Brighton's Volk's Railway to go solar

Brighton's Volk's Railway to go solar Brighton's Volk's Railway to go solar

Solar trees could help power the world’s oldest electric railway.

For nearly 130 years the Volk’s Railway has been operating along a mile stretch of the promenade from Brighton’s Palace Pier to Black Rock.

But Brighton and Hove City Council plans to spend about £1.5 million on a raft of changes to boost tourism and ensure its long-term future.

This includes planting a “solar forest” of five trees in Madeira Drive to catch the sun and generate enough energy to power the train all year round.

Chris English, of the Volk’s Electric Railway Association, said: “We very much welcome this exciting new initiative which is in the spirit of Magnus Volk, a man who would undoubtedly be developing such environmentally sound ideas if he lived in this century.

“When completed, the increased operation will surely raise the profile of not only the railway, but also the whole of the Madeira Drive area.”

However, historians have described it as a “harebrained scheme” and asked why the changes are needed.

Local historian David Rowland said: “I know this current council has been doing some strange things but why do they want to alter something which has been in existence for more than 100 years?

“I should think Mr Volk would be turning in his grave at the thought.”

The railway was opened in 1883 by Magnus Volk, the engineer and original owner of the line.

It passed into control of the council in 1940 and currently operates only from Easter to September.

The new proposal, which would allow it to open all year round, includes plans for an all-weather train.

It also features a new train shed with solar panels on the roof and a public viewing gallery.

The Argus understands the scheme would see electricity produced to power the railway, with any excess feeding into the National Grid.

In turn, on overcast days the railway would take energy from the National Grid.

The council believes the scheme would save it £6,000 a year in electricity bills.

The cost is £1.5 million although the local authority claims only £245,000 would come from the council, with the rest met by grants.

A planning application was submitted yesterday with a decision due in November.

If the plans are approved, the work will be carried out during the winter season of 2013 and completed by Easter 2014.

Council leader Jason Kitcat said: “If we are successful it will be the perfect example of what Brighton can do.

“It’s a massively exciting scheme.”

Comments(29)

PETE OF QUEENS PARK says...
9:58am Tue 2 Oct 12

So it is going to cost £1.5 million to save £6000 a year.not bad 250 years to break even and thats without interest. BRILLIANT !!!

nosolution says...
10:00am Tue 2 Oct 12

How about extending the line on into Hove, this will safeguard the railways future much more...

HJarrs says...
10:11am Tue 2 Oct 12

Is local historian David Rowland suggesting that this end of the sea front has been shabby for the last 100 years and should remain so? That in itself is a bit odd.

Paying £245000 to lever in an extra £1.25 million of funding for renovating an area and an attraction that have been left to decay over many years is a cute bit of business to my mind and will only serve to attract additional business to Brighton and Hove. I even bet the solar panels pay for themselves through the feed-in-tarrif and are a good public demonstration that this city is serious about tackling environmental issues.

Over to you moaners....

Goldenwight says...
10:11am Tue 2 Oct 12

I thought that all trees were solar energy converters?

It may not be cost effective, but if that artist's impression is accurate it will certainly be a crowd puller- looks fantastic!

Jimmy Stewart's Imaginary Rabbit says...
10:20am Tue 2 Oct 12

nosolution wrote:
How about extending the line on into Hove, this will safeguard the railways future much more...
Or at least extend it eastwards so that it goes all the way to the Marina.

Anyway, I imagine those large solar 'trees' on the seafront will really annoy the Regency Society - so I'm all in favour!

Jimmy Stewart's Imaginary Rabbit says...
10:21am Tue 2 Oct 12

HJarrs wrote:
Is local historian David Rowland suggesting that this end of the sea front has been shabby for the last 100 years and should remain so? That in itself is a bit odd.

Paying £245000 to lever in an extra £1.25 million of funding for renovating an area and an attraction that have been left to decay over many years is a cute bit of business to my mind and will only serve to attract additional business to Brighton and Hove. I even bet the solar panels pay for themselves through the feed-in-tarrif and are a good public demonstration that this city is serious about tackling environmental issues.

Over to you moaners....
No moans from me, I totally agree with you.

censored says...
10:46am Tue 2 Oct 12

David Rowland is an idiot.

It has to get it's energy from somewhere, getting it from a better and more innovative source doesn't affect the railway itself.

easyrider says...
10:48am Tue 2 Oct 12

Cheaper to enrol this city's oversupply of cyclists to pull the train 24 hours a day.

At least that would keep a few of the selfish s*ds off the footpaths.

Music Lover says...
11:07am Tue 2 Oct 12

This says it all about the arrogance of Brighton and Hove City Council.

With seafront businesses struggling like mad at the moment, they are going to blow £1.5m on something that saves £6k per year. Its ridiculous.

It will do nothing whatsoever to raise the profile of Madeira Drive which is basically a very expensive Car Park.

chrisso says...
11:21am Tue 2 Oct 12

easyrider wrote:
Cheaper to enrol this city's oversupply of cyclists to pull the train 24 hours a day. At least that would keep a few of the selfish s*ds off the footpaths.
As both a motorist and a cyclist, i can safely say it's the former that there is an oversupply of in Brighton. Gridlock again this morning,like yesterday, shame a few more of the lazy gits don't get on a bike whenever possible.

RustyRobot says...
11:26am Tue 2 Oct 12

I think you will find that £1.5m is for a lot more than just adding in some solar trees! If you care to read, the article describes a 'raft of changes' for this investment -Solar trees being just one of the improvements. This railway is part of our National Heritage, and part of the seafront - it should be preserved and improved for future generations to enjoy.

pwlr1966 says...
12:11pm Tue 2 Oct 12

RustyRobot wrote:
I think you will find that £1.5m is for a lot more than just adding in some solar trees! If you care to read, the article describes a 'raft of changes' for this investment -Solar trees being just one of the improvements. This railway is part of our National Heritage, and part of the seafront - it should be preserved and improved for future generations to enjoy.
Spot on.

billy goat-gruff says...
12:21pm Tue 2 Oct 12

What a great idea, south-facing Madeira Drive is a perfect location for solar panels, Magnus Volk would be proud (and would probably be a champion of personal electric vehicles). How about some wind turbines down the marina end too?

tidytime says...
1:07pm Tue 2 Oct 12

High speed volks all the way to hove? Cut out the pesky traffic and charge minimal fees to compete with the awful bus service!

Shouldn't we do something about the pier? The i360? all the unfinished works that the fickle council never seem to get completed?

Goldenwight says...
1:22pm Tue 2 Oct 12

Music Lover wrote:
This says it all about the arrogance of Brighton and Hove City Council.

With seafront businesses struggling like mad at the moment, they are going to blow £1.5m on something that saves £6k per year. Its ridiculous.

It will do nothing whatsoever to raise the profile of Madeira Drive which is basically a very expensive Car Park.
£245,000- read the article. And that figure is matched SEVEN times over by grants from outside sources, which sounds a pretty good deal to me.

F in L says...
1:28pm Tue 2 Oct 12

Close the Nursing Homes, we need a solar railway to nowhere.

Mr Sworld says...
2:20pm Tue 2 Oct 12

Local historian David Rowland said: “I know this current council has been doing some strange things but why do they want to alter something which has been in existence for more than 100 years?"

“I should think Mr Volk would be turning in his grave at the thought.”

Hardly Mr Rowland. I would think that, as an engineer himself, Magnus Volk would be overjoyed at the engineering and science that would enable his railway to run with sunlight!

lordenglandofsussex says...
2:30pm Tue 2 Oct 12

nosolution wrote:
How about extending the line on into Hove, this will safeguard the railways future much more...
I would extend it to Hove and right into the Marina.

Here's another suggestion: B&H Buses should invest in a city wide tram network. Most large cities now have them.

mustaphaLeeko says...
4:16pm Tue 2 Oct 12

tidytime wrote:
High speed volks all the way to hove? Cut out the pesky traffic and charge minimal fees to compete with the awful bus service!

Shouldn't we do something about the pier? The i360? all the unfinished works that the fickle council never seem to get completed?
Great idea!

Love the solar trees, and your idea of it going to hove!

As for the i360.. It's fully funded and going to be built (site commencement Autumn 2012) and open by March 2015 !!!!

go look at the loan agreement:

http://present.brigh
ton-hove.gov.uk/Publ
ished/C00000689/M000
04315/AI00028197/$20
120704093234_002467_
0008599_i360reportFI
NAL.docA.ps.pdf

davedebrax says...
6:24pm Tue 2 Oct 12

"why do they want to alter something which has been in existence for more than 100 years"

because the world needs to change or we won't need historians anymore!

davedebrax says...
6:28pm Tue 2 Oct 12

“If we are successful it will be the perfect example of what Brighton can do"

which is ... very little. Why can't a city like B&H have a modern, cheap and efficient public transport system?

Isn't this what a green council should deliver?

tengri says...
6:42pm Tue 2 Oct 12

davedebrax wrote:
“If we are successful it will be the perfect example of what Brighton can do"

which is ... very little. Why can't a city like B&H have a modern, cheap and efficient public transport system?

Isn't this what a green council should deliver?
Totally agree. The Greens have had a dose of reality and all their visions have gone out the window. Might just as well have Labour or Tories, they are all the same.

trolleyfan says...
7:52pm Tue 2 Oct 12

Volk's Electric Railway, being the oldest surviving electric line in the world should have more than National Heritage status. Like the cable cars in San Francisco it should have World Heritage Status.

Phani Tikkala says...
11:33am Wed 3 Oct 12

Goldenwight wrote:
Music Lover wrote:
This says it all about the arrogance of Brighton and Hove City Council.

With seafront businesses struggling like mad at the moment, they are going to blow £1.5m on something that saves £6k per year. Its ridiculous.

It will do nothing whatsoever to raise the profile of Madeira Drive which is basically a very expensive Car Park.
£245,000- read the article. And that figure is matched SEVEN times over by grants from outside sources, which sounds a pretty good deal to me.
Err... the net payment from Council Taxpayers is £245,000.

Saving £6,000 p.a. means it will take over 40 years to make back the investment.

A great deal for council tax payers....NOT

Hove Actually says...
10:28pm Wed 3 Oct 12

Saving £6,000 p.a. means it will take over 40 years to make back the investment.

No solar panel will last 40 years so that means the cost of repair and replacement will have to be factored in, not forgetting the feed in tariff will be LONG GONE before even the next 10 years has past

Goldenwight says...
8:12am Fri 5 Oct 12

Hove Actually wrote:
Saving £6,000 p.a. means it will take over 40 years to make back the investment.

No solar panel will last 40 years so that means the cost of repair and replacement will have to be factored in, not forgetting the feed in tariff will be LONG GONE before even the next 10 years has past
Granted. but it is certainly a lot less that paying back £1.5m. And how many other projects locally can attract 175% of local authority investment in contributions. And the saving to the Earth, the reduction in CO2 production, the increase in air quality and the reduction in our dependence on Foreign imported fuel with a knock on effect on our balance of payments.

And lets not forget the ancillary benefits. Not least of which is that these things look fantastic and will attract visitors from far and wide- who will hopefully spend money while here.

Not since Battersea Power Station has a power generation unit been such a design icon. Anyone going to disagree with THAT argument?

olebut says...
10:46am Fri 5 Oct 12

would make more sense to extend the railway to Hove lagoon with some new stations which would perhaps get some traffic of of the roads especially if it was an all year service

sasquatch2202 says...
4:59pm Fri 5 Oct 12

Why cant they run it on AA batteries? I hear you can get 8 for £5 at asda!

SimonS says...
11:57am Sun 7 Oct 12

Phani Tikkala wrote:
Goldenwight wrote:
Music Lover wrote:
This says it all about the arrogance of Brighton and Hove City Council.

With seafront businesses struggling like mad at the moment, they are going to blow £1.5m on something that saves £6k per year. Its ridiculous.

It will do nothing whatsoever to raise the profile of Madeira Drive which is basically a very expensive Car Park.
£245,000- read the article. And that figure is matched SEVEN times over by grants from outside sources, which sounds a pretty good deal to me.
Err... the net payment from Council Taxpayers is £245,000.

Saving £6,000 p.a. means it will take over 40 years to make back the investment.

A great deal for council tax payers....NOT
Read the article again, and you'd see the £1.5m is for more than just the solar panels.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree