Report this comment
  • "
    Kat2675 wrote:
    ghost bus driver wrote:
    HJarrs wrote:
    Labour and the Conservatives joined together to prevent a modest council tax rise and now have the cheek to complain about the cuts that their populist decision (supported by the Argus) has caused.

    What is not made clear above is; are the services being totally cut, cut back in hours, or route curtailed at times nor is there mention of passenger numbers using the routes? Also, where is the comparison with proposed bus service slash and burn in East and West Sussex?
    Well, The 96 runs once a day in each direction as it's a school run. I believe they were looking at the 74 which also runs once. That is a duplicate route with the 75, one goes through Coldean and the other is fast to Patcham High School from Coldean Lane. As far as a replacement for the 96 goes, maybe Roger will divert a 5 via Westdene, (a 5C perhaps?).

    It is the only bus which goes through Tongdean Lane bridge, which usually results in a few interesting facial expressions from oncoming motorists who don't expect to see a double decker coming towards them on that particular road, nor do they expect it to fit through the bridge.
    I would just like to make clear that although the 74 may follow a duplicate route to the 75, both buses are always jammed pack with standing room only. And before people start commenting kids should go to their local school, Patcham is the catchment school for Coldean. The alternative is two buses with a very lengthy wait for the unreliable 24 service. If BHCC and Brighton Buses insist on cutting this service maybe they could consider insisting that the 5B makes a loop into Coldean, which would bring in a great deal of revenue as there is no other service linking Coldean with Patcham, and would be far more beneficial than a queue of 5B's waiting outside Asda which happens currently.
    The 5B already does when it leaves the University, it goes round Coldean, then loops round to the regular 5B stop at Hollingbury. Half hourly at peak hours."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

Brighton and Hove Council move to scrap 12 bus routes despite opposition

School pupils join protesters and opposition councillors outside Hove Town Hall in a bid to save threatened bus routes Buy this photo » School pupils join protesters and opposition councillors outside Hove Town Hall in a bid to save threatened bus routes

Buses serving hospitals, schools and suburban areas will be scrapped – despite fierce opposition.

Dozens of campaigners protested outside Hove Town Hall today (June 14) against the plans by Brighton and Hove City Council to end about 12 subsidised routes from September.

The Green-controlled local authority believes it can save about £230,000 a year as it looks to combat Government-imposed cuts.

It added a further 17 non-profit making routes costing £900,000 a year would continue for the next four years.

But critics said it would stop the elderly and teenagers from leaving their homes, adding it would increase car traffic.

Among the protesters presenting a series of petitions with hundreds of signatures were school children from Hove Park School.

They use the 96 service from the Westdene area of Brighton every day.

However the local authority said it could not afford the £38,000 subsidy to run it.

The Green administration did say it would work with parents, schools and providers to find alternatives to transport youngsters every day.

'Cannot continue'

Council leader Jason Kitcat said: "We are fortunate that in our city 98% of routes do not require a subsidy but school routes are particularly challenging to run without subsidy.

"We cannot continue to carry the costs of running some of the school bus routes on their historical basis."

Jayne Bennett and Vanessa Brown, who represent Hove Park, said they had collected about 160 individual letters from residents about the ending of the 81 service on Monday to Saturday evenings.

Coun Bennett said: "Many people, particularly the elderly, are totally dependent on this service. They will be prisoners in their homes."

Gemma Alexander, 23, of Ainsworth Avenue, Ovingdean, collected more than 300 signatures in a day and a half against the ending of the 52 which connects the area with the city centre.

She added: "I've been knocking on doors and a number of people didn't know about it. They hardly gave us any notice."

The council said it was not able to make public the affected routes any earlier due to the "competitive bidding process".

Opposition suggestions

The Conservative group proposed the local authority find funding to keep the 27, 22, 52 and 81 services.

It also suggested looking again at the 96 and that they postpone any change until September 2013 at the earliest.

The Labour group suggested funding for all of the affected routes was found from the Green’s commitment to the One Planet Living project aimed at reducing people’s carbon footprint.

Both of these were voted down by Green councillors who have the casting vote on the influential policy and resources committee yesterday.

What do you think about the cuts? Tell us by writing to our letters page, email letters@theargus.co.uk or leave a comment below.

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree