Report this comment
  • "
    Ashles wrote:
    "then you would know that when someone thinks they need to go underneath these Tanning machines more than is good for them, then they will find a way."
    Of course, where did I say otherwise? Especially as the scheme is optional. But it may have made some people think about how often they go under - this would generally be a good thing.

    "England is the most observed society in Europe!"
    is it? How sweet. And this is relevent because... ?

    "To see something like fingerprinting being used to control the amount of tanning you do is in my opinion (even if optional) way over the top."
    And in mine too. I never said otherwise.

    "Just one other thing that has to be repeated here. The sun studio firm bringing in this technology, has stated that the programm they use is completely safe. That is just plain stupidity to say something like that in this day & age of cyber crime. I would give the program they are using at the most 6 months & it will rendered useless because it has been hacked!! "
    Oh no! Then the terrorists will know who in Brighton likes to get tanned! I can see why this would be a massive cause for concern.
    You make the point above that if someone really wants to get a tan more often than they should, they will find away.
    In that case I think it's safe yo say that it's many times more likely that if someone really wants your fingerprints and/or credit card details, there are easier ways to get them than hacking a tanning shop.

    "Incidently, what are the full facts? You seem to be in the know, then tell us. Put things right just do not write such things without writing something to back up your statement!"
    This is a bit weird. I have commented on the story above (which we can all read) and then the Tanning Shop's own response to the original story.
    What important facts are missing that are vital for you to get a more 'complete' view? It's not really that complex a story.
    Do you work for the Mail or something?
    You left me & maybe others the impression that the Argus for all its woes, had reported misleading & not all the facts relating to this article.
    I do not waste my time with the Mail. You though obviously do. So therefore I am not surprised with your attempt at answering my comments sensibly.
    You should think about a future in politics. Your slippery answers & sarcasam would fit in there very well."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

Brighton tanning salon uses fingerprint scanners

Secret agent-style fingerprint scanners are being used – in a tanning salon.

Hundreds of people using The Tanning Shop in Western Road, Brighton, have been asked to provide copies of their fingerprints when they want to top up on their tan.

Privacy campaigners called the move “absurd”.

Operators of the shop maintain the scheme is completely legal, adding that it was being “responsible” so users could not tan more than once every 24 hours.

One user, who did want to be named, said: “I do not see the sense behind it to be honest.

“I have never had to give my fingerprints ever, not even when I got a passport. It’s just stupid.”

The firm, which runs the system across nearly 60 shops in the UK, told customers the technology was to “protect your minutes and yourself from tanning within the normal 24-hour restriction between sessions”.

All new customers are asked to provide four separate scans of their fingerprints.

The firm said the image then goes through one-way encryption and is stored securely as a text document.

In a written statement, it added “it is not possible to convert the text data back into a fingerprint”.

The firm said all clients had the option to opt out of the biometric system by writing or speaking to a member of its head office team where account access was restricted.

Nick Pickles, director of civil liberties and privacy campaign group Big Brother Watch, said: “This is a tanning shop, not a maximum security spy base. It is an absurd use of technology that is intended to track people’s behaviour.”

Chelle Lahmers, of The Tanning Shop, said the system complied with the Data Protection Act.

She said: “We are dedicated not only to the promotion and application of responsible tanning practices, but committed to preserving the integrity and security of client accounts in full compliance with current legislation.

“The use of biometrics is not only applied as a matter of account access restriction, but to ensure that clients are not able to tan more than once in a 24 hour period.

“The majority of clients embrace not only the convenience of this access method but the account security that it affords them.”

What do you think?

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree