Analysis RSS Feed


Should drivers pay more for petrol?

12:58pm Friday 29th August 2008

comment Comments (5)   Have your say »


This week a report claimed families in Sussex were paying almost £800 too much in “green taxes”. The Taxpayers’ Alliance called on the Government to cut taxes, especially on the forecourts where soaring petrol prices were crippling drivers financially. Yet should we in fact be paying more for our petrol? Here are two very different opinions on the subject.

Yes
Ben Duncan, Brighton and Hove City Councillor and Green Party parliamentary candidate for Brighton Kemptown.

Of course no one wants to pay more for anything, especially in times of rising prices. The cost of housing, food and fuel – for heating our homes as well as getting us about – are all rocketing, with wages failing to keep up.

It’s vital that we urgently address these economic woes, and that means changing the way we do business on a whole range of fronts.

That includes reining in the vast profits of the energy companies with windfall taxes, improving and subsidising public transport and tackling fuel poverty by ensuring everyone has access to better energy efficiency measures to keep our homes warm.

Domestic insulation should be free for everyone, for example.

We should be promoting locally produced food, as Green councillors have made sure Brighton and Hove’s schools will be doing. The shorter the trip from farmyard to dinner plate, the lower the cost of food.

As for the chaos in the housing market, we must introduce tough regulations on the banking sector to stop the financial fat cats who got us into this mess from gambling away any hard-fought economic recovery – and call an immediate moratorium on all repossessions.

All of these measures will make life more affordable, sustainable and fair.

But none of them will be able to make much difference to forecourt petrol prices. Energy analysts are increasingly warning that we’re hitting the moment of “peak oil” – at which demand increases faster than new oil fields are being found.

The law of supply and demand economics means this is bound to push prices up further.

Of course the Government can tinker around with the rate at which at which petrol is taxed, and it can even subsidise the oil giants by paying them to produce more cheap fuel.

But I believe that is short-sighted.

As supplies dwindle it can only get more expensive to do this and before long we’ll be facing the same problems as we are today, but with higher tax bills and a little less in the treasury to help tackle them.

And, of course, there are the increased greenhouse gas emissions that come with burning fossil fuels rather than seeking alternatives.

Surely it’s better for us to start making the shift to a greener, cheaper, fairer, society now, and implement measures to make life a little more affordable. Even if that means having to pay a little more for petrol on the forecourt.

No
Matthew Sinclair, policy analyst at the TaxPayers’ Alliance.

Government estimates show we have among the highest taxes on petrol in Europe, never mind countries such as the US and China where taxes on motor fuel are negligible.

British drivers also pay increasing amounts in road tax under the new vehicle excise duty regime. Motorists already pay VAT on their cars and petrol, so fuel duty and vehicle excise duty constitute premiums on top of the rate of tax that is considered fair on other goods and services.

That premium is justified on the basis that it corrects for externalities. The idea behind green taxes is that when people buy petrol, or other goods that create environmental harms, they should also pay the cost to wider society, now and in the future, of the associated contribution to climate change – the externalities.

That way, they will only buy each gallon of petrol or watt of power if the benefits to them of using it outweigh the costs both to themselves and the rest of us.

The TaxPayers’ Alliance report entitled The Burden of Green Taxes, released this week, showed British green taxes go far beyond correcting for the externalities and are therefore excessive, to the tune of £783 per household.

The biggest green taxes – fuel duty and vehicle excise duty – charge drivers far more than any mainstream estimate of the damage motorists create by contributing to climate change, even if you take into account the cost of road building.

The Institute for Fiscal Studies, when it looked at fuel duty, concluded it was “much higher in the UK than the environmental cost of vehicle emissions would appear to justify”. This is particularly unfair because many people who drive can’t realistically choose an alternative means of transport. Outside major cities public transport isn’t a viable alternative to the car.

That is why driving accounts for 85% of passenger trips, against just 7% by train and 6% by bus or coach. Even if we could double the capacity on the trains that would barely make a dent in the numbers driving.

Politicians should stop using green rhetoric as a cover for tax rises and we should pay less for our petrol, not more.

What do you think? Comment below.


Your Say YourArgus

cjwirth, Small Town, Veracruz, Mexico says...
3:51pm Fri 29 Aug 08

We will pay a lot more for gasoline and heating oil, soon.

According to energy investment banker Matthew Simmons and most independent analysts, global oil production is now declining, from 74 million barrels per day to 60 million barrels per day by 2015. During the same time demand will increase 14%.

This is equivalent to a 33% drop in 7 years. No one can reverse this trend, nor can we conserve our way out of this catastrophe. Because the demand for oil is so high, it will always be higher than production; thus the depletion rate will continue until all recoverable oil is extracted.

Alternatives will not even begin to fill the gap. And most alternatives yield electric power, but we need liquid fuels for tractors/combines, 18 wheel trucks, trains, ships, and mining equipment.

Surviving Peak Oil: We are facing the collapse of the highways that depend on diesel trucks for maintenance of bridges, cleaning culverts to avoid road washouts, snow plowing, roadbed and surface repair. When the highways fail, so will the power grid, as highways carry the parts, transformers, steel for pylons, and high tension cables, all from far away. With the highways out, there will be no food coming in from "outside," and without the power grid virtually nothing works, including home heating, pumping of gasoline and diesel, airports, communications, and automated systems.

This is documented in a free 48 page report that can be downloaded, website posted, distributed, and emailed: http://www.peakoilas
sociates.com/POAnaly
sis.html

I used to live in NH-USA, but moved to a sustainable place. Anyone interested in relocating to a nice, pretty, sustainable area with a good climate and good soil? Email: clifford dot wirth at yahoo dot com or give me a phone call which operates here as my old USA-NH number 603-668-4207. http://survivingpeak
oil.blogspot.com/

Bobster, Shoreham says...
4:10pm Fri 29 Aug 08

How does an imbecile like Ben Duncan end up in a public office, allegedly representing the community?

It is impossible to use public transport effectively for everyday transport unless you live and work near bus stops/ railway stations.

Society just hasn't panned out that way - most people live far too far from their place of work to make it practical.

If the land were flat and it didn't rain every day more people would cycle but you can't cycle 10 miles in the pouring rain to an office job.

Ben Duncan clearly lives in another country.

chris elmes, shoreham by sea says...
5:51pm Sun 31 Aug 08

There is no such thing as a green tax it is just a tax as are the ones on littering,smokeing,r
ubbish bins ect, more extortion from this (in my opinion)corrupt & treasonous Labour government a herd of swine with their snouts buryed deep in the trough.

WAR IS PEACE,IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH,FREEDOM IS SLAVERY.
Welcome to Labour's Orwellian nightmare.

Scorpion, Newhaven says...
5:18pm Mon 1 Sep 08

I have some sympathy with people who say we pay too much in tax. Very true. The government could and maybe should tinker with fuel taxes to give us a more balanced tax.

Its also inevitable that the oil is going to run out so the government could be looking at spending some of this ill-gotton gain on getting new technologies online. How about hydrogen delivery systems in petrol stations? Lets encourage hydrogen driven vehicles. Or something else.

Whats this government doing. Nothing. Taking the money and running. The people getting my vote won't necessarily be the people promising tax cuts but the people showing initiative for the long term.

King from Hove, Hove says...
8:04am Tue 2 Sep 08

We all know that Green taxes are a con.It is just another excuse for stealth taxing.We get fined for not recycling correctly and then hear that waste is all dumped together and a lot is shipped to Indian landfill sites

Your sayYourArgus

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE The Argus account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?
Should drivers pay more for petrol? Should drivers pay more for petrol?

Sponsored Links


Local Services


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »