TEXT your pictures, videos and messages to 80360. Start your message with SUPIC or email your tip-offs »
3:18pm Monday 28th January 2008
Plans to demolish a landmark building and replace it with flats and a GP surgery have been attacked by leading conservation groups.
English Heritage and the Victorian Society have criticised the proposals for the former Royal Alexandra children's hospital in Dyke Road, Brighton.
The scheme will see the Victorian structure torn down and replaced by more than 150 flats - 40 per cent of which would be "affordable homes" - a GP surgery with a pharmacy and a community green for public use.
But English Heritage, which gives historic buildings listed status, and the Victorian Society, which campaigns for the preservation of Victorian and Edwardian structures, have objected to the planning application.
In a letter to Brighton and Hove City Council, English Heritage warned the scheme would have an 'adverse effect' on the area and said the buildings were 'rather monolithic'.
English Heritage turned down a bid to have the buildings listed because of its many changes but believes the former hospital remains an important landmark.
Graham Steaggles, historic areas advisor, wrote: "The Royal Alexandra Hospital for Sick Children retains its impressive Queen Anne revival 1881 main facade.
"There have, however, been later additions and changes that compromise its overall architectural interest."
The Victorian Society has called for the building not to be knocked down.
Heliose Brown, conservation adviser for the society, said: "The Royal Alexandra Hospital is an attractive and well built part of the history of this area.
"It is still in fair condition and lends itself well to adaptation and so offers the possibility of a potentially exciting conversion project.
"The proposed replacement residential blocks are not of sufficiently remarkable design to warrant the destruction and waste of this historic building.
"The society strongly recommends that permission is not granted for its demolition."
A spokeswoman for developers Taylor Wimpey said: "Taylor Wimpey is continuing discussions on the design with Brighton and Hove City Council as part of the planning application process."
The building company has continued to argue that converting the building is not viable.
The firm said that even a partial conversion would mean forgoing a doctors' surgery and energy efficiency.
Roger Amerena, chairman of the Montpelier and Clifton Hill Association, is calling for a meeting with the council and developers to look again at the plans.
He said: "Not all the buildings can be retained but some should be.
"We would like a meaningful discussion between the community and the developers."
The Montpelier Surgery in Victoria Road has been identified as the GP practice that would move to the new development, as it will have to leave its current site in the next few years.
John Oliver, practice manager, said more than 1,700 people had signed a petition in support of the surgery moving and has urged people to write to the planning committee.
The planning application is still open to consultation and is likely to be discussed in March.
Tell us what you think about the proposals for the former Royal Alex below.
Robert, Brighton says...
3:37pm Mon 28 Jan 08
GREYRUN, HOVE says...
3:38pm Mon 28 Jan 08
Big Cheese, Peacehaven says...
3:52pm Mon 28 Jan 08
David, Hove says...
3:54pm Mon 28 Jan 08
Albert, Falmer says...
4:04pm Mon 28 Jan 08
Matt Spoors, hove says...
4:08pm Mon 28 Jan 08
Jacob, Brighton says...
4:36pm Mon 28 Jan 08
norm, hove says...
4:39pm Mon 28 Jan 08
Labour Councillor, Town Hall says...
4:45pm Mon 28 Jan 08
Stroller wrote:What a predictable line from this secret Labour councillor online. And yet another Labour fallacy. This is why Labour can't be trusted : they tell lies as easily as you or I breathe fresh air.
The Tories have no interest in architecture. They have shown that since they got in. They are "working with" Wimpey to get a dreary design through. It will lose them Pavilion at the General Election.
Barry, Walsingham Road says...
5:23pm Mon 28 Jan 08
sam, brighton says...
5:30pm Mon 28 Jan 08
Clive Graham, Seven Dials says...
7:26pm Mon 28 Jan 08
Johny Dean, Montpelier Crescent says...
7:30pm Mon 28 Jan 08
markc, hove says...
7:56pm Mon 28 Jan 08
hem, says...
8:15pm Mon 28 Jan 08
Terry, Brighton central says...
8:24pm Mon 28 Jan 08
Flat Foot Soozie, Brunswick Square says...
9:58pm Mon 28 Jan 08
Dee, Brighton says...
11:07pm Mon 28 Jan 08
Labour Councillor wrote:What a pompous Tory tw*t! Have plenty of money and no worries do we? And as for Labour not to be trusted, how about Margaret Thatcher for the biggest bloody liar of the lot?! Our country has never recovered, and is never likely to, from the useless, pathetic "leadership" of that awful woman. She brought us to her knees and all the Tories still sing her praises! Who's the "fool" and the "scum" there then?!!!!
Stroller wrote: The Tories have no interest in architecture. They have shown that since they got in. They are \"working with\" Wimpey to get a dreary design through. It will lose them Pavilion at the General Election.What a predictable line from this secret Labour councillor online. And yet another Labour fallacy. This is why Labour can\'t be trusted : they tell lies as easily as you or I breathe fresh air. Everyone knows that people like er...\"Stroller\" are just angst ridden scum vengeful at other people who they think are better off and know nothing about culture or architecture. \"Stroller\" knows the outcome of the development is almost inevitable but uses the story for anti-Tory mileage all the same. Pathetic. Labour scum go back your smoke-filled working mens clubs of the 1950s with your nylon shirts and greasy kipper ties. You fool nobody.
Scummer, Brighton says...
11:46pm Mon 28 Jan 08
Dennis, Brighton says...
2:59am Tue 29 Jan 08
P. Wilkinson, Brighton says...
8:51am Tue 29 Jan 08
Sue Palmer, Wish says...
10:03am Tue 29 Jan 08
Roy Pennington, says...
10:03am Tue 29 Jan 08
The building company has continued to argue that converting the building is not viable.
The firm said that even a partial conversion would mean forgoing a doctors' surgery and energy efficiency.
littlemiss, sussex says...
10:06am Tue 29 Jan 08
Louis, Brighton says...
10:13am Tue 29 Jan 08
Roy, says...
10:31am Tue 29 Jan 08
PS, hove says...
10:47am Tue 29 Jan 08
Roger Tilbury, Worthing says...
11:08am Tue 29 Jan 08
Lou, Brighton says...
11:39am Tue 29 Jan 08
Hell's Bells, Ventnor Villas, Hove says...
12:34pm Tue 29 Jan 08
Paul, Conservation area says...
8:19pm Tue 29 Jan 08
Roy Pennington wrote:
The building company has continued to argue that converting the building is not viable. The firm said that even a partial conversion would mean forgoing a doctors' surgery and energy efficiency.On balance, the community needs a brand new surgery rather than a building kept in aspic.
Wendy McAngus, Brighton says...
1:13pm Wed 30 Jan 08
Hilary, Bucks says...
8:38pm Tue 5 Feb 08
Add your comment
Register for a FREE The Argus account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.
Please register now or sign in below to continue.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for Jobs in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley and more...
Search Now »
Find the right person in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley...
Search Now »
Search for Homes in Brighton, Worthing, Hove, Lewes...
Search Now »
Search for Cars in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley...
Search Now »
Stroller, Hove says...
3:36pm Mon 28 Jan 08