Public to have their say on hospital changes

Thousands of people are today being given the chance to have their say about plans to change their hospitals.

A public consultation on plans to shake-up some services in East Sussex will run for 14 weeks.

Health bosses currently run stroke care, emergency orthopaedic and emergency surgery at both Eastbourne District General Hospital and Conquest Hospital in St Leonards.

They are now considering centralising these services at one of the two hospitals instead.

East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, which runs both hospitals, says the changes will help it attract the specialist staff it needs to run the services.

Specialists need to see a certain number of cases a year to keep their skill levels up and are more likely to transfer to hospitals that can guarantee a high number of patients.

Managers say that having almost all patients at one hospital instead of two will help this happen and will also cut down on the number of operations cancelled at the last minute because of staff shortages.

However campaigners say lives will be put at risk because the changes will mean hundreds of patients a year will have to travel at least 20 miles or more for urgent treatment.

They warned the fight to keep full maternity services at both hospitals five years ago was successful and that they were prepared to fight again.

Trust medical director Andy Slater said: “Staff at both Eastbourne DGH and Conquest Hospital work incredibly hard to provide excellent care. This is about improving our services so we can do even better.”

The Eastbourne, Hailsham and Seaford clinical commissioning group is responsible for ensuring the right services are provided in the right place.

Chairman and Eastbourne GP Martin Writer said: “Like everyone in East Sussex, we want Eastbourne DGH and Conquest Hospital to remain thriving major sites.

“These proposals are not a threat to that ambition they are a means of achieving it.

“They are about raising the standard of care in three specialist areas.

“On occasions some patients will need to travel further for some specialist services but these changes will guarantee the right specialist teams are in place, at the right time, with dedicated facilities for recovery before going home.”

The consultation end at midnight on Friday September 28.

During this time there will be a range of opportunities, including public meetings, for people to hear about the proposal, talk to the clinical teams involved and to give their views.

Full details can be found at www.esht.nhs.uk/shapingour future.

Paper copies of the consultation are available by calling the Shaping our Future consultation team on 01273 485300.

Comments(7)

Ligand Fields says...
9:54am Mon 25 Jun 12

Sounds like the hospital "bosses" are proposing a sensible idea (better expertise, less cancellations) and the "campaigners" should focus on lobbying to improve Sussex's sometimes-rather-rub
bish transport infrastructure rather than opposing the plans. If we can deliver advanced medical care in this country, we ought to be able to manage to run a bloody bus service too.

rs says...
11:33am Mon 25 Jun 12

Ligand Fields wrote:
Sounds like the hospital "bosses" are proposing a sensible idea (better expertise, less cancellations) and the "campaigners" should focus on lobbying to improve Sussex's sometimes-rather-rub

bish transport infrastructure rather than opposing the plans. If we can deliver advanced medical care in this country, we ought to be able to manage to run a bloody bus service too.
how can critically ill patients travelling having to travel 25 minutes further in an ambulance be a "sensible idea"?

Ligand Fields says...
11:52am Mon 25 Jun 12

rs wrote:
Ligand Fields wrote: Sounds like the hospital "bosses" are proposing a sensible idea (better expertise, less cancellations) and the "campaigners" should focus on lobbying to improve Sussex's sometimes-rather-rub bish transport infrastructure rather than opposing the plans. If we can deliver advanced medical care in this country, we ought to be able to manage to run a bloody bus service too.
how can critically ill patients travelling having to travel 25 minutes further in an ambulance be a "sensible idea"?
For the reasons given in the article by the Trust, which you can read by moving your eyes across the words and joining them up into sentences.

Josie301 says...
7:19pm Mon 25 Jun 12

I understand what they are saying about the specialist treatment etc...BUT, for people to travel such a long way, is not helping the patient.
Eastbourne in my opinion for me is a very long way...I attend the Conquest many times, I have much wrong with me...when I attended Hurstwood Park, this was hard, I had a transphenoidal op...but gradually, they asked the Conquest if they could monitor me as it was too far for me to travel. I have TIAs, I have cerobrovascular disease in the brain...I had an emergency visit to A & E recently after speaking with NHS Direct, I felt I was having another stroke, it was so hard just travelling to the Conquest, let alone Eastbourne...I could hardly breath...I was monitored through the night...came home, but was really bad for the next week...NO...I say, keep the depts as is now...

rs says...
10:26pm Mon 25 Jun 12

Ligand Fields wrote:
rs wrote:
Ligand Fields wrote: Sounds like the hospital "bosses" are proposing a sensible idea (better expertise, less cancellations) and the "campaigners" should focus on lobbying to improve Sussex's sometimes-rather-rub bish transport infrastructure rather than opposing the plans. If we can deliver advanced medical care in this country, we ought to be able to manage to run a bloody bus service too.
how can critically ill patients travelling having to travel 25 minutes further in an ambulance be a "sensible idea"?
For the reasons given in the article by the Trust, which you can read by moving your eyes across the words and joining them up into sentences.
and it's clear you're unable to read between the lines. Emergency surgery and stroke care are time critical, it doesn't matter how good the treatment is, if its too late when they arrive.

rs says...
10:29pm Mon 25 Jun 12

Ligand Fields wrote:
rs wrote:
Ligand Fields wrote: Sounds like the hospital "bosses" are proposing a sensible idea (better expertise, less cancellations) and the "campaigners" should focus on lobbying to improve Sussex's sometimes-rather-rub bish transport infrastructure rather than opposing the plans. If we can deliver advanced medical care in this country, we ought to be able to manage to run a bloody bus service too.
how can critically ill patients travelling having to travel 25 minutes further in an ambulance be a "sensible idea"?
For the reasons given in the article by the Trust, which you can read by moving your eyes across the words and joining them up into sentences.
Also 63 consultants at EDGH have criticised the plans in a leaked letter.

hippyhippyshake says...
9:23pm Tue 26 Jun 12

Emergency surgery is not always "time critical", more "location critical", there's no point being at the wrong hospital quickly.....new trauma guidelines suggest that, for serious cases it's better to travel 45 mins to a trauma hospital than stop off at a DGH. but hey what do I know I only do it for a Job...

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree