Brighton mum wins bid to unmask Facebook bullies

Brighton mum wins bid to unmask Facebook bullies Brighton mum wins bid to unmask Facebook bullies

An ill mother has won a landmark legal battle to unmask the online bullies who have tormented her.

Brighton woman Nicola Brookes, who was hounded by “trolls” impersonating her on Facebook, took the social networking site to the High Court to demand it hand over the perpetrators’ details.

Ms Brookes, who suffers from chronic Crohn’s Disease, suffered “unbearable” online taunts and insults after posting a comment online in support of Woodingdean X-Factor contestant Frankie Cocozza.

At the High Court a judge ordered Facebook to release the personal details of the offenders, which the US-based company has agreed to do under Californian law.

Now Facebook, which did not contest the order, has four weeks to supply everything it knows about the individuals who made Ms Brookes’ life a misery.

Ms Brookes said: “These people are breaking the law so it is fantastic that we should now be able to find out who they are.

“Hopefully these people are now scared in the same way that I was scared when they were harassing me.”

Four months ago The Argus launched the Safer Surfing campaign to put pressure on Sussex Police to dedicate officers to the detection and arrest of cyber bullies.

Embarrassment

Ms Brookes’ lawyer said the High Court ruling was “an embarrassment” for the force.

Rupinder Bains, a senior partner at Bains Cohen, said: “It should have been the police’s job to get these details from Facebook but they have completely failed in their responsibility to do that.

“After the ruling a senior officer even called to congratulate us on winning the case. But the whole point is that the police should have been dealing with this from the start.

“It should never have taken a private action to help bring these people to justice.”

A spokesman for Sussex Police said: “We have looked at the material sent to us by Ms Brookes and we have told Facebook to remove anything offensive or abusive towards her.

“The matter is still the subject of an active police investigation and has recently been reviewed.

“We are also seeking information from Facebook and the fact that the High Court has given authority to apply for the information required from Facebook is welcomed and may help our investigation.”

A Facebook spokesman said: “There is no place for harassment on Facebook, but unfortunately a small minority of malicious individuals exist online, just as they do offline.

“We respect our legal obligations and work with law enforcement to ensure that such people are brought to justice.”

Comments(13)

banargustrolls says...
10:28am Fri 8 Jun 12

Excellent

Ralph says...
10:59am Fri 8 Jun 12

I'm not surprised the Police have received some criticism on this topic. Their resources are being squeezed and this is an entirely new form of criminal activity which demands a new level of understanding by investigators. Hopefully the Argus campaign will continue to encourage action - I suspect a dedicated task force will once day be 'announced' by an opportunistic politician at Westminster. Suggested twitter hashtag for that day #whiteknight

LB says...
11:01am Fri 8 Jun 12

"We respect our legal obligations and work with law enforcement to ensure that such people are brought to justice."

so why did she have to get a court order for them to release the details?

Goldenwight says...
11:18am Fri 8 Jun 12

Ms Brookes, who suffers from chronic Crohn’s Disease, suffered “unbearable” online taunts and insults after posting a comment online in support of Woodingdean X-Factor contestant Frankie Cocozza.

Now, I've never seen this show, nor do I use Facebook. So this story seems more than a little unreal to me. I really ought to join the 21st century and investigate, I suppose...

voiceofthescoombe says...
11:52am Fri 8 Jun 12

She had to get a court order because its the law.
Do you want facebook handing your personal data to anyone because somebody complained?

fredaj says...
1:11pm Fri 8 Jun 12

LB wrote:
"We respect our legal obligations and work with law enforcement to ensure that such people are brought to justice." so why did she have to get a court order for them to release the details?
You need a court order because Facebook cannot release personal information about people willy-nilly, just because someone asks for it.

Number Six says...
1:13pm Fri 8 Jun 12

Goldenwight wrote:
Ms Brookes, who suffers from chronic Crohn’s Disease, suffered “unbearable” online taunts and insults after posting a comment online in support of Woodingdean X-Factor contestant Frankie Cocozza. Now, I've never seen this show, nor do I use Facebook. So this story seems more than a little unreal to me. I really ought to join the 21st century and investigate, I suppose...
I'd keep it that way, if I were you.

I've never seen Britain's Got Strictly No Celebrity X-Factor and I never will. I joined Facebook to see what the fuss was about and was bored rigid in five minutes. I'm thinking of starting a new website: Shut Your Facebook

Wiggsy says...
1:17pm Fri 8 Jun 12

Ralph wrote:
I'm not surprised the Police have received some criticism on this topic. Their resources are being squeezed and this is an entirely new form of criminal activity which demands a new level of understanding by investigators. Hopefully the Argus campaign will continue to encourage action - I suspect a dedicated task force will once day be 'announced' by an opportunistic politician at Westminster. Suggested twitter hashtag for that day #whiteknight
Given how other Argus campaigns have generally slipped quietly away without any real noticeable impact to the (notable) causes it has supported then I wouldn't hold your breath.

atlantis88 says...
3:22pm Fri 8 Jun 12

Number Six wrote:
Goldenwight wrote:
Ms Brookes, who suffers from chronic Crohn’s Disease, suffered “unbearable” online taunts and insults after posting a comment online in support of Woodingdean X-Factor contestant Frankie Cocozza. Now, I've never seen this show, nor do I use Facebook. So this story seems more than a little unreal to me. I really ought to join the 21st century and investigate, I suppose...
I'd keep it that way, if I were you.

I've never seen Britain's Got Strictly No Celebrity X-Factor and I never will. I joined Facebook to see what the fuss was about and was bored rigid in five minutes. I'm thinking of starting a new website: Shut Your Facebook
Number Six - would you please stop making me laugh !!!!

Angryoldman says...
3:24pm Fri 8 Jun 12

Good on her.

Morpheus says...
8:49pm Fri 8 Jun 12

This took a lot of courage. The sooner Faceless is closed down and the investors lose their money the better.

Maxwell's Ghost says...
12:05am Sat 9 Jun 12

What astonishes me about the Internet is that people post vast amounts of info about themselves on social media and other sites.
Are people unaware of the risk to their own personal details?
I can tell you that as a journalist I used to spend hours door knocking and collecting info for stories. No more. Yesterday it took me 20 minutes to get an individual's personal details from the internet which included address, properties owned, mortgages held and with which banks, business accounts, names and addresses of family and children and all mobile telephone numbers, full cv, education and work history, cars owned, reviews of consumer goods, children's clubs etc and I didn't even seek most of the info. It was just there in a few clicks.
All on the Internet on sites in the public domain. No hacking, no illegal activity all in the public domain on legal websites using Google.
I find it quite terrifying. George Orwell thought Big Brother would be watching but he failed to realise that big brother didn't need to as people are actually posting everything for anyone to see.

all_cats_are_grey says...
11:35am Wed 13 Jun 12

@ Maxwell's Ghost...

The problem here is not that information was available. The problem is that what was available was used for the purpose of harassing and causing harm to an individual.

I get your point that people are often (sometimes unknowingly) too open with their information, but the fact remains that to be open is not a crime. What is a crime is to take information and use it to attack someone else or steal from them or damage their reputation.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree