West Sussex County Council saves £9.7m

Civic leaders claim they are “well on target” to find nearly £80 million of savings over three years – despite thousands of vulnerable people having their care criteria changed.

As Government cuts worsen, West Sussex County Council has reported an underspend of £9.7 million in the last financial year.

Its annual accounts for 2011/12 also show it has £176 million in reserves – an increase of £61 million from its February forecast.

Despite thousands of people appealing to council bosses to reduce the cuts to care services for the disabled and most vulnerable, the local authority has said it will stick with its policy of saving to fund its long-term commitments.

Yet campaigners have urged the local authority to think again and help those who have no voice.

Barry Pickthall, of campaign group Don’t Cut Us Out, said: “That they have taken £31 million out of adult social care and put millions in reserves just shows they’re living in a different world.

“That is money they have taken out of the pocket of the taxpayer and it is sitting doing nothing. It’s so frustrating.”

Of the underspend, £4.5 million has been transferred to the infrastructure fund, to pay for improvements, such as superfast broadband across the county.

A further £4.7 million will be reallocated to budgets for the 2012/13 financial year.

Michael Brown, the council’s finance cabinet member, said: “The future is very uncertain, and we would be living in a fool’s paradise if we were to think that Government grants are suddenly going to increase again.

“Once you have excluded all the committed money in the reserves fund, we have just £18 million available in the general fund, which may sound like a large amount but, in practice, would in fact only cover the costs of running the entire county council for just 13 days.

“I know some people have asked why we don’t simply spend our reserves maintaining services, but once that money is spent it is gone, and the service is either suddenly cut or we have to seek more money from the taxpayer.”

Comments(5)

sbiscorrupt says...
5:39pm Tue 10 Jul 12

It's the standard 'business model' being rolled out all over the country...

Asset strip everyone, starting with the most vulnerable...

HJarrs says...
8:33pm Tue 10 Jul 12

Very few comments on this by the anti-Green brigade despite cuts in West Sussex being far more severe.

These cuts make those taking place in B&H look miniscule.

mimseycal says...
9:01pm Tue 10 Jul 12

Have you also considered that the area West Sussex County Council covers is rather larger than the one that the Brighton & Hove Green demolition team is trying to force into an ideological straitjacket.

Maybe not but then again, WSCC isn't Green led is it ;)

BTW wasn't it a Green Party member who objecting to traffic schemes called them, and I quote "... a disgrace at a time when council services to the elderly and disadvantaged are being cut and jobs lost, ..." John Tyler wasn't it, after an announcement that 1 million had been spent so far on the A24 scheme.

How much has the Green Party in Brighton & Hove spent on cycle lanes?

HJarrs says...
9:51pm Tue 10 Jul 12

mimseycal wrote:
Have you also considered that the area West Sussex County Council covers is rather larger than the one that the Brighton & Hove Green demolition team is trying to force into an ideological straitjacket. Maybe not but then again, WSCC isn't Green led is it ;) BTW wasn't it a Green Party member who objecting to traffic schemes called them, and I quote "... a disgrace at a time when council services to the elderly and disadvantaged are being cut and jobs lost, ..." John Tyler wasn't it, after an announcement that 1 million had been spent so far on the A24 scheme. How much has the Green Party in Brighton & Hove spent on cycle lanes?
Size is not the issue it is what you do with that counts.

WSCC is facing far more savage cuts than B&H without even building a few cycle lanes, yet people like you are incredibly quiet on this as it is inconvenient.

B&H have been pretty good at levering in investment for projects considering the state of the nation. As far as I understand the proposed Lewes Rd corridor works, the council has levered in £9 for every £1 of council money spent. You don't get modal shift by just talking about it!

mimseycal says...
10:06pm Tue 10 Jul 12

Pretty good? Ah yes, one of the investments depended on them taking out a £14.8 million loan didn't it?

The fact remains though that our Green council is spending on road improvement schemes whilst cutting services to the elderly and disadvantaged. Which was exactly what the Green John Tyler objected to.

And please do not use such terms as 'people like you' dear. It tends to put your post in a very defensive light and I am sure that isn't your intention at all ;)

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree