Cuts take top Sussex detectives away from Brighton rape inquiry (From The Argus)
Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
Cuts take top Sussex Police detectives away from Brighton rape inquiry
4:00pm Wednesday 19th September 2012 in News By Ben Parsons, Crime Reporter
Sussex's top detectives are working on a Surrey case instead of investigating the unsolved gang rape of a teenager on Brighton seafront because of cuts.
The force’s policy is for so-called “stranger one rapes”, where victims do not know their attackers, to be investigated by major crime team detectives.
But The Argus can reveal officers have instead been called away to support their new colleagues in Surrey Police in the investigation into the shooting of a family in the Alps.
The murders took place on September 5 and sparked an international investigation.
The Brighton case happened early on September 7 and is being investigated by Brighton and Hove CID detectives.
In a paper delivered to Sussex Police Authority in June last year, chief constable Martin Richards said: “The investigations of all stranger one rapes are now retained within the major crime branch.”
That unit was then merged with Surrey Police’s equivalent in a £7.18 million savings scheme which also saw firearms and scientific support units come together as part of a £50 million cuts programme
It is understood that major crime officers do have supervision of the Brighton investigation and the detectives are in regular contact.
Detective Chief Inspector Nick Sloan said local detectives were equipped to deal with rape.
He said: “There are examples of murder, attempted murder and rape that have been dealt with very effectively by experienced divisional officers with major crime team oversight.
“It’s all about who is best placed to give the best service to the victim at the time.”
Alex Phillips , a Green member of Brighton and Hove City Council who sits on the city’s sexual violence reference group, took up the issue with police this week.
She said she had been “reassured” that the inquiry was “progressing well”, but said: “I remain concerned about the effect of government cuts on policing.
“Frontline services for vulnerable people are the cost of the govern- ment’s reckless austerity drive.”
THE CRIME
A 19-year-old woman was raped on Brighton beach by two men as a third man stood nearby early on September 7.
The woman, who was visiting from Kent and staying in a hotel, was grabbed as she walked between Coalition nightclub in Kings Road Arches and Regency Square between midnight and 2.30am.
Brighton and Hove detectives are trawling through CCTV footage, some of which shows the woman’s movements on the night.
But the officers have not identified any suspects.
They returned to the scene early on Friday morning to speak to people who are regularly in the area at that time of the week, but did not make a breakthrough.
The men are believed to be in their 30s and possibly Eastern
European.
Officers are appealing for anyone who saw a woman in a black dress with one flip-flop on to contact them.
Anyone with information about the rape is asked to call 101, quoting serial 101 of September 7, or Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555111.
Comments(6)
Dr.Draconian
says...
5:40pm Wed 19 Sep 12
angrymonkey
says...
6:02pm Wed 19 Sep 12
Dave At Home
says...
9:10pm Wed 19 Sep 12
angrymonkey wrote:If there is a chance of saving money and charging us more money, then let's do it.... Do we really need any cops in B&H any more? don't see them at the best of times.
Sussex police should be looking after Sussex people.
pitb
says...
7:35am Thu 20 Sep 12
funkyyoyo
says...
12:05pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Goldenwight says...
5:12pm Wed 19 Sep 12
Nobody would deny that rape is a serious and unpleasant crime. Are you suggesting that multiple murder is a lesser one, because that appears to be the thrust of your article.
And there is certainly no reportage there which suggests anything to do with "cuts" being responsible for detectives being deployed on (what most human beings would call more important) other issues. Perhaps the editorial staff cut the original article down?