TEXT your pictures, videos and messages to 80360. Start your message with SUPIC or email your tip-offs »
1:12pm Thursday 7th February 2008
A former Labour Party activist was today defeated in his "David v Goliath" legal challenge with the Government over its refusal to grant a referendum on the European Union Lisbon Treaty.
A judge struck out a case brought by UK Independence Party (Ukip) parliamentary hopeful Stuart Bower in which he accused Prime Minister Gordon Brown of a breach of contract.
Ahead of the hearing, Mr Bower argued that the Lisbon Treaty, signed by 27 member states of the EU in December, is effectively the same as the European Constitution on which the Government promised a referendum at the last General Election.
James Fenton, representing Mr Bower at Brighton County Court, said a Labour manifesto pledge in 2005 created a "legitimate expectation" that a referendum would be held.
In arguing that Mr Bower's case should proceed, Mr Fenton also said the Government had usurped the Crown's authority by signing the Lisbon Treaty, raising what he called fundamental constitutional questions.
He said: "It is quite clear that the Government cannot do more than what the Crown can do, so whatever the limitations apply to the Crown apply also to Parliament.
"The effect of the Lisbon Treaty is to transfer governance of this country to a body that does not owe allegiance to the Monarch and is not accountable to the people of this country."
However, the Government quoted authority which said that an alleged failure to fulfil a manifesto promise fell outside the laws under which the claim was being brought.
Cecilia Ivimy, for the Government, said: "A manifesto promise is incapable of giving rise to a legally binding contract with the electorate. It is a point which is so obvious that I don't want to labour it."
Responding to claims that the Government usurped the Crown, she added that it was not a judicial issue and that the Government was exercising the Crown's powers.
Avril King, Poole says...
1:26pm Thu 7 Feb 08
Number Six, Sompting says...
1:35pm Thu 7 Feb 08
Angryman, hard at work says...
1:41pm Thu 7 Feb 08
The Escapist, Empire City says...
1:51pm Thu 7 Feb 08
MW, Brighton says...
2:42pm Thu 7 Feb 08
Lawyer, Brighton says...
2:54pm Thu 7 Feb 08
Number Six, Sompting says...
2:56pm Thu 7 Feb 08
MW wrote:Langer? I'm sorry but I only speak English, not gibberish.
The escapist and number six are stupid langers. I wouldn't vote UKIP but Stuart Bower did a good job bringing this matter to court and exposing the langer supreme Gordon Brown for the lying leftie langer that he is. Langer is such a nice word.
Here, There says...
3:09pm Thu 7 Feb 08
Foxtrot Oscar, Brighton says...
3:10pm Thu 7 Feb 08
b, Brighton says...
3:16pm Thu 7 Feb 08
Angryman wrote:Agree 100%! It is about time that they way things in Govt. are done is changed. They ARE the servants of the people, for this they are highly paid and get a very good Pension. It should have been voted on by the people.
We need a revolution and these people like Brown and his big business buddies in Europe and beyond have been warned...
JC, Steyning says...
5:35pm Thu 7 Feb 08
Paul, Worthing says...
5:41pm Thu 7 Feb 08
JC wrote:Haven't the people of Afghanistan got enough to contend with?
This case reinforces the fact that this present goverment of crooks and liers still ride roughshod over us mere voters but this case may well resonate on. What angrman has said is spot on. We need a revolution to kick out these traitors within our midst, remove their snouts from the many troughs and give them all a one way ticket to Afghanistan!
devils advocate, says...
7:49pm Thu 7 Feb 08
The good life, Malagar Spain says...
9:30pm Thu 7 Feb 08
Bill, says...
11:16pm Thu 7 Feb 08
Lancelot, Hove says...
3:34am Fri 8 Feb 08
stephen burt, Gloucester says...
7:30am Sat 9 Feb 08
Bill wrote:BUT, if a prospective candidate promises something in order to win votes, doesnt that mean something? Doesnt that person at the very least have some conscious of responsibility to actual do what he was voted in for? MPs are called The Right Honourable!! Isnt this supposed to mean something? If a British Court is now telling us that we are not to believe in a Parties Manifesto and that they are just meaningless words then what is the point? Why have Politicians at all? Why are we paying their salaries? Why not disband Parliament altogether and save millions of our tax money and let the EU take over completely; after all, we pay their salaries as well, so why pay twice?
Christ, there are some dim comments here tonight. What the lawyer said was that manifestoes are not a CONTRACT, meaning that it\'s not a promise you can enforce in law. She didn\'t say politicians always lie. We do occasionally have these things called elections, which are very useful if you don\'t think politicians have lived up to their promises.
Ann, West Midlands says...
11:21pm Sun 10 Feb 08
Add your comment
Register for a FREE The Argus account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.
Please register now or sign in below to continue.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for Jobs in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley and more...
Search Now »
Find the right person in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley...
Search Now »
Search for Homes in Brighton, Worthing, Hove, Lewes...
Search Now »
Search for Cars in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley...
Search Now »
Avril King, Poole, Dorset says...
1:23pm Thu 7 Feb 08
A court actually confirming that you should believe a word a politician says.
How well suited ours all are for the gravy train.