Smash EDO's "moral duty" to protest (From The Argus)

• "

  gaz scott wrote:
  

  Bladesboy Returns wrote:
  

  gaz scott wrote:
  

  Bladesboy Returns wrote:
  

  gaz scott wrote:
  

  Gazzer Scott, Bright I'm Not wrote:
  

  gaz scott wrote:
  

  Gazzer Scott, Bright I'm Not wrote:
  Just got in from work - some people on this thread may not be familiar with this - and have spent 10 minutes rolling around laughing at the comments posted by zrfau and my close friend gaz scott...bright he's definitely not!
  
  So in summary before I close this thread, we have less than 0.001% of the population who are so stupid they can't grasp the value that is being created and maintained by this company and this same 0.001% won't listen to the sensible people.
  
  What is this all about?

  "So in summary before I close this thread"
  
  So you run this site do you? What an idiot.
  
  I don't generally agree with banning people from lists but I hope the Argus ban you again. You certainly should be.
  
  Aren't you embarrassed to be you Bladesboy? I would be.

  You have made a further 5 posts since attacking my valid and proportionate comments and each one provides an insight into your inner anger.
  
  How can't you see from all the people who are sharing reality with you that you hold ridiculous and fundamentally flawed views?
  
  Your inner anger needs addressing and not through a childish outburst in the streets of Brighton. Why not seek counselling support, if money is tight then let me know and I'll see if I can help out. Much better that, than ruining what should be a nice day of relaxation for thousands of good people.
  
  Before we move to close this thread, you have actively avoided responding to comments made in previous threads re the part you play in recycling, which I have suggested makes you culpable for lubricating the supply chain for EDO. Perhaps if you are not too angry you might provide your views on this? Can't wait to see your attempts at manipulating the truth to fit your 0.001 model. Laugh out loud!

  How do you fit in all your Argus list moderation with your busy life?
  
  Your post and opinions only seem to be based around the idea that our beliefs are flawed or misguided and that yours are right and proper.
  
  You never explain why this is so. You usually resort to childish tactics mostly because you are childish but also because you don't have the facility to do anything else.

  Just signed in and see you are up to your old tricks gazzer scott, 'bright I'm not'. Attack others comments, refuse to address the valid comments and concerns raised by others in response to yours etc.
  
  Please simply tell us your philosophy on recycling and how you manage the risk associated with funding the supply chain through your actions and mitigation.
  
  Look forward to hearing the same old, same old.

  Nice to see you using your real name again Bladesboy.
  
  Apart from the fact that my views on recycling are irrelevant I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. You are, as usual, talking in riddles and nonsense. If you phrased the question in English you might have more chance of a reply.

  Your name provides clues, as in Bright I'm Not!
  
  So for your benefit and for absolute clarity and in Janet and John primary school language, here we go.
  
  Hypothesis:-
  
  You recycle some of the materials you have either purchased, or been provided with.
  
  This material through the recycling process is recovered and then in turn is purchased / passed to manufacturers who in turn use/convert these materials into goods
  
  EDO may therefore receive and reuse materials that you have provided
  
  You are therefore potentially supporting EDO
  
  Questions
  
  Do you recycle your goods and if so, how do you ensure that the goods you recycle do not ultimately make their way into the EDO (or indeed other organisations allegedly involved in the supply of arms) manufacturing processes?
  
  Hopefully, even you can now grasp the question and maybe answer it!

  Thanks for rephrasing the question into English and removing the phoney and nonsensical "corporate speak".
  
  The answer is it's impossible to have any influence on that any more than we can directly influence the £13k per employee subsidy paid annually at Tax Payers expense paid to the Arms Industry.
  
  The fact that we may all ALL be responsible in some small way for crimes carried out in OUR name either inadvertently, knowingly or unknowingly by simply living in the society which perpetrates them does not make it wrong to speak out or protest about them.
  
  Nor does it mean people should not recycle our finite resources just in case some war profiteers ultimately use the recycled materials.

  I can't understand what you are trying to say, perhaps you could provide a response in simple English that addresses the points / questions I raised. A bit less anger and vitriol may assist and feel free to consider your words before you provide them. Better to have a clear and well thought through response than a few words that are nonsensical and don't provide clarity.
  
  The floor is yours and p.s. calm down a tad."
• * Your name This field is mandatory
• * Your email This field is mandatory
• Reason

  Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.

• 
  Enter the above word in the box below
  
  

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.