldn't be so bad if the council handed over allotments that were vacated BEFORE they over grew but they don't - it took me over a year to clear mine and all they provide for the cost is a little water. The Greens are only interested in one thing - MONEY. Greedy so in so's !
It might be a story if the fees post increase were too high. They still seem ridiculously low to me and should be increased to at least £2 per week absolute minimum and then higher.
Why, oh why do people believe they should get some special deal because they do s*d all?
And yes, I do grow my own and no I am not rich.
Remember if its too cheap someone else is paying for it....get a life!
As I wrote, I grow my own!
Suggest you stop drinking and smoking and pay the extra!
Joshiman
says...
9:23am Thu 26 Jan 12
SteveHove
says...
10:31am Thu 26 Jan 12
Argus
says...
10:53am Thu 26 Jan 12
Alan Phillips wrote:Alan, in 2011, the council, in their wisdom, altered the size of a plot from 10 rods to 5 rods, so you now rent two plots, making it £66.
The cost of an allotment is £66 today not £33. If you want to see more back ground look at my Argus blog on £110 Lottie- its a rich man's world.
Also in their wisdom, they now give out the new sized half plots to newcomers, that's two and a half rods, big enough for a shed, a water butt and two cabbages.
Your cost will rise to £110.80 over the next two years, I have two old, now four new size plots, and I think that with the rising costs, and the thefts of crops, it will not be worthwhile in the future and this will be the last year that I rent them.
Falstaff
says...
5:39pm Thu 26 Jan 12
Argus
says...
12:02am Fri 27 Jan 12
brightonbas wrote:brightonbas, not bas"sam" by any chance?
Rent may increased at any time provided the council takes reasonable
steps to give at least six months notice by way of signs on notice
boards and gates, or by news letters etc. Failure to give notice to any
individual tenant will not invalidate the tenants rent increase.
Whatever, you sound as if you are a spokesman for the council.
Do you work for them?
samslottie
says...
7:14pm Sun 29 Jan 12
In 1981 judgement on the Harwood v Borough of Reigate and Banstead held that it was unlawful for local authorities to discriminate against allotment holders by applying higher increases against them as compared with the increases applied against the users of other council owned recreational facilities. Are the council to rise other recreational facilities in lline with this increase?
Secondly, the Election Manifesto states that the Greens will 'provide more land for local food growing'. So why is the Environment minister Pete West planning to subdivide allotments again? This will not provide any more ground for local people to grow food, it will give less land per person.
The Green Party are meeting to agree to the allotment rises on February 9th.I would urge the Green Party to reconsider the proposed rises when they meet and the effect it will have on people who may otherwise have been sympathetic to green principles.
GreenUnpleasantLand
says...
10:22am Thu 2 Feb 12
Zero.
Nada.
Thanks a lot Greens
Thanks a lot
We will fight back
We will win
MarkBrighton
says...
2:26pm Tue 14 Feb 12
link below.. if it doesnt work google 'green council cuts subsidy allotments facebook'
http://www.facebook.
com/pages/Stop-the-G
reen-Council-in-Brig
hton-ending-the-Allo
tments-subsidy/10776
9532685572
Maxwell's Ghost says...
6:38pm Wed 25 Jan 12
Many allotment holders use their plots to grow food for their families and to subsidise low incomes ie the elderly.
There is a careful balance between crop yield and outlay ie growing crops which will guarantee to produce and crops which can be stored throughout winter to feed a family.
These increases will actually make it difficult for a plot to pay a genuine return, and therefore, allotments will become the home of Preston Park Green voting hobby gardeners who turn up in their 4x4s with fancy sheds and shingle and can afford to pay the fee to potter about and put a few unusual cabbages in the plot and plant fruit trees and flowers.
You are pricing out people who need the land for genuine use.
Utterly disgraceful but not surprising from these urban Greens who think being Green is installing electricity points for cars (even though the electric is generated by coal) and who want to put solar panels on council houses while the bloody windows fall out, and the Greens who allowed people to illegally camp all over our Green spaces during the key breeding species of animals.
Townies the lot of them, with their towny, posh mates pricing out ordinary people.
Pete West you are a disgrace and this is the sort of policy you would expect from the grasping Tories.