Sussex councils consider business merger (From The Argus)
Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
Sussex councils consider business merger
6:50pm Thursday 6th September 2012 in News By Tim Ridgway, Local government reporter
Taxpayers could profit from tens of millions of pounds as town hall bosses consider merging part of their services into a business.
SE7 was formed in 2010 as an informal partnership between the seven largest councils in the region as a way to share services and make tens of millions of pounds of savings.
However, Peter Jones , leader of East Sussex County Council, has revealed there are plans to turn it into a formal trading company, which could be done as early as next year.
Coun Jones believes creating a business to oversee some of the council’s work, such as IT services, road repairs or waste collection, could make hundreds of millions of pounds of profit.
However others have questioned how accountable the “business” would be.
Coun Jones said: “We’re at the very early stage of considering it but what we’re beginning to think there are other ways we can benefit from this partnership.
“For instance looking at waste, we are thinking about ways to cut costs of about £150 million but also make a profit of £150 million.
“There are companies out there such as Capita and Serco which are making small fortunes doing outsourced contracts for local government bodies.
“I think there are some outstanding people in local government who in the right environment could do good for the general public.
“The last thing we want it to become is a quango.”
Millions saved
By 2014/15, it is predicted the seven local authorities, which includes West Sussex County and Brighton and Hove City councils, will have saved £74 million, with about £6 million for East Sussex County Council.
The same documents claim long-term savings of about £1.5 billion could be reached.
However, Carolyn Lambert, a Liberal Democrat councillor in East Sussex, said: “We call on the Conservatives to allow an open and transparent discussion of this issue with full council so that East Sussex ratepayers can decide whether or not this is an appropriate and cost effective way forward.”
A conference outlining the work SE7 is doing is planned in 2013 with Government ministers, Whitehall officials and other local authorities the target audience.
Brighton and Hove City Council leader Jason Kitcat said: “If we think about cooperative ownership I think any way we can work together, save money and perhaps make a profit which can stay in the public sector is certainly welcome.”
Becky Shaw, chief executive of East Sussex County Council, said: “The work of the SE7 continues to progress well and is fulfilling its remit to deliver service improvements and achieve savings.”
Comments(11)
bill porter
says...
8:10pm Thu 6 Sep 12
This will just end up replacing the quangos that have just been abolished.
HJarrs
says...
8:29pm Thu 6 Sep 12
If it becomes a limited company it will in time be bought up by Capita or Serco and then we will be taken to the cleaners.
george smith
says...
8:44pm Thu 6 Sep 12
John Steed
says...
10:14pm Thu 6 Sep 12
gusset snatcher
says...
11:29pm Thu 6 Sep 12
bruce_
says...
12:06pm Fri 7 Sep 12
Tailgaters Anonymous
says...
1:11pm Fri 7 Sep 12
getThisCoalitionOut
says...
2:10pm Fri 7 Sep 12
ourcoalition
says...
10:44pm Fri 7 Sep 12
F in L
says...
2:07pm Tue 11 Sep 12
So said Eric Pickles, when he was shadow communities secretary, 23 December 2008.
The councils might reasonably argue that they are nimble, modernized, business-like organisations, not flabby old bureaucracies. Even were this true..........., it would be no guarantee of success. The business sector's record on mergers is probably worse than the public sector's: by some estimates 80% of mergers end up crippling the companies involved and shredding shareholder value.
For technical and cultural reasons, local government restructuring is hugely complicated and problematic at the best of times, because each council will retain its democratic sovereignty. So a merger will have to accomodate different, and potentially changing political groupings, three different service specifications, and three different sets of local voters, each with different priorities and expectations.......
John Fallon says...
7:07pm Thu 6 Sep 12