Sussex councils consider business merger

Taxpayers could profit from tens of millions of pounds as town hall bosses consider merging part of their services into a business.

SE7 was formed in 2010 as an informal partnership between the seven largest councils in the region as a way to share services and make tens of millions of pounds of savings.

However, Peter Jones , leader of East Sussex County Council, has revealed there are plans to turn it into a formal trading company, which could be done as early as next year.

Coun Jones believes creating a business to oversee some of the council’s work, such as IT services, road repairs or waste collection, could make hundreds of millions of pounds of profit.

However others have questioned how accountable the “business” would be.

Coun Jones said: “We’re at the very early stage of considering it but what we’re beginning to think there are other ways we can benefit from this partnership.

“For instance looking at waste, we are thinking about ways to cut costs of about £150 million but also make a profit of £150 million.

“There are companies out there such as Capita and Serco which are making small fortunes doing outsourced contracts for local government bodies.

“I think there are some outstanding people in local government who in the right environment could do good for the general public.

“The last thing we want it to become is a quango.”

Millions saved

By 2014/15, it is predicted the seven local authorities, which includes West Sussex County and Brighton and Hove City councils, will have saved £74 million, with about £6 million for East Sussex County Council.

The same documents claim long-term savings of about £1.5 billion could be reached.

However, Carolyn Lambert, a Liberal Democrat councillor in East Sussex, said: “We call on the Conservatives to allow an open and transparent discussion of this issue with full council so that East Sussex ratepayers can decide whether or not this is an appropriate and cost effective way forward.”

A conference outlining the work SE7 is doing is planned in 2013 with Government ministers, Whitehall officials and other local authorities the target audience.

Brighton and Hove City Council leader Jason Kitcat said: “If we think about cooperative ownership I think any way we can work together, save money and perhaps make a profit which can stay in the public sector is certainly welcome.”

Becky Shaw, chief executive of East Sussex County Council, said: “The work of the SE7 continues to progress well and is fulfilling its remit to deliver service improvements and achieve savings.”

Comments(11)

John Fallon says...
7:07pm Thu 6 Sep 12

Excellent idea to join together but experience in other countries shows that unless they change working practices radically, it won't make anything like the savings predicted. And that means bringing in outsiders to show them how to do it. And if you do that, you might as well outsource the lot.

bill porter says...
8:10pm Thu 6 Sep 12

Although it has given a few useful ideas most of the so called initiatives the SE7 proposed just wasted loads of time and money as nobody there are too many contracts, systems and other differences that people couldn't or didn't want to resolve.

This will just end up replacing the quangos that have just been abolished.

HJarrs says...
8:29pm Thu 6 Sep 12

Typical Tories wanting to privatise everything for short term gain (maybe they hope to sit on the board?). This should be run as a mutual not for profit company. This gives the maximum long term benefit.

If it becomes a limited company it will in time be bought up by Capita or Serco and then we will be taken to the cleaners.

george smith says...
8:44pm Thu 6 Sep 12

However it will mean that the greens will be little fish in a big pond

John Steed says...
10:14pm Thu 6 Sep 12

excellent idea but i seem to recall that some years ago brighton council wanted to set up its own doubleglazing company so as to get quality windows at a realistic price for the refurbishment of council propertys but was not allowed to do so and had to put every thing out to tender

gusset snatcher says...
11:29pm Thu 6 Sep 12

It really needs business people to make these decisions. like mike holland said.... you could put forward any hair-brained money saving scheme and people like jason kitcat etc wouldn't have a clue... thats the trouble, it takes a few years of pain to find out and then some other clueless idiot appears on the political scene with another hair-brained scheme

bruce_ says...
12:06pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Capita and Serco? He's having a laugh, surely! Entrusting council works etc to the likes of them will cost us millions: to quote M Thatcher. No! No!! No!!!

Tailgaters Anonymous says...
1:11pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Gravy and train come to mind! When did any public sector initiative lead to the savings claimed?

getThisCoalitionOut says...
2:10pm Fri 7 Sep 12

If the council plans to make £150million profit I trust this is going to be ploughed back into the council so our council taxes are heavily reduced - NO - then forget it. I don't want profit going in anyone elses pockets thank you.

ourcoalition says...
10:44pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Anyone who wants to see how this works in practice should do a search for Bath and West Somerset - all fallen apart with a cost to the taxpayer of millions - and, by the way, that involved a load of Mike Holland lookalikes!

F in L says...
2:07pm Tue 11 Sep 12

"I'll have a pearl-handled revolver waiting in my drawer for the first civil servant who suggests another local government reorganisation."

So said Eric Pickles, when he was shadow communities secretary, 23 December 2008.

The councils might reasonably argue that they are nimble, modernized, business-like organisations, not flabby old bureaucracies. Even were this true..........., it would be no guarantee of success. The business sector's record on mergers is probably worse than the public sector's: by some estimates 80% of mergers end up crippling the companies involved and shredding shareholder value.

For technical and cultural reasons, local government restructuring is hugely complicated and problematic at the best of times, because each council will retain its democratic sovereignty. So a merger will have to accomodate different, and potentially changing political groupings, three different service specifications, and three different sets of local voters, each with different priorities and expectations.......

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree