News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Two ports in running for Sussex wind farm base

Two Sussex ports are still in the running to maintain a proposed wind farm.

Shoreham Port and Newhaven Port are both hoping to secure the project to maintain the Rampion wind farm, which would lie eight miles off the coast between Brighton and Newhaven.

E.ON unveiled the plans for between 100 and 195 wind turbines at a consultation last week.

Rampion project manager Vaughan Weighill said: “We are looking at both Shoreham and Newhaven for the operation and maintenance base. One of the benefits of the project, currently estimated, is the creation of between 65 and 85 full-time jobs.”

Newhaven Port Authority has listed “current opportunities” in offshore wind as one of its five key strategic objectives.

However, Mr Weighill insisted the project is still in its infancy but is hopeful that a planning application can be put in by the summer following the public consultation.

It would then be as long as two years before work will start.

Mr Weighill claimed that Rampion could lead to an increase of eco-tourism to the Sussex coast.

He said a similar wind farm in Great Yarmouth sees 40,000 visitors a year, including school trips.

The wind farm would generate enough energy to power more than two out of every three homes in Sussex, including the whole of Brighton and Hove.

Mr Weighill said of the Rampion: “This is a nationally significant project. A project of this scale takes between two to three years from the very start of the work.”

A 12-week consultation, including a series of exhibitions, is being held across the county to allow people to comment on the proposals.

These include details of the route the cable will be laid underground if it gets the go-ahead.

Dates and locations of the exhibitions can be found at the Argus's story: Sussex coast wind farm vision revealed.

More news from The Argus

Daily Echo on Facebook - facebook.com/southerndailyecho Like us on Facebook

Google+ Add us to your circles on Google+

Comments(7)

oldieish says...
1:45pm Wed 15 Feb 12

Wind farms, a waste of concrete, copper, precision bearings, time, money and whatever else is invested therein. Unreliable, inconsistent providers of electricity that merely tinker at the edges of our energy requirements.

HangletonVic says...
2:42pm Wed 15 Feb 12

And lets not forget the poor marine life that will be disturbed... Sad times.

Tony Harrison says...
4:27pm Wed 15 Feb 12

I agree, this is terrible news. When will the authorities realise that the future of energy is in burning more fossil fuels and buliding nuclear power stations next to urban areas. That's what we all want! Who wants to have a few windmills miles out in the sea that you can barely see that provides sustainable energy from natural sources for years to come, when we can live in smog-infested nuclear-waste-pollut
ed cities? Not me! All this "green" stuff is a waste of time - burn more oil for goodness sakes!!!

norfolkboy14 says...
4:59pm Wed 15 Feb 12

We need to get the Government onside, as well as local councils and others, if we are going to stop these wind turbines being built.

Are you disillusioned by rising electricity prices, over dependence on the "green" dream then please register your objection to the Government by GOOGLING "E-PETITION 22958" and following the link.

Please pass this message on to Councillors, members of your community and anyone else you know to persuade them to sign up too. If you are really concerned about wind turbines please write a letter promoting this petition to your community newsletters and the Editors of your local newspapers.

twosugars says...
8:26pm Wed 15 Feb 12

Tony Harrison wrote:
I agree, this is terrible news. When will the authorities realise that the future of energy is in burning more fossil fuels and buliding nuclear power stations next to urban areas. That's what we all want! Who wants to have a few windmills miles out in the sea that you can barely see that provides sustainable energy from natural sources for years to come, when we can live in smog-infested nuclear-waste-pollut ed cities? Not me! All this "green" stuff is a waste of time - burn more oil for goodness sakes!!!
The wind farm is a good thing as it leaves more of the oil reserves to provide diesel for my 4X4 Range rover!. On a serious note, why build wind turbine that dont work if there is too much or too little wind? another option is the thousands of miles of rivers that could be used to provide hydro electric power. The River thames alone has 45 locks that just waste water over weirs. Unobtrusive, easy to mantain turbines that dont disrupt wildlife and fish stocks like the one being fitted at Romney lock near Windsor castle would generate power 24/7 and there are many other rivers in the Uk that are suitable.

Twittern Wanderer says...
5:35pm Thu 16 Feb 12

Derek Sorensen said...

"Interesting article on the BBC today, about a new report from conservation group The John Muir Trust, following an analysis of 2 years worth of Wind Power generation statistics. It's pretty damning.

The report examines these popular assertions:

1. "Wind turbines will generate on average 30% of their rated capacity over a year."

2. "The wind is always blowing somewhere."

3. "Periods of widespread low wind are infrequent."

4. "The probability of very low wind output coinciding with peak electricity demand is slight."

5. "Pumped storage hydro can fill the generation gap during prolonged low wind periods."



And finds that:

1. Average output from wind was 27.18% of metered capacity in 2009, 21.14% in 2010, and 24.08% between November 2008 and December 2010 inclusive.

2. There were 124 separate occasions from November 2008 till December 2010 when total generation from the windfarms metered by National Grid was less than 20MW. (Average capacity over the period was in excess of 1600MW).

3. The average frequency and duration of a low wind event of 20MW or less between November 2008 and December 2010 was once every 6.38 days for a period of 4.93 hours.

4. At each of the four highest peak demands of 2010 wind output was low being respectively 4.72%, 5.51%, 2.59% and 2.51% of capacity at peak demand.

5. The entire pumped storage hydro capacity in the UK can provide up to 2788MW for only 5 hours then it drops to 1060MW, and finally runs out of water after 22 hours.

To summarise.. THEY DO NOT WORK!

've been banging on about how rubbish Wind Farms are for years, but finally someone has taken the time to look at the actual figures. We can but hope that this will see an end to the defacement of England's Green and Pleasant land by these monstrosities, not to mention the millions of pounds of taxpayers money which is wasted on this useless technology every year.

oldieish says...
11:35pm Thu 16 Feb 12

Tony Harrison wrote:
I agree, this is terrible news. When will the authorities realise that the future of energy is in burning more fossil fuels and buliding nuclear power stations next to urban areas. That's what we all want! Who wants to have a few windmills miles out in the sea that you can barely see that provides sustainable energy from natural sources for years to come, when we can live in smog-infested nuclear-waste-pollut

ed cities? Not me! All this "green" stuff is a waste of time - burn more oil for goodness sakes!!!
Unfortunately energy provision needs to be consistent and consistently reliable. Mr. Harrison's "a few windmills" translates into a planned 100 to 195 wind turbines.

The output capacity of these generators is not specified however a modest farm of twenty 1 megawatt turbines would require upwards of 10,000 tonnes of concrete to manufacture. Concrete is not a carbon-neutral material to manufacture. Nor is it pollution free when immersed in sea water.

Average demand for electricity in the UK is about 50 gigawatts (1000 x 50 megawatts) per hour. According to data provided by the National Grid Seven Year Statements, peak demand in 2005/6 was 63 gigawatts which represented approximately 80% of total capacity (80 gigawatts).

Demand for electricity is continual and needs reliable supply. Nuclear, solar, geothermal and gassification of coal seams (followed by carbon capture and scrubbing when burnt) provide more consistent means of generation. Wind and wave power as a solution to our national demand for energy is a chimera that deflects us from identifying and developing adult solutions to our needs.

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree