Sussex schools install CCTV cameras in toilets (From The Argus)
Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
Sussex schools install CCTV cameras in toilets
8:16am Wednesday 12th September 2012 in News By Siobhan Ryan
Sussex schools install CCTV cameras in toilets
Schools in Sussex are installing CCTV cameras in changing rooms and toilets as a security measure.
The information was revealed in a report published today by the Big Brother Watch campaign group.
The group contacted schools around the country, asking them for details on the number of security cameras they had and where they were installed.
Specific details for individual schools were not revealed in the report.
However it found the Priory School in Lewes had four cameras in either changing rooms or toilet and washroom areas, while Hastings Academy and William Parker Sports College in Hastings had one apiece.
Longhill School in Rottingdean has a camera by a washroom area that covered the corridor outside.
Headteacher Haydn Stride said: “I do not have a problem with cameras in schools as they give pupils and staff a greater level of security. We have them located around the school and grounds.
“Their main aim is to keep an eye out for intruders and they are constantly monitored.”
The report also found that out of the responses it received, Brighton and Hove had more than 70 CCTV cameras installed at schools across the local authority area, which is higher than the national average.
Patcham High School also had a higher than average number of cameras, with an average of one camera for every 15 students.
A school spokeswoman said: “All of our cameras are situated in corridors or externally, not in toilets or changing rooms.”
Priory headteacher Tony Smith said: “The school has CCTV as a safety measure.
“The cameras record movement inside and outside of the school.
“The CCTV hasmade the site a safer environment.”
A spokesman for Brighton and Hove City Council said: “Decisions about security on school premises are a matter for individual schools.”
Big Brother Watch director Nick Pickles said: “The full extent of school surveillance is far higher than we had expected and will come as a shock to many parents.”
What do you think of the findings?
Tell us by writing to our letters page, emailing letters@theargus.co.uk or leaving a comment below.
Comments(11)
chrisinbrighton
says...
8:33am Wed 12 Sep 12
or is this a flying toilet ?
hovian
says...
9:27am Wed 12 Sep 12
If schools are serious about keeping intruders out - then maybe in the corridors at the most. Apparently there are more cameras in UK than anywhere else - what is wrong with this country when the only way to maintain law and order is by spying on everyone....?
ruberducker
says...
9:37am Wed 12 Sep 12
Morpheus
says...
9:47am Wed 12 Sep 12
matlock
says...
10:10am Wed 12 Sep 12
A well-installed CCTV system in a secondary school will pay for itself within 3 years in vandalism & theft prevention/recovery alone.
Crystal Ball
says...
10:56am Wed 12 Sep 12
pwlr1966
says...
11:35am Wed 12 Sep 12
matlock wrote:100% agree, school children are not the little angels their parents think they are.
The headline and content are deliberately misleading. Where cameras are installed near washrooms, they will be installed in such a way that they will view who goes in and out of an area only. This is to reduce vandalism, theft, bullying and truancy, and to provide reassurance. A well-installed CCTV system in a secondary school will pay for itself within 3 years in vandalism & theft prevention/recovery alone.
let us not forget the drug taking & smoking too. The school my children go to the students themselves voted for cameras either outside the toilets to see who goes in or out but also in toilet areas which have self contained cubicles. in each case there is no possibility of "watching" children do their buisness, just the ability to protect the tax payer from mindless acts
F in L
says...
4:11pm Wed 12 Sep 12
Things Kids Do Do
getThisCoalitionOut
says...
10:39pm Wed 12 Sep 12
Peter James
says...
7:38pm Thu 13 Sep 12
I am all for the transparency of information, but when it is misused, leading or incorrect and then not challenged, I feel the media will just jump on misinformation and shout loudly about it.
john5001 says...
8:31am Wed 12 Sep 12