Jenkins warns of tower threat to Brighton and Hove's Regency glory

An influential conservationist has called for Brighton and Hove’s planners to look past tall towers.

Broadcaster Sir Simon Jenkins made the comments after he addressed scores of people at an event in the Royal Pavilion organised by the Regency Society.

It comes as high-rise blocks are part of planned developments for Conway Street in Hove, and Preston Barracks sites, all of which could be presented to planners in the next few years.

Other tall buildings with planning approval include the i360 observation tower and the Brunswick development scheme at Brighton Marina.

Sir Simon, who is president of the group, which acts as an umbrella organisation for all the conservation groups in the city, said: “The greatest threat to Brighton today is what it has always been – new buildings that pay no respect to the old ones.

“What is this obsession with towers? I can’t believe some of the things that are proposed.

“You can build low-rise, five to seven storey buildings that would be infinitely more sympathetic.”

The talk was part of a wider weekend organised by the influential Regency Society, which was the biggest event it had been involved in since the early Regency Festivals of the 1940s and 1950s.

More than 200 people attended various events, which was headed by a keynote speech by historian and TV presenter Dan Cruickshanks.

Among the programme were walks and talks, including “So what did the Regency give us?”

Professor David Robson, the vice-chairman of the Regency Society, led a walk around the townscape of Amon Henry Wilds with a focus on Brunswick Town.

He said: “Architects and planners today would do well to look at examples of Regency town planning.

“Look at our seafront squares, which combine relatively high density housing with open spaces.”

Professor Gavin Henderson, a vice-president of the Regency Society and a former director of the Brighton Festival, said: “The example set by the lifestyle of the Prince Regent in Brighton gave legitimacy to excessive behaviour at the seaside – a fantasy world where normal moral codes are lifted.

“It’s an attitude that persists in some ways today.”

Mary McKean, chairman of the Regency Society, said: “What’s come out of this weekend is a great sense of Brighton as a most exhilarating, exciting place – vibrant, outrageous but of huge beauty and great good taste.

“It’s been a pleasure to explore and share our Regency heritage with so many people both from the city and well beyond it.”

Comments(9)

leobrighton says...
5:33pm Tue 16 Oct 12

Its either towers or building on the countryside. Which do you prefer?

pwlr1966 says...
5:47pm Tue 16 Oct 12

I would have thought that when these regency buildings were first erected, it was quite a shock to the poor fishing villagers of the time, but nowadays they are revered like a seventh wonder of the world. Its called progress, get over it. I would prefer to build as much on brown field sites than start hacking into .the south downs

Hove Actually says...
6:09pm Tue 16 Oct 12

Why settle for sympathetic development that enhances the lives of everyone when you can get high density to generate fives times the council tax and offer the chance for more parking revenue from "residents" parking

John Fallon says...
7:13pm Tue 16 Oct 12

The point he was making is that you can have high-density housing and attractive housing at the same time, which is what Regency squares are. So why not create new squares at Toads Hole Valley rather that another dreary suburb? Towers aren't progress, as we've seen from the monstrosities put up in the 60s and 70s. Going back to them would be going back to ghettos in the sky.

rolivan says...
7:17pm Tue 16 Oct 12

Brighton which is quite hilly poses a different question when it comes to construction so why not build more into the sides of the Hills and Hove which is Flatter could have more Squares with Community amenities in the centre.We can spend untold amounts of money elsewhere but it seems the City Planners do not want to entertain anything beyond the norm when it comes to Housing and without that there is no revenue.

Roundbill says...
11:43pm Tue 16 Oct 12

rolivan wrote:
Brighton which is quite hilly poses a different question when it comes to construction so why not build more into the sides of the Hills and Hove which is Flatter could have more Squares with Community amenities in the centre.We can spend untold amounts of money elsewhere but it seems the City Planners do not want to entertain anything beyond the norm when it comes to Housing and without that there is no revenue.
Why do you Keep using random Capital letters? Is it Some sort Of code?

vivelavive says...
7:49am Wed 17 Oct 12

When these Regency squares were built they were considered swanky properties and homes to the wealthy. They weren't filled up with local fisherman and barrow boys!

Given the current economic climate, not to mention the problems faced by people getting onto the property ladder and the ever increasing population in our city, what we need isn't landmark architectural design for more wealthy londoners to buy up. We need large numbers of affordable units. And as leobrighton rightly said; it's either this or build in the countryside.

Jimmy Stewart's Imaginary Rabbit says...
8:19am Wed 17 Oct 12

The Regency heritage is great, but Brighton is a living, evolving city not a museum. No one's suggesting knocking down Sussex Square and replacing it our own version of the Shard, but on the other hand there's nothing wrong with tall buildings per se. Saying "It's a tower so it has no place in Brighton" isn't a good enough reason not to build one.

This is the 21st century, and as has been mentioned with the population rapidly expanding we either build up or out.

bruce_ says...
11:15am Wed 17 Oct 12

One "tower" we definitely don't need is the i360: no-one can live there, and how many will be able to afford even to go up? Take a bus ride to Devil's Dyke or Ditchling Beacon, if you want a good view: stretch your legs, not your budget!

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree