News RSS Feed


Jobs to go at Shoreham Airport


Jobs are being axed and opening hours could be slashed at Shoreham Airport.

The plans announced by airport owner Albemarle Shoreham Airport Limited have sent shockwaves of dismay through staff and many of the businesses based there.

Bosses are conducting what they have described as a “review of airport activities” and said there needs to be a number of redundancies to stem losses at the historic Art Deco airfield.

Although Albemarle refused to say exactly how many jobs would go, a source at the airport told The Argus as many as two people from each department faced the chop.

This includes administration, air traffic control, security and even the fire and safety crew.

Albemarle also admitted that the airport's opening hours are being reviewed but a spokesman added: “We are not prepared to discuss that at present.”

The turmoil at the airport, which is home to more than 50 aviation firms and other businesses, has prompted fears for its long-term future.

But in a statement Albemarle said it had no plans to close Shoreham.

The company bought the airport for a nominal £10 after the collapse of Croydon-based property group Erinaceous, which paid £8.6 million to former joint owners Brighton and Hove City Council and Worthing Borough Council.

Under an agreement with the councils, Albemarle is committed to keeping it running as an airport for 35 years and has spent £4 million on air-side improvement over the next four years.


Your Say YourArgus

Christophe Hawtree, Hove says...
10:03pm Sat 6 Feb 10

The airport was not a place to take seriously after it began to call itself Brighton City, and that phrase in brackets in the middle of the orginal name Shoreham Airport.

ArthurD, Horsham says...
9:24am Sun 7 Feb 10

Having learnt to fly at the much busier Elstree airfield, it is possible to operate without professional ATC (though it's a wonderful service to have).

Many small airfields get by with fewer staff and more involvement from volunteers etc. Shoreham has always seemed to have a pretention for greater things which has sadly never materialised.

I don't see any threat to it's future as a airfield if the expenditure matches the reality and not the dream. Alternatively find a seriously rich sponsor to invest in expansion.

Any piece of land is tempting to developers but that would a sad waste, there are plenty of other place to build on.

However to open a small station on the railway line that passes the terminal would be an obvious thing to do to encourage more access.

It could also be used more as a venue for events, concerts and so on.

another village idiot, Hassocks says...
12:43pm Sun 7 Feb 10

ArthurD wrote:
Having learnt to fly at the much busier Elstree airfield, it is possible to operate without professional ATC (though it's a wonderful service to have). Many small airfields get by with fewer staff and more involvement from volunteers etc. Shoreham has always seemed to have a pretention for greater things which has sadly never materialised. I don't see any threat to it's future as a airfield if the expenditure matches the reality and not the dream. Alternatively find a seriously rich sponsor to invest in expansion. Any piece of land is tempting to developers but that would a sad waste, there are plenty of other place to build on. However to open a small station on the railway line that passes the terminal would be an obvious thing to do to encourage more access. It could also be used more as a venue for events, concerts and so on.
You make a good point here about the airports' pretentions. Most people see it as a hobby airport, they have no idea how to access what is on offer there. Perhaps if the owners put some effort into advertising the place and making the things you suggest happen, the jobs will come back.

Lil, Worthing says...
1:28pm Sun 7 Feb 10

Christophe Hawtree wrote:
The airport was not a place to take seriously after it began to call itself Brighton City, and that phrase in brackets in the middle of the orginal name Shoreham Airport.
Perhaps only outdone by London Ashford Airport...

ArthurD, Horsham says...
2:39pm Sun 7 Feb 10

I think you mean "London Lydd airport" - but at least Shoreham is near Brighton and the airport could have a direct rail link there quite easily for the price of some concrete platforms and a ticket machine.

Easing the restrictions on usage (for example allow circuit training on Sundays) would make it more viable. Most airfields are busiest at weekends for leisure users.

micky adams, Brighton says...
8:02pm Sun 7 Feb 10

Brighton will need an airport with a rail link in the future as will most major cities in the UK. Wise up or get left behind.

Christophe Hawtree, Hove says...
8:13pm Sun 7 Feb 10

micky adams wrote:
Brighton will need an airport with a rail link in the future as will most major cities in the UK. Wise up or get left behind.
Is "Brighton", or whatever one calls it, a "major city"?

bug eye, hove says...
8:54pm Sun 7 Feb 10

its obviously an important airport to host such a vast airshow every year. also there are many companies that rent sites here. the problem is it is underinvested in its lovely 1930s art deco terminal building, it looks sad and naff. a makeover is what is needed and then the venue could be used for filming evening entertainment and a proper restaurant with a dining experience and not a dirty old cafe. the fact there is no station does not help and the new owner now have introduced pay and display parking another no no that would put people off just visiting on a sunday afternoon. could be a gold mine for someone with the right brain.

UglyAmerican, Hotlanta says...
12:00am Mon 8 Feb 10

Hey now Bug Eye, don't be slagging the cafe. That's one of the best full English breakfasts I've had in your land.

Comments are closed on this article.


Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »