Church’s regret at paedophile clergy (From The Argus)
Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
Church’s regret at paedophile clergy
4:20pm Friday 2nd March 2012 in News By Ben Parsons
The Church of England has offered an “unreserved apology” for historic cases of child abuse by some members of its clergy.
Officials said it was a matter of “great sorrow and deep regret” and they recognised the harm caused to the victims.
The apology coincided with the publication of another critical report detailing how convicted paedophile Roy Cotton went on to be ordained as a priest.
Cotton was convicted of indecent behaviour with a child in 1954 aged 25 while in training for the priesthood. Further damaging allegations were made against him years later.
He was dismissed from theological college, later sacked from a prep school following claims made by boys and banned by the Scout movement.
But despite his criminal past, he was readmitted to theological training and was ordained in 1966, the same year he was at theological college with his friend Colin Pritchard – later jailed for child abuse.
Access to young people
The Scouts agreed to relicense Cotton after he apparently persuaded his diocesan supporters to lobby the movement, the report by independent reviewer Roger Meekings said.
It said: “This was a significant step as it resulted in Cotton receiving ‘authorised’ and unsupervised access to young people in organised groups.
"It enabled him to be regarded as an authority figure and a person ‘of trust’ by parents.”
In 1997 Cotton and Pritchard were arrested by Sussex Police detectives on suspicion of sexually abusing children.
Cotton retired in 1999 and in the same year the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) decided to drop its case against the pair. Cotton died in 2006.
Pritchard, who was vicar at St Barnabas Church in Bexhill-on-sea, East Sussex, was jailed for five years at Northampton Crown Court in 2008 after pleading guilty to abusing two children from 1979 to 1983.
The Archbishop of Canterbury banned him from exercising any priestly ministry for life.
Procedures not followed
The Meekings report said the way Cotton came to be ordained and how he was given the green light as a Scout leader was “fraught with concerns and questions”.
Cotton managed to achieve both due to the time that had elapsed since his conviction in 1954 and because senior officers played down the seriousness of it, the report added.
Procedures in sharing information were not followed and the victims were denied the opportunity of being believed, it went on.
Concern was also raised about the issuing of licences to allow both Pritchard and Cotton to continue acting as priests after they retired, particularly as Cotton’s conviction from 1954 was known to the church authorities.
A series of recommendations was made, including training senior staff in the diocese in the management of allegations and establish a diocesan child protection management group.
Add us to your circles on Google+
Comments(12)
PETE OF QUEENS PARK
says...
7:28pm Fri 2 Mar 12
Lostandaway
says...
8:49pm Fri 2 Mar 12
What do words "unreserved apology" and "great sorrow and deep regret" supposed to do for those who suffered.
Those of us who spent time in children's homes know only to well what it's like and when you look to the establishment for help, it's often not forthcoming.
There is NO JUSTICE. These people con their way into people's thinking and so those who are supposed to know and want to justify their training go out on Social excercsies for which there is absolutely no validity.
TIME AND TIME AGAIN CHILDREN ARE SUFFERING AND WE HAVE TO SIT AND WATCH THE NEWS WITH ALL THE WEASEL WORDS.
They are all excuses for institutional incompetance and those involved in over-seeing should be expressing total shame in failure in solving the problem ie these characters committing these crimes should be locked away permanently for the sake of future children and VICTIMS. NOT FOR THE SOCIAL TINKERING OF THOSE WHO ARE PAID BY US TO PROTECT US.
rolivan
says...
9:08pm Fri 2 Mar 12
Bladesboy Returns
says...
7:25am Sat 3 Mar 12
rolivan wrote:I thought our resident religion expert alyn, southwick would have posted to defend his lot by now and then of course to register a complaint against all the people who have registered their valid comments. Probably been banned from this site as should the church and all the miscreants / paedo's who play in that space.
It is like listening to a record that has got stuck ,forgive me Father for I have sinned ,well it can be our secret.
Sickening!
alyn, southwick
says...
7:53am Sat 3 Mar 12
By the way I am not a peado or a miscreant of any fashion, to keep implying I am is sickening (as well as libellous). My job involves helping those abused, so I have been checked. But unless another libellous comment is made I can't be bothered to report anyone. Others may, in the interests of open fair and truly VALID comments.
Bladesboy Returns
says...
8:22am Sat 3 Mar 12
I find its always worth taking time out to read the comments carefully and understand them before reacting inappropriately and posting ridiculous responses.
papa_melons
says...
1:18pm Sat 3 Mar 12
Bladesboy Returns wrote:hence the reason you are a tiresome one trick pony
"The lady doth protest too much, methinks." springs to mind.
I find its always worth taking time out to read the comments carefully and understand them before reacting inappropriately and posting ridiculous responses.
Bladesboy Returns
says...
8:31pm Sat 3 Mar 12
papa_melons wrote:Hence the reason your comments are laughable, at best...waster
Bladesboy Returns wrote:hence the reason you are a tiresome one trick pony
"The lady doth protest too much, methinks." springs to mind.
I find its always worth taking time out to read the comments carefully and understand them before reacting inappropriately and posting ridiculous responses.
Helmut Polisher
says...
11:11pm Sat 3 Mar 12
Helmut Polisher
says...
2:39pm Sun 4 Mar 12
Helmut Polisher
says...
2:50pm Mon 5 Mar 12
Bladesboy Returns wrote:Yes, we have noticed you often do react and post ridiculously inappropriate responses.
"The lady doth protest too much, methinks." springs to mind.
I find its always worth taking time out to read the comments carefully and understand them before reacting inappropriately and posting ridiculous responses.
We are all somewhat surprised that you say you take time to read and understand them though!
thewhitehawker says...
6:34pm Fri 2 Mar 12