What price the elected leader of your council?

The stark differences in Sussex council leaders’ allowances can be revealed today following an investigation by The Argus.

Council leaders get as much as £40,000 a year with one paid three times the amount of his counter- part at a similar sized council.

As well as receiving a basic allowance – along with every other councillor – leaders are given a special responsibility allowance (SRA) for their added commitments.

Leaders of the bigger councils traditionally receive greater amounts due to their increased responsibilities and duties.

For example, Peter Jones, the leader of East Sussex County Council, which serves 515,500 people, gets £34,929 a year.

In comparison, Neil Parkin, the leader of Adur District Council serving 60,600, gets £8,175 a year.

A fairer comparison is achieved by dividing the total each council- lor gets in allowances by the number of people the council serves.

At £18.93 per 100 constituents, Mid Sussex District Council leader Garry Wall receives one of the highest rates of allowances.

Along with a basic allowance of £4,501, Coun Wall gets £20,590 SRA for serving the district’s 132,500 population.

He told The Argus that the amount justified what was in effect a full-time job and added that if other council leaders were receiving less than him then it was up to them to ask for more.

Crawley Borough Council leader Bob Lanzer receives £18.80 per 100 constituents with a £5,949 basic and £14,281 SRA.

This compares to the £6,630 received by the Eastbourne Borough Council leader, David Tutt.

His allowance for serving the town’s 97,000 population equates to just £6.80 per 100 people.

Brighton and Hove City Council leader Jason Kitcat receives the second highest single lump sum amount at £40,221 – £15.54 per 100 of the authority’s population.

Coun Kitcat said: “This is all I do. I don’t have another job to go to and I think the amount is justified for running a city.”

Louise Goldsmith, leader of West Sussex County Council, who gets the highest annual amount at £41,774, added: “I really work very hard, often between 60 to 80 hours a week. Anyone can spend a few days with me and see how hard I work.”

Councillors are unsalaried but receive allowances as a modest payment in return for their attendance at meetings and events.

Neil Parkin, the leader of Adur District Council, said that the varying rates were a problem. He said: “It is like a full-time job and there is a great deal of responsibility but there is no reason why there should be such huge differences in allowances.”

What do you think? Write to the letters editor or letters@the argus.co.uk.

CRAWLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL Basic: £5,949 SRA: £14,281 Total: £20,230 Population: 107,600 Allowance per 100 people: £18.80

EASTBOURNE BOROUGH COUNCIL Basic: £2,652 SRA: £3,978 Total: £6,630 Population: 97,000 Allowance per 100 people: £6.80

CHICHESTER DISTRICT COUNCIL Basic: £4,300 SRA: £13,250 Total: £17,550 Population: 113,500 Allowance per 100 people: £15.46

LEWES DISTRICT COUNCIL Basic: £2,975 SRA: £13,799 Total: £16,774 Population: 97,500 Allowance per 100 people: £17.20

HORSHAM DISTRICT COUNCIL Basic: £4,665 SRA: £12,376 Total: £17,041 Population: 130,800 Allowance per 100 people: £13.02

ADUR DISTRICT COUNCIL Basic: £3,270 SRA: £4,905 Total: £8,175 Population: 60,600 Allowance per 100 people: £13.60

WORTHING BOROUGH COUNCIL Basic: £3,897 SRA: £7,467 Total: £11,364 Population: 103, 200 Allowance per 100 people: £11.01

WEALDEN DISTRICT COUNCIL Basic: £4,215 SRA: £12,330 Total: £16,545 Population: 144,100 Allowance per 100 people: £11.48

MID SUSSEX DISTRICT COUNCIL Basic: £4,501 SRA: £20,590 Total: £25,091 Population: 132,500 Allowance per 100 people: £18.93

WEST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL Basic: £11,030 SRA: £30,744 Total: £41,774 Population: 799,700 Allowance per 100 people: £5.20

ROTHER DISTRICT COUNCIL Basic: £4,237 SRA: £12,376 Total: £16,613 Population: 89,900 Allowance per 100 people: £18.47

BRIGHTON AND HOVE CITY COUNCIL Basic: £11,463 SRA: £28,758 Total: £40,221 Population: 258,800 Allowance per 100 people: £15.54

ARUN DISTRICT COUNCIL Basic: £4,870 SRA: £14,196 Total: £19,066 Population: 150,600 Allowance per 100 people: £12.66

EAST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL Basic: £10,842 SRA: £24,087 Total: £34,929 Population: 515,500 Allowance per 100 people: £6

HASTINGS BOROUGH COUNCIL Basic: £5,559 SRA: £11,118 Total: £16,677 Population: 87,200 Allowance per 100 people: £19.12

Comments(14)

clearbluesky says...
3:15pm Fri 29 Jun 12

At the risk of becoming one of the 'angry people' who occupy The Argus message boards I have to remark that 40k for Kitkat to run Brighton would be justified if only he had a modicum of nouce or business experience.

Ligand Fields says...
3:58pm Fri 29 Jun 12

I'm amused to think that Jason 'Take a break, take a...' Kitcat believes himself to be "running" the city. Jim Hacker used to think he was there run the Dept. of Administrative Affairs too.
We all know that, in reality, everything is in the grip of the truculent bisms of the GMB and their special contractors.

HJarrs says...
4:27pm Fri 29 Jun 12

Can't see what the big deal is other than some council allowances are not high enough for what is in every case a demanding and responsible job.

I suppose that some moaners think that if everything is done on purely a voluntary basis that representation will improve.

fredflintstone1 says...
5:15pm Fri 29 Jun 12

If Cllr Kitcat doesn't have anything else to do, and thinks £40k is ok for running the city, why has he been happy to see the city stump up £160k+ for a CEO? Can he assure us that Barradell's successor will be offered no more than £40k? If not, why not?

fredflintstone1 says...
5:32pm Fri 29 Jun 12

HJarrs wrote:
Can't see what the big deal is other than some council allowances are not high enough for what is in every case a demanding and responsible job.

I suppose that some moaners think that if everything is done on purely a voluntary basis that representation will improve.
In case you hadn't noticed, the city is being very badly run. Not everything is about paying more money - look at the bankers! Things need to change. What talent does Kitcat have? There's no interview process for a council leader (of whatever colour). You just end up with who you get .... a person who - rightly or wrongly - thinks they can do the job. It would be more cost-effective to join up with East Sussex again.

wole says...
6:48am Sat 30 Jun 12

I hope Kitkat fails miserably in his post of council leader. How on earth can a 34 year old with no experience can be in charge of Brighton and Hove's budget is beyond me.
Brighton is not city and as for him to say that he is running it is just a complete lie! This idiot could not run a bath let alone a town like this.
I pay all of my taxes but the only one I begrudge is the council tax.
Pure fraud of a man on par with David Bellotti and I hope he gets found out just like Bellotti did.

mimseycal says...
9:22am Sat 30 Jun 12

The allowances paid to the various individuals is really neither here nor there.
The real issue really should be how effective these various individuals are. Are they really acting with the best interest of the populace as a whole being in the forefront of their aims or are they ideologically driven?
If it is an ideology that drives them, let the ideology pay them!

fredaj says...
11:43am Sat 30 Jun 12

Isaac Rinkfern wrote:
According to the figures on the Adur council website, the £8,175 is Neil Parkin's SRA, on top of this he receives other allowances, making the true total £11,642.45 (for 11/12). This works out at £19.21 per 100 constituents, and not the £13.60 that you quote. Looks like someone's been fibbing about their allowances to your reporter.
Looks like Parkin actually takes the top spot in your survey, unless of course some of the others have fibbed.
The article does not suggest or imply that The Argus has obtained this information by directly asking these people what allowances they have received.

Isaac Rinkfern says...
1:02pm Sat 30 Jun 12

By the clear indication that they have these figures, they must have received the information from either the local authorities concerned or the individuals themselves. Either way the truth has been misrepresented, the misrepresentation of fact is a fib. The individuals concerned have had the oportunity to correct these figures but Mr Parkin has chosen not to.

HJarrs says...
1:28pm Sat 30 Jun 12

fredflintstone1 wrote:
HJarrs wrote:
Can't see what the big deal is other than some council allowances are not high enough for what is in every case a demanding and responsible job.

I suppose that some moaners think that if everything is done on purely a voluntary basis that representation will improve.
In case you hadn't noticed, the city is being very badly run. Not everything is about paying more money - look at the bankers! Things need to change. What talent does Kitcat have? There's no interview process for a council leader (of whatever colour). You just end up with who you get .... a person who - rightly or wrongly - thinks they can do the job. It would be more cost-effective to join up with East Sussex again.
I am afraid that I haven't noticed that the city is being run very badly. It does not seem to be being run any worse than under any other administration whilst I have lived in the City. Rather this seems to be a politiaclly motivated view constantly reinforced by the usual posters.

I am sure that East Sussex would not look forward to a political takeover by B&H, which is what it would likely be. It would be far more sensible to merge Ardur with B&H to form one council as it is one contiguous connerbation. I am sure many in Ardur would disagree under the present council structure.

Jakob1 says...
11:07pm Tue 3 Jul 12

Isaak. you seem to have a massive chip on your shoulder? Why not stand in the local elections?

Inferring someone is lying is likely to drop you in very hot water and I'm surprised allegations like that are not moderated.

With free speech comes responsibility, so where's yours

Isaac Rinkfern says...
9:50am Wed 4 Jul 12

Jakob1 wrote:
Isaak. you seem to have a massive chip on your shoulder? Why not stand in the local elections?

Inferring someone is lying is likely to drop you in very hot water and I'm surprised allegations like that are not moderated.

With free speech comes responsibility, so where's yours
No chips on my shoulders, they fell off when I was knocked to the floor and punched by the local council, (ooh is this metaphorical or a physical fact, I cannot confirm or deny that).
Inferrence is not an allegation, however I stand firm that I have not fibbed.
Adur council are a vile organisation why on earth would I want to become part of that?
I have a responsibility to the truth and justice, free speech does bring responsibility, so does power, abuse of the latter is far worse that making a few jibes at potentially corrupt officials, and yes I can only say potentially because of the libel laws, I would love to be able to leave that word out and can prove my allegations, unlike ADC who hide behind their power to potentially cover up possible breaches of UK law.
I could show you documents and play you recordings of ADC staff that would make your toes curl, but sadly free speech doesn't beat council legal teams.

Isaac Rinkfern says...
1:14pm Wed 4 Jul 12

Just as an aside, Adur have just announced that they are letting the councillors decide if they should all receive a 10% increase in basic allowance.
Even funnier than that, Mr Parkin looks set to receive a 66.666% increase in his leader's SRA, what an appropriate number eh?
Again they kept this quiet when the reporter quoted the figures, didn't they........

Isaac Rinkfern says...
11:54pm Wed 4 Jul 12

Under the proposed increases, Parkin will be receiving £16,200, that comes out at £26.73 per 100 constituents.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree