Business News RSS Feed


Facelift for Brighton Centre

Geoffrey Bowden, Bill Randall and Adam Bates at the refurbished Brighton Centre Geoffrey Bowden, Bill Randall and Adam Bates at the refurbished Brighton Centre

The ribbon has been cut on a new era for the Brighton Centre.

Brighton and Hove City Council leader Bill Randall was joined by tourism cabinet member Geoffrey Bowden in marking the official opening of the refurbished seafront venue.

It comes after £1 million was promised to build a new front, fit new doors, improve the foyer and redesign the restaurant – after replacement of over 4,000 seats, interiors modernised and meeting facilities improved.

Howard Barden, the Brighton Centre acting general manager, said: “With the completion of these works, we anticipate we will greatly enhance the delegate and visitor experience keeping the venue competitive and relevant on both the national and international conference venues scene.”

It has a capacity of 5,000 with the largest purpose-built conference and exhibition space in the south of England.

More news from The Argus

Daily Echo on Facebook - facebook.com/southerndailyecho Like us on Facebook

Google+ Add us to your circles on Google+

Comments(13)

remluf says...
7:39pm Fri 6 Jan 12

I thought the Brighton centre and Kingswest bulding were both being demolished and replaced with one new building.
That's what needs to happen.
And the link to Churchill Square should be restored. It used to connect to the side of Tescos.

rolivan says...
7:40pm Fri 6 Jan 12

Hope for a million pounds they don't end up with revolving door syndrome

Spx says...
7:42pm Fri 6 Jan 12

Will the doors help prevent the ingress of woodchip dust from Shoreham Harbour!

richardsim7 says...
8:12pm Fri 6 Jan 12

What a great article, perhaps a picture next time might be an idea though

jyan says...
11:38pm Fri 6 Jan 12

Are the councillors a permanent revolving feature?

bug eye says...
12:07am Sat 7 Jan 12

take an ugly 70s building and make it uglier with even more brown glass and frames. surely a contemporary makeover could have made this building quirky and interesting, but I suppose with the backward planning policies of the council this is what you get, pastiche.

george smith says...
9:15am Sat 7 Jan 12

On the article above that we are not allowed to comment on , I thought the travellers were here visiting relatives for Xmas - mind when I visit relatives I stay in a small hotel nearby. In is now January so why haven't they moved on?

Morpheus says...
10:38am Sat 7 Jan 12

george smith wrote:
On the article above that we are not allowed to comment on , I thought the travellers were here visiting relatives for Xmas - mind when I visit relatives I stay in a small hotel nearby. In is now January so why haven't they moved on?
Exactly my thoughts when I read about visiting relatives yesterday. If we did this with a caravan we would soon be moved on.

Hotbeans says...
10:57am Sat 7 Jan 12

Erm, so the doors look like any other revolving doors. What does the refurbished building look like??

moronslayer says...
12:59pm Sun 8 Jan 12

Hotbeans wrote:
Erm, so the doors look like any other revolving doors. What does the refurbished building look like??
It looks much the same - drab brown glass. The pillars that used to be outside of the front doors have been enclosed.
It's funny how often building work costs a million pounds. I suppose it's an easier number to remember. I wonder if the figure was rounded up, or down.

Berkshire Hunt says...
3:43pm Sun 8 Jan 12

amazing...

Dingdong123 says...
4:22pm Sun 8 Jan 12

Ugliest building in england,should of bulldozed it

RottingdeanRant says...
4:15pm Mon 9 Jan 12

Morpheus wrote:
george smith wrote:
On the article above that we are not allowed to comment on , I thought the travellers were here visiting relatives for Xmas - mind when I visit relatives I stay in a small hotel nearby. In is now January so why haven't they moved on?
Exactly my thoughts when I read about visiting relatives yesterday. If we did this with a caravan we would soon be moved on.
I wonder why we are not permitted to comment on the article about the travellers? I this some form of discrimination? Or maybe the council are scared of the obvious answer to 'Brighton and Hove City Council officials said they were aware of the new camp and were deciding what to do about it.' which is to get go to court immediately to evict them and do this immediately every time this occurs. Or is that too difficult?

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree