Jobs axe looms over East Sussex firefighters

Firefighters' jobs are on the line as a service struggles to balance the books.

East Sussex Fire and Rescue Service has announced that it has “no option” but to cut the number of posts to try to make £1.9 million of savings in the next four years.

However a spokesman said it would not know how many firefighters would lose their jobs until July.

The Fire Brigades Union has warned that further redundancies would put lives at risk.

About 20 jobs are expected to go when East and West Sussex’s fire services merge control rooms next September.

But the fire service has now warned that further posts would have to be cut by March 2013, although it hopes to avoid compulsory redundancies.

Des Prichard, chief fire officer and chief executive for East Sussex Fire and Rescue Service (ESFRS), said: “ESFRS has been undertaking a review of all its services over the last three years to help towards meeting progressive reductions in Government grant and recent council tax freezes.

“The prudent planning of the fire authority in recent years has helped mitigate some of the impact of the grant reductions. However, the fire authority has to deliver a balanced budget every year.

“At its meeting on June 7, East Sussex Fire Authority considered its future budget planning and reluctantly agreed that, despite making savings in a number of areas, it was now left with no option other than to reduce a number of posts by March 31, 2013, to fulfil the savings required.

“ESFRS will do all it can to support staff directly affected by any changes and the aim is to keep redundancies to an absolute minimum. Wherever possible, the authority will seek the reduction in posts through natural turnover, redeployment and retirement.”

Mark Brown, secretary of East Sussex Fire Brigades Union, said: “The FBU are wholly opposed to any cuts in establishment within East Sussex. Frontline posts have already been reduced due to cuts within East Sussex. Any further cuts to the already reduced establishment will put public lives at risk.

“Not only will any cuts to frontline services put the public at greater risk, it will also increase the risk to firefighters.”

Mr Pritchard insisted there would be “no drop in standards and safety will not be compromised, either for the public or for our firefighters”.

Comments(10)

The Wolfie says...
5:35pm Fri 15 Jun 12

Well never mind they can all concentrate on their part time full time jobs the lovely shift system allows them to have.

D360 says...
6:45pm Fri 15 Jun 12

We are already feeling the impact of the damaging cuts to the Police service, Education, Ambulance service and wider NHS. Perhaps now is the time to ask whether it is acceptable to pay firefighters to sleep on night shifts and whether it makes financial sense to send multiple fire engines to smoke alarms?

The Wolfie says...
9:01pm Fri 15 Jun 12

Or just stick to fighting fires and let the other emergency services do what they train for...

AmboGuy says...
1:24pm Sat 16 Jun 12

The Wolfie wrote:
Well never mind they can all concentrate on their part time full time jobs the lovely shift system allows them to have.
Maybe you've forgotten about the two fire fighters who lost their lives a few years ago.

Have you ever risked your life for your job?

The Gnome says...
3:44pm Sat 16 Jun 12

And yet the bankers who created this mess (and I mean the chiefs, not the office workers) get to keep their posts or recieve eyewateringly large pay-offs before being neatly moved into another corporation. Google, Vodafone and the like get to avoid massive tax liabilities for no reason other that "it would be a bit complicated to go after them". The banks have just been given more (our) money and surprise... their shareholders see an increase in their portfolio values instantly. Still, I'm sure those lazy, inefficient public sector workers who only care for people, educate the next generation and save lives can take comfort in the fact that the wealth will filter down - they should be grateful really...

mimseycal says...
4:00pm Sat 16 Jun 12

It seems some people won't be content till we are back relying on a voluntary Fire Service - much as we now rely on the RNLI.

ourcoalition says...
12:56pm Sun 17 Jun 12

Yes - we should all be grateful, to "be in it together".
Last years average (yes, average) pay rise for the bosses - a mere 50%, but this year a ruinous 10%.
For us, an effective pay cut.....

Is this the politics of envy - absolutely. I am livid (and green all over)!!!

The Wolfie says...
9:35pm Sun 17 Jun 12

AmboGuy wrote:
The Wolfie wrote:
Well never mind they can all concentrate on their part time full time jobs the lovely shift system allows them to have.
Maybe you've forgotten about the two fire fighters who lost their lives a few years ago.

Have you ever risked your life for your job?
Yep, for many years thanks. Never for the wages, conditions and leave fire fighters get though.

mr busy says...
5:56pm Tue 19 Jun 12

Wolfie, I think we may be missing the point here. Less operational staff means less operational staff, simple. This cannot equate to anything else than a reduction in services. It's not about the perks you believe firefighters may get its about public safety.
Police are also suffering losses.

Incidentally Wolfie what is your dangerous but underpaid job? How does it compare to a firefighters?

mr busy says...
6:24pm Tue 19 Jun 12

Additionally I imagine there are also a number of support staff behind the scenes who ensure the firefighters can do their job effectively and help make the public safer. It's not just about firefighters its about public safety.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree