News RSS Feed


Activist loses battle with Gordon Brown

1:12pm Thursday 7th February 2008

comment Comments (19)   Have your say »

By Damien Pearse »

A former Labour Party activist was today defeated in his "David v Goliath" legal challenge with the Government over its refusal to grant a referendum on the European Union Lisbon Treaty.

A judge struck out a case brought by UK Independence Party (Ukip) parliamentary hopeful Stuart Bower in which he accused Prime Minister Gordon Brown of a breach of contract.

Ahead of the hearing, Mr Bower argued that the Lisbon Treaty, signed by 27 member states of the EU in December, is effectively the same as the European Constitution on which the Government promised a referendum at the last General Election.

James Fenton, representing Mr Bower at Brighton County Court, said a Labour manifesto pledge in 2005 created a "legitimate expectation" that a referendum would be held.

In arguing that Mr Bower's case should proceed, Mr Fenton also said the Government had usurped the Crown's authority by signing the Lisbon Treaty, raising what he called fundamental constitutional questions.

He said: "It is quite clear that the Government cannot do more than what the Crown can do, so whatever the limitations apply to the Crown apply also to Parliament.

"The effect of the Lisbon Treaty is to transfer governance of this country to a body that does not owe allegiance to the Monarch and is not accountable to the people of this country."

However, the Government quoted authority which said that an alleged failure to fulfil a manifesto promise fell outside the laws under which the claim was being brought.

Cecilia Ivimy, for the Government, said: "A manifesto promise is incapable of giving rise to a legally binding contract with the electorate. It is a point which is so obvious that I don't want to labour it."

Responding to claims that the Government usurped the Crown, she added that it was not a judicial issue and that the Government was exercising the Crown's powers.


Your Say YourArgus

Avril King, Poole, Dorset says...
1:23pm Thu 7 Feb 08

Well, what a surprise.
A court actually confirming that you should believe a word a politician says.
How well suited ours all are for the gravy train.

Avril King, Poole says...
1:26pm Thu 7 Feb 08

Oops! That should have read NOT believe!

Number Six, Sompting says...
1:35pm Thu 7 Feb 08

What a waste of time and effort this was.

If we were to sue every time the government broke it's manifesto commitment then the Courts would be overwhelmed.

Having said that, I agree with he basic point but Flash Gordon will never hold a referndum on something he could well lose

Angryman, hard at work says...
1:41pm Thu 7 Feb 08

We need a revolution and these people like Brown and his big business buddies in Europe and beyond have been warned...

The Escapist, Empire City says...
1:51pm Thu 7 Feb 08

What a surprise. This idiot should charged with wasting the courts time.

MW, Brighton says...
2:42pm Thu 7 Feb 08

The escapist and number six are stupid langers. I wouldn't vote UKIP but Stuart Bower did a good job bringing this matter to court and exposing the langer supreme Gordon Brown for the lying leftie langer that he is. Langer is such a nice word.

Lawyer, Brighton says...
2:54pm Thu 7 Feb 08

What you bunch of total numpties don't (and probably won't ever) understand is that there is, as the core of this a very important issue with regard to Consitutional and Administrative UK law that was being out.

Cecilia Ivimy, for the Government, said: "A manifesto promise is incapable of giving rise to a legally binding contract with the electorate. It is a point which is so obvious that I don't want to labour it."

Cecilia Ivimy, for the Government, said: "A manifesto promise is incapable of giving rise to a legally binding contract with the electorate. It is a point which is so obvious that I don't want to labour it."

Cecilia Ivimy, for the Government, said: "A manifesto promise is incapable of giving rise to a legally binding contract with the electorate. It is a point which is so obvious that I don't want to labour it."

You've now got a Government lawyer confirming totally on the record that Party Manifestos are not worth the paper they are written on and any member of public that believes them verbatim is a sucker.

The guy that initiated this case is an absolute genius and deserves a medal.

You say there was no win. I say quite the contrary. What has been won is something far far more valuable....

Think it over...

Number Six, Sompting says...
2:56pm Thu 7 Feb 08

MW wrote:
The escapist and number six are stupid langers. I wouldn't vote UKIP but Stuart Bower did a good job bringing this matter to court and exposing the langer supreme Gordon Brown for the lying leftie langer that he is. Langer is such a nice word.
Langer? I'm sorry but I only speak English, not gibberish.

Clearly the concept of logic has yet to arrive on your home planet. How can you expose the leader of the Labour Party as a leftie when being a leftie is exactly what Brown is meant to be and proud of it.

Perhaps I need to make my point more obvious. I agree with Bower's point entirely. I just think it was a silly waste of time and resources to go to Court with a case that even I can see is a non-starter. The only thing that this has achieved is even wealthier lawyers. Then again, maybe you like the idea of lawyers getting wealthier


Here, There says...
3:09pm Thu 7 Feb 08

I think it was a good idea as it now is documented that manifestos are a bunch of lies and should NOT be taken seriously when considering one's votes in elections, they are not promises but hot air and mean NOTHING, this court case has documented that and it is in writing what most of us belived...

Foxtrot Oscar, Brighton says...
3:10pm Thu 7 Feb 08

Stuart Bower deserves a medal for exposing Brown. This will F88K Up the Labour party for years. We now know that Labour's manifesto was nothing more than a device designed with the explicit intention of deceiving the electorate for the express purpose of gaining a democratic mandate on a false prospectus. In short it was a fraud. By the way I know what langer means - Gordon Brown and escapist definetly langers but number six is only a borderline langer but he has great langer potential.

b, Brighton says...
3:16pm Thu 7 Feb 08

Angryman wrote:
We need a revolution and these people like Brown and his big business buddies in Europe and beyond have been warned...
Agree 100%! It is about time that they way things in Govt. are done is changed. They ARE the servants of the people, for this they are highly paid and get a very good Pension. It should have been voted on by the people.

JC, Steyning says...
5:35pm Thu 7 Feb 08

This case reinforces the fact that this present goverment of crooks and liers still ride roughshod over us mere voters but this case may well resonate on. What angrman has said is spot on. We need a revolution to kick out these traitors within our midst, remove their snouts from the many troughs and give them all a one way ticket to Afghanistan!

Paul, Worthing says...
5:41pm Thu 7 Feb 08

JC wrote:
This case reinforces the fact that this present goverment of crooks and liers still ride roughshod over us mere voters but this case may well resonate on. What angrman has said is spot on. We need a revolution to kick out these traitors within our midst, remove their snouts from the many troughs and give them all a one way ticket to Afghanistan!
Haven't the people of Afghanistan got enough to contend with?

It would be nice to make election manifestos leaglly enforceable. Perhaps then a bit more thought might go into them, rather than headline-grabbing, crowd-pleasing guff.

(Yeah, I know, flap flap flap flap OINK flap flap flap)

devils advocate, says...
7:49pm Thu 7 Feb 08

No one was ever going to beat old Joe (Brown) Stalin now were they, least of all UKIP, who were, after all the establishments ploy to redirecting public anger from joining the BNP. We have lost the fight on Europe and against Communism because we were too apathetic to back those who had warned us of the threats to our liberties that were coming, so we deserve all that is happening. Perhaps other, more aware and less lazy countries can learn from our mistake.

The good life, Malagar Spain says...
9:30pm Thu 7 Feb 08

When this rotten lot came to power,i moved to Spain. For those of you that voted for them,"PUT UP WITH THEM" and for those that did not, theirs still plenty of room in this unspoiled country.

Bill, says...
11:16pm Thu 7 Feb 08

Christ, there are some dim comments here tonight. What the lawyer said was that manifestoes are not a CONTRACT, meaning that it's not a promise you can enforce in law. She didn't say politicians always lie.

We do occasionally have these things called elections, which are very useful if you don't think politicians have lived up to their promises.

Lancelot, Hove says...
3:34am Fri 8 Feb 08

What do you expect with a Scottish tightwad **** like
charisma Brown in charge ? Hadrian has a lot to answer for

stephen burt, Gloucester says...
7:30am Sat 9 Feb 08

Bill wrote:
Christ, there are some dim comments here tonight. What the lawyer said was that manifestoes are not a CONTRACT, meaning that it\'s not a promise you can enforce in law. She didn\'t say politicians always lie. We do occasionally have these things called elections, which are very useful if you don\'t think politicians have lived up to their promises.
BUT, if a prospective candidate promises something in order to win votes, doesn’t that mean something? Doesn’t that person at the very least have some conscious of responsibility to actual do what he was voted in for? MP’s are called “The Right Honourable”!! Isn’t this supposed to mean something? If a British Court is now telling us that we are not to believe in a Parties Manifesto and that they are just meaningless words – then what is the point? Why have Politicians at all? Why are we paying their salaries? Why not disband Parliament altogether and save millions of our tax money and let the EU take over completely; after all, we pay their salaries as well, so why pay twice?

Ann, West Midlands says...
11:21pm Sun 10 Feb 08

Perhaps it is a good job that there will be no more General elections in this Country when the Lisbon Treaty is ratified because there will be no requirement for a pretend British Government any more. I realised this when I heard the Conservatives were promising a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty even after if had been ratified. What a joke, they had me going for a minute there. However, there is a bright side. Think of the money we will save in paying their wages and vast expenses-all a thing of the past.

Your sayYourArgus

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE The Argus account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?

Sponsored Links


Local Services


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »