- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@brightonargus
All the latest news and view from the Argus
@theargusoffers
The latest offers and competitions from the Argus
@theargusguide
The best events in Brighton, Hove and Sussex
@ArgusMagazine
Features, interviews, TV, travel and lifestyle from the Argus
- Find us on Facebook
The Argus
The Argus - news, sport and leisure for Brighton, Hove and Sussex
The Argus Offers and Competitions
Keep up to date with all the offers, events and competitions from the Argus
Architect chosen for £100m Hove Station revamp (From The Argus)
Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
Architect chosen for £100m Hove Station revamp
12:46pm Tuesday 3rd July 2012 in Business News By John Keenan
WINNER: Nick Lomax's plans for Hove Station
An architect has been picked for a £100 million transformation of a derelict area.
Developers Matsim Properties has chosen architect Nick Lomax and his firm LCE to redesign the area around Hove Station.
The proposed scheme, revealed last week by The Argus, features five dome-shaped towers, with the tallest 60m high.
The plan will involve the building of several hundred homes and at least 100,000 square feet of office space creating 1,000 jobs.
It will also include a nine-screen Vue cinema and an art gallery. The go-ahead for the transformation of the six-acre site in Conway Street, Ellen Street and Fonthill Road relies on the successful sale of The Argus headquarters in Hollingbury to Brighton and Hove Buses.
Nick Lomax, boss at LCE, which also mastermined the Jubilee Street redevelopment said: “This is the right place to build tall buildings. I was really taken with the developer’s idea for a real mixed-use scheme.
“There is a tension between traditional and modern ideas in the area which has to be sensitively managed but this has to happen quickly. I think we can see work start within 18 months.”
Andy Lambor, managing director of Matsim said his firm choose LCE, based in Western Road Brighton, because the architect’s ideas blended with the developer’s plans.
Mr Lambor said the size, shape and positioning of the tall towers will evolve as the finer details of the scheme emerge.
He said: “We now get down to detail and start the planning process. We intend to submit our planning application within four months.
“We have a window in time with both the existing tenants at the site and the bus company where everything can fall into place, otherwise the opportunity could be lost.
“We hope our team and the local authority will all work towards delivering a scheme that will transform the area around Hove station.”
Hove MP Mike Weatherley said: “If the team behind this project continues to be open to ideas from those living nearby then I am certainly inclined to support.
“These are early proposals so lots will no doubt change but people need to know that Hove and Brighton are open for business.”
But critics accused the architects and planners of putting forward a crowded, dreary and outsize plan.
The unsuccessful architects competing for the project were Russ Drage, in Fleet Street, Brighton and Orbit in London.
Comments(17)
Ligand Fields
says...
1:12pm Tue 3 Jul 12
om/in/nicklomax NICE
saveHOVE
says...
3:05pm Tue 3 Jul 12
Wiggsy wrote:What is the difference between an IMAX and a multiplex cinema? I'm interested to know. The scheme proposes 9 screens at present.
Given the size of the development I'll be interested to see the proposals on how the infrastructure will be able to support this. Also would prefer to see a purpose built IMAX cinema rather than a multiplex if this all does go ahead.
saveHOVE
says...
3:15pm Tue 3 Jul 12
The towers got fatter, apparently, in order to fit in the required number of flats.
The original inspiration for them was a billowing sail. The design should be narrowed back down to that look in order to avoid a heavy, lumpen and downbeat presence on this site that would be a stark mismatch with the Clarendon and Ellen Estate's 10 storey blocks of flats close by.
brightonline
says...
3:57pm Tue 3 Jul 12
OnAPositiveNote
says...
4:02pm Tue 3 Jul 12
bug eye
says...
4:08pm Tue 3 Jul 12
I would like to know if the horrible council flats already there could be renovated in exchange for less social homes on the new site.
I hope the council will not fall back on its archaeic planning policies like they are trying to do for the old Sackville hotel site, or we will end up with bland bland bland. we need more contemporary developments for the hove seafront Kingsway too, to get rid of the mid 20th century styling and be different from brightons regency frontage. finally a great imax cinema and not a multiplex would be better as we have 2 multis in the city already, hove needs quality, and I am pleased to see there is an art gallery proposed too, although would be better at the King Alfred site with the sea views.
Hovite
says...
4:36pm Tue 3 Jul 12
saveHOVE wrote:Why didn't you finance a design yourself and enter the competition?
The saveHOVE report following the meeting on Monday morning with MATSIM's Andy Lambor and LCE's Nick Lomax can be read on the saveHOVE website.
The towers got fatter, apparently, in order to fit in the required number of flats.
The original inspiration for them was a billowing sail. The design should be narrowed back down to that look in order to avoid a heavy, lumpen and downbeat presence on this site that would be a stark mismatch with the Clarendon and Ellen Estate's 10 storey blocks of flats close by.
wildejon
says...
4:52pm Tue 3 Jul 12
IMAX is a different way of filming (70mm film ve 35mm) which when projected needs a much larger screen. The IMAX in London (which is amazing but also a long way to travel!) is 20m tall. Having something like that in Brighton and Hove rather than another standard cinema is a brilliant suggestion. Something other than yet another 'entertainment park' suits the Brighton and Hove vibe for sure.
alyn, southwick
says...
8:22pm Tue 3 Jul 12
brightonline wrote:If it includes all the areas coloured in on the architects drawing it includes some derelict or very old and dilapidated buildings (that look like they are falling down, crumbling and grottey).
It's currently NOT a derelict area? This seems to smack of the Argus wanting to promote and push through the sale of it's own printing works, where the paper used to be printed, for a huge sum of money and downsize to a small office in the town centre where it's small band of reporters can work from.
Wiggsy
says...
10:21pm Tue 3 Jul 12
saveHOVE wrote:IMAX would distinguish the city with one of the few purpose built IMAX cinema's - refer to either of following for info; http://en.wikipedia.
Wiggsy wrote:What is the difference between an IMAX and a multiplex cinema? I'm interested to know. The scheme proposes 9 screens at present.
Given the size of the development I'll be interested to see the proposals on how the infrastructure will be able to support this. Also would prefer to see a purpose built IMAX cinema rather than a multiplex if this all does go ahead.
org/wiki/IMAX or http://www.bfi.org.u
k/whatson/bfi_imax
Wiggsy
says...
10:26pm Tue 3 Jul 12
wildejon wrote:It seems like such a big opportunity being missed that we don't have something like this, and I don't mean the one like in Crawley, but something like the BFI screen you refer to - one can only I guess!!
@saveHOVE
IMAX is a different way of filming (70mm film ve 35mm) which when projected needs a much larger screen. The IMAX in London (which is amazing but also a long way to travel!) is 20m tall. Having something like that in Brighton and Hove rather than another standard cinema is a brilliant suggestion. Something other than yet another 'entertainment park' suits the Brighton and Hove vibe for sure.
Ligand Fields
says...
9:30am Wed 4 Jul 12
Killjoy
says...
9:49am Wed 4 Jul 12
Gordtheganjaman
says...
11:43am Wed 4 Jul 12
wolf miguel
says...
8:26pm Wed 4 Jul 12
Turtledoo
says...
10:00am Thu 5 Jul 12
Wiggsy says...
12:59pm Tue 3 Jul 12
Also would prefer to see a purpose built IMAX cinema rather than a multiplex if this all does go ahead.