News RSS Feed


Dimas banner

Lap-dancing clubs exploiting women

11:25am Friday 4th April 2008

comment Comments (10)   Have your say »


Since 2005, Brighton and Hove has seen five strip clubs open. It is a similar situation in the rest of Sussex.

Here, Hove Labour MP Celia Barlow argues there should be a change in the law to stop lap-dancing establishments being as easy to license as a café or ballet school.

Lap-dancing clubs and places that offer "exotic dancing" create the impression that paying for sex and objectifying women is acceptable in our society.

The increasingly sophisticated marketing and advertising of such venues, usually aimed at an upmarket clientele, show that such views are becoming more prevalent than they already are.

It has been a progressive decade for women's rights, but the spread of these clubs lead to the normalisation of paying for sex and exploiting women, and thus an erosion of hard fought-for rights.

Lap-dancing has been linked by research to prostitution, human trafficking and an increase in sex crimes against women.

For example, a 2003 report by the Lilth Project found that the rate of sexual assault increased by 50 per cent in Camden following the opening of lap-dancing clubs in the area.

The proliferation of such clubs has helped normalise the commercial sex industry and has implicitly promoted paying for sexual services as a legitimate activity.

The 2003 Licensing Act has made it easier for clubs and pubs to obtain licences for adult shows.

Under the current rules, councils are severely restricted in their powers to reject such licence applications if they feel they are inappropriate.

The loopholes in the Act effectively mean lap-dancing establishments are now licensed in the same way as cafés and ballet schools.

The recent increase in the number of such clubs in Brighton and Hove since the introduction of the 2003 Licensing Act show the legislation isn't working as it should.

I have seen the impact of this in my own constituency.

The Portland Hotel in Portland Road, Hove, recently applied for a licence to host regular exotic dance nights, causing much upset to the local community.

The pub is at the heart of a residential community and is close to schools, youth groups and places of worship, making it an entirely inappropriate location for such events.

While Brighton and Hove's licensing committee turned down the application, the landlord has appealed to the magistrates' court and experience from other areas of the country shows that decisions by councillors are often overturned by the courts.

Other places right across the country have faced similar battles and it is only right that the communities affected by these decisions have the final say on the matter.

Among MPs and peers in Parliament there is a strong coalition for a change in the law. Together with Object, the campaign group against the objectification of women and the normalisation of the porn and sex industries, local authorities and politicians of all parties want a review of the 2003 Licensing Act.

We want strip clubs, lap-dancing clubs and other venues that put on adult shows to be classified as "sex encounter establishments".

This would make them part of the sex industry and allow councils to have greater control and influence over them for the benefit of our communities.

Along with city councillor Gill Mitchell, I recently met Government minister Gerry Sutcliffe who has responsibility for licensing, to ask him to announce a review of the law.

The following day he announced that he was looking into the possibility of a review and also promised to consult with Government colleagues over a permanent change in the law.

Other colleagues have met with Government ministers urging them to call for a review and the responses have been encouraging.

But we need to keep the pressure up to ensure such reviews take place and close the loopholes so that power is handed back to local communities.

You can sign a petition in support of our campaign at www.celiabarlow.org.uk.


Your Say YourArgus

puddingandpi, brighton says...
12:24pm Fri 4 Apr 08

Yes, it is indeed exploiting women.
Don't let anyone tell you any different.
I know, it's voluntary, some women enjoy doing it, they make loads of money - I know all the arguements, it doesn't change anything.

confused, says...
1:03pm Fri 4 Apr 08

puddingandpi wrote:
Yes, it is indeed exploiting women. Don't let anyone tell you any different. I know, it's voluntary, some women enjoy doing it, they make loads of money - I know all the arguements, it doesn't change anything.
Exploit:
'Make use of unfairly'
'Benefit unjustly from the work of'

So how do you square that with your correct statements that it's:
a) voluntary
b)enjoyable
c) lucrative
???

SevenDialsDave, Brighton says...
9:59am Sat 5 Apr 08

Just out of interest where are these 5 lap dancing clubs. I only know of Rouge and Grace. Top Totty has already closed I think.

All sounds exaggerated to me. All this mean minded politics just to stop a few people having a bit of fun.

mnairb, Hove says...
8:13am Sun 6 Apr 08

Is the MP for Celia Barlow trying to get into the appalling Harriet Harpersons' sisterhood clan?

I thought that Celia would have had more important things to do with her time - like working out what she is going to do after the next election, for example.

Incidentally, I pass the Pussycat club in Hove regularly and have not noticed reports of an increase in sexual attacks in the area, or anywhere else in the city for that matter. Perhaps Celia and her chums should stop using ambiguous reports to their own advantage.

bored at work, work says...
1:14pm Mon 7 Apr 08

I know how to program computers. For that simple fact I am being exploited daily by having to go to work and spend all day stuck behind a computer screen, with the occasional break so I can write pointless messages on the Argus website. Should I refuse to work, I will have my house repossesed and find myself on the street. What is Celia Barlow going to do to put a stop this form of exploitation I wonder? Obviously she would make it harder for companies to start up, and remove the threat of this exploitation taking place, commonly referred to as "having to go to work in order to pay the bills"

Chris, Hove says...
1:40pm Mon 7 Apr 08

As usual the politicians have got it wrong. It is the men that are being exploited, as their natural urges are being used as a walking ATM by the women. As both these politicians are women maybe a little envy has crept in, or perhaps being a politician, they just need the column inches ?.

Terry walpole, Queens Park says...
8:31am Wed 9 Apr 08

The Lilith Project
The clue is in the name.

John W., Hove says...
1:41pm Tue 22 Apr 08

It seems to me that if anyone is being exploited, it's the men who pay! Any increase in sexual assault around the clubs would quickly be picked up by the police and be highlighted by them. Drink causes the violence, not the dancing women. You may not like it, it may offend your principles and it may not be done very well but it's legal, expensive, quite possibly a waste of time but dangerous/exploiting women? Absolutely not.

Peter, Brighton says...
2:05pm Tue 22 Apr 08

There's another agenda here, the feminist one. It decrees that women have no right to exploit their bodies if they so wish because that would only serve the voyeuristic inclinations of men. Frankly, that seems a perfect match, with both sides of the bargain getting something that they want with no one else being involved who doesn't want to be. No, this is not what feminists -- or feminist politicians -- can accept. A woman actually enjoying such a job? No way -- it must be just a male fantasy.

laura, brighton says...
2:42pm Mon 28 Apr 08

i hate to be the one to point out the obvious but, brighton as a town gains most of its tourism from stag and hen parties that come down from all over the country, no? especially in the summer. these supposed "5 clubs," (i think its more along the lines of 3) provide the entertainment these parties are looking for, therefore increasing the appeal and wealth of the town. i know that these mp would like to think that its the pier and perhaps some of the historical aspects, but i like to think more honestly. but then i suppose if we get rid of these clubs we can get the money else where, such as increasing the already ridiculous prices of parking, or maybe our council tax. i suggest those who oppose this type of industry actually experience it for themselves beofore making judgements, because if they are looking to lower violent and sex related crimes they migh as well close the nightclubs while they are at it. i wonder if they will?

Your sayYourArgus

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE The Argus account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?

Sponsored Links


Local Services


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »