Hundreds protest plans to close Hove care homes (From The Argus)
Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
Hundreds protest plans to close Hove care homes
3:50pm Monday 24th September 2012 in News By Tim Ridgway, Local government reporter
Hundreds of people have now protested against plans to shut two Hove care homes in a bid to cut costs.
Brighton and Hove City Council is currently consulting on closing some of its smaller homes, claiming the move will save £600,000 a year.
The local authority claims changes have to be made to the service, which it says has been running the same way for 25 years, if it is to combat Government cuts and improve care.
But campaigners, who have collected a petition of more than 1,600 signatures, claim it will have a detrimental effect on the lives of some of the most vulnerable people.
Sue Beatty, of Brighton and Hove Unison, said: “While acknowledging the difficult financial times councils face, it cannot be morally right to close homes for those service users who are probably the most vulnerable adults in our city purely for financial reasons.”
The local authority’s original plan, which was discussed in June, was to shut three homes.
The latest preferred option is to close the homes in Old Shoreham and New Church Road, both in Hove, and move clients to other care homes. The home in Ferndale Road will now not be affected.
This would put between eight and 13 jobs at risk although existing permanent staff are expected to be relocated.
Other options include maintaining the current system, handing the running over to the private sector or increasing the capacity at its current homes.
Rob Jarrett, the chairman of the council’s adult care and health committee, said: “We need to refocus and improve our service in order to deliver the best possible support to our most vulnerable residents.
“We are acutely aware of the sensitivities around asking people with learning disabilities to move house.
“Should the plan be agreed, we are committed to working in a kind and considerate manner with our clients and their families to do this in a way that minimises disruption and treats them with dignity.”
Labour councillor Anne Meadows said: “The closure of these care homes highlights once again that the Greens are struggling to look after the public purse.”
A decision will be taken at the council’s committee meeting today at Hove Town Hall at 4pm.
Comments(7)
bruce_
says...
4:20pm Mon 24 Sep 12
rolivan
says...
6:00pm Mon 24 Sep 12
You might be acutely aware but you are not in their shoes.Peoples Health needs whether they are Mental or Physical or both should be a priority over anything else and that includes Cycle lanes and the i360.
rayellerton
says...
8:25pm Mon 24 Sep 12
General Dreedle
says...
9:14pm Mon 24 Sep 12
The first priotity is (caps are from Green's manifesto):
'RESIST TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE, THE SERVICE CUTS AND PRIVATISATION IMPOSED ON LOCAL COUNCILS BY THE CONSERVATIVE AND LIB DEM GOVERNMENT'.
Newsflash Rob: Whilst the government is cutting subsidy to councils it is not imposing service cuts or privatisation. Those are decisions for local councils to make. Therefore you have to make choices between keeping vulnerable people in their homes or funding vanity projects like One Planet Living or the i360.
The manifesto goes on to make further promises:
'In the coming years of austerity a strong leadership that champions the needs of all vulnerable people will be of critical importance'.
Newsflash Councillor Rob. This means YOU have to show strong leadership as Chair of the Adult Care and Health Committee.
'Greens will continue to work with others to oppose government cuts to vital social care and health budgets'.
Newsflash Councillor Rob: The homes in question are Registerd Care Homes and therefore budgets are not limited but are driven by need. That means that whilst they are open the council has an obligation to fund the care costs. The government cannot cut the funding.
'We also believe services are better provided by public and third sector bodies whose first duty is to provide care rather than profit for shareholders'.
Newsflash Councillor Rob: If you close these homes the residents moving out will have to move into private homes that make a profit for owners.
'We will continue to to resist the further privatisation of care, which often leads to the provision of poor services'.
Newsflash Councillor Rob: Er, aren't you meant to be doing this?
The manifesto then goes on to list Green achievements including:
'Campaigned and spoke against closure of day centres and older people's homes such as Vernon Gardens'.
Question Councillor Rob: Why did you campaign against the closure of older people's homes whilst you are willing to close homes for people with Learning Disabilites? Could it be that they are easier to ease out as they have less of a voice?
It then says under the heading 'GREENS WILL' , 'Resist continuing privatisation and cuts to social care services'.
So councillor Rob as you settle down in your nice comfy home where you feel secure, put your slippers on and sip your mug of Horlicks ,ask yourself, 'will I resist'? Will I protect the homes of the most vulnerable in the town so they can fel secure as I do and enjoy their Horlicks as I do. Remember what happended to Councillor Summers when she when against party policy. You too could be hauled before the Ministry of Love if you don't tow the party line. Your colleagues have already sold out your Green principles by concreting over the Level and felling trees in Wild Park. Are you going to sell out the most vulnerable by turfing them out of their homes. If you do, the least you could do is provide them with free tickets to go up your i360 vanity project, where you don't seem to have any trouble lending £14million to a private investor. Please make a stand on this Councillor Jarrett.
Athena
says...
11:49pm Mon 24 Sep 12
Tel Scoomer
says...
12:47am Tue 25 Sep 12
And Tim Ridgway has it right in the intro when he writes "Hundreds of people have now protested against plans to shut two Hove care homes" - unlike the headline which misses out the word "against". It comes to something when the copy editors are illiterate.
Hove Actually says...
4:07pm Mon 24 Sep 12