Royal Pavilion team face jobs axe (From The Argus)
Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
Royal Pavilion team face jobs axe
7:59am Tuesday 4th September 2012 in News By Tim Ridgway, Local government reporter
Staff protecting one of the country’s most famous buildings could face the axe as part of cost-cutting measures.
More than 30 staff are currently employed by Brighton and Hove City Council to secure the Royal Pavilion and its other museums.
However, as the local authority looks to make savings, The Argus understands there are plans to make some staff redundant and reduce the rest of the workers’ salaries by £1,000 each a year.
This is despite them being among the lowest paid staff on the council’s books.
It comes a few days after The Argus revealed the local authority was spending about £30,000 on recruiting a new chief executive.
The exact details are yet to be drawn up as discussions take place between council chiefs and union representatives.
However, The Argus understands the current plan will involve three members of staff leaving their £18,000-a-year roles and reducing the salaries of others.
It is believed this will save the local authority £98,000 a year and is part of the 120 posts the council said it would scrap in the current financial year.
It is not clear if this would be at odds with the local authority’s decision last year to give its lowest paid workers a living wage of £7.19 an hour.
Mark Turner, of the GMB union, said: “I do not understand why the council is spending money recruiting a chief executive when there are perfectly good people in the council to do this.
“Then, at the same time they are proposing to cut low paid staff and make people redundant – it’s despicable.
“The economic situation is what it is. But the local authority always looks to the same areas. These are frontline staff who are the face of the city and speak to visitors to the city from across the world every day.”
A council spokeswoman said: “The council and GMB are currently at a very early consultation stage. Information will be provided at the appropriate time.”
A town hall report produced in July said the local authority’s Royal Pavilion and Museums team forecast an overspend for the current financial year of £100,000.
It added this is “due mainly to security costs of £40,000”.
At the time the local authority said it did not want to comment due to sensitivities with the building.
Most of the burglaries at the Royal Pavilion, which was built for the Prince Regent in stages between 1787 and 1823, have taken place during the day.
In August 2007, The Argus revealed the estate had four exhibits worth tens of thousands of pounds stolen in two raids over the summer.
This happened when the local authority squeezed its information and security team staff down by eight to 28.
Among the other buildings they secure are Brighton Museum and Preston Manor.
What do you think of the plans? Tell us by writing to our letters page, emailing letters@theargus.co.uk or leaving a comment below.
Comments(15)
Morpheus
says...
9:40am Tue 4 Sep 12
Enema of the peephole
says...
9:41am Tue 4 Sep 12
For all of the many such future stories about job losses perhaps the Argus could include in the headline "-still, at least the Olympics was nice"?
True cost of the olympicd appears to be more like £22 billion. The NHS has to save £20 billion by 2015. It is reaching breaking point at just £5 billion. The NHS will be essentially gone long before the £20 billion cuts are complete and siphoning off money to keep dysfunctional private providers in profit will continue.
The Olympic "legacy" was debt and stories like the above.
rolivan
says...
10:00am Tue 4 Sep 12
inadaptado
says...
10:12am Tue 4 Sep 12
inadaptado
says...
10:15am Tue 4 Sep 12
rolivan wrote:That is because besides shopping, dining or clubbing there is not much to do here other than visiting those two spots.
If you ask anyone around the World about Brighton They will tell you about their visit to the Pavilion and the Pier(s).
And let's be honest, the Pavilion is not the Eiffel Tower. Ask someone who has not visited Brighton and they will probably have no idea what you are talking about.
fascinator
says...
10:22am Tue 4 Sep 12
Morpheus wrote:Which Labour council was that then?
I took a visitor round the Pavilion last week and was telling him that a Labour council wanted to knock it down, now we have a Green council that seems happy to have it vandlised.
rolivan
says...
10:36am Tue 4 Sep 12
inadaptado wrote:You missed out squatting and sitting in doorways begging.
rolivan wrote:That is because besides shopping, dining or clubbing there is not much to do here other than visiting those two spots.
If you ask anyone around the World about Brighton They will tell you about their visit to the Pavilion and the Pier(s).
And let's be honest, the Pavilion is not the Eiffel Tower. Ask someone who has not visited Brighton and they will probably have no idea what you are talking about.
bluemonday
says...
10:51am Tue 4 Sep 12
rolivan wrote:some of you people are just never happy are you,i've recently moved to this area and think brighton is a buzzing city,not perfect and has it's problems like everywhere,try spending some time in the midlands and you'll see what a dump is.
inadaptado wrote:You missed out squatting and sitting in doorways begging.rolivan wrote: If you ask anyone around the World about Brighton They will tell you about their visit to the Pavilion and the Pier(s).That is because besides shopping, dining or clubbing there is not much to do here other than visiting those two spots. And let's be honest, the Pavilion is not the Eiffel Tower. Ask someone who has not visited Brighton and they will probably have no idea what you are talking about.
Enema of the peephole
says...
10:52am Tue 4 Sep 12
The library is superb.
I heard a burglar left a crow bar in Brighton Museum - which has doubled the total cost of the exhibits.
In future, positive-minded people trying to forget about having inoperable cancer will be the only ones to claim the i360 was "ok".
alanjones666
says...
10:56am Tue 4 Sep 12
Morpheus wrote:You need to check your facts.
I took a visitor round the Pavilion last week and was telling him that a Labour council wanted to knock it down, now we have a Green council that seems happy to have it vandlised.
" The Royal Pavilion was unpopular with Queen Victoria, whose reign began in 1837. Her last visit was in 1845; soon afterwards the Government wanted to demolish the building and sell the land to pay for building work at Buckingham Palace. This proposal was unpopular in the town, and in May 1850 the Town Commissioners received consent to buy the 9-acre (3.6 ha) site, including the chapel. It became the property of Brighton Corporation (the forerunners of the present-day Council) in 1855."
HJarrs
says...
11:10am Tue 4 Sep 12
fascinator wrote:That would be the Labour Council in their dreams! That is a complete fabrication (and I am no Labour supporter).
Morpheus wrote: I took a visitor round the Pavilion last week and was telling him that a Labour council wanted to knock it down, now we have a Green council that seems happy to have it vandlised.Which Labour council was that then?
However, it was a combination of Labour and Conservative councillors that voted down a small rise in council tax this year that would have provided the council with several million pounds of addtional revenue and would have saved many jobs.
inadaptado
says...
12:12pm Tue 4 Sep 12
bluemonday wrote:For what is worth, I really do like it here, warts and all. I just don't want to kid myself: Brighton is not Paris, people came here for leisure not culture.
rolivan wrote:some of you people are just never happy are you,i've recently moved to this area and think brighton is a buzzing city,not perfect and has it's problems like everywhere,try spending some time in the midlands and you'll see what a dump is.
inadaptado wrote:You missed out squatting and sitting in doorways begging.rolivan wrote: If you ask anyone around the World about Brighton They will tell you about their visit to the Pavilion and the Pier(s).That is because besides shopping, dining or clubbing there is not much to do here other than visiting those two spots. And let's be honest, the Pavilion is not the Eiffel Tower. Ask someone who has not visited Brighton and they will probably have no idea what you are talking about.
BEVIE33
says...
12:24pm Tue 4 Sep 12
chrisinbrighton
says...
12:28pm Tue 4 Sep 12
Phani Tikkala says...
9:38am Tue 4 Sep 12