Business leader says Brighton Marina plan is key for jobs and homes

Tony Mernagh Tony Mernagh

A business leader has urged a planning inspector to grant permission to a complex of 1,300 homes for the good of Brighton and Hove's economy.

Tony Mernagh, chief executive of Brighton and Hove Economic Partnership, spoke yesterday at the end of the fourth week of the inquiry into plans for the controversial development at Brighton Marina.

He said the proposed seven towers blocks, shops and offices were key to providing jobs and homes badly needed in the city.

Mr Mernagh said Brighton and Hove needed to start fulfilling its role as the main driver in the economic "diamond" on the Sussex Coast.

He said: "To put it bluntly, this diamond needs to get its act together and start delivering jobs and homes for its population.

"And it can no longer afford the glacial pace that took two decades to deliver the New England Quarter at the Station Goodsyard or the three decades to deliver the new library in Jubilee Street."

Mr Mernagh was called as a witness at the five week long inquiry into the plans.

Planning inspector Martin Pike has been called in to reconsider the proposals after Explore Living, the developers behind the plans, appealled against Brighton and Hove City Council's decision to reject them last December.

At the conclusion of the public inquiry at the East Wing of the Brighton Centre he will compile a report to pass to Communities Secretary John Denham for a final decision. It is expected in March at the earliest.

After presenting his views yesterday Mr Mernagh was cross-examined by residents. Under questioning he conceded he should not have commented on the architecture of the marina, which he described as brutal, and that comments suggesting it should be attracting more than three million visitors a year were not based on comparisons with other marinas.

Mr Mernagh maintained developing the marina for the benefit of the city was the overriding priority.

He said: "It's really a case of ask not what the marina can do for you as what the marina can do for the city."

On Thursday John Gummer MP, the former environment secretary, also spoke in support of the scheme, proposed for a site at the west side of the marina, where Asda, McDonald's and a petrol station currently stand.

Comments(8)

saveHOVE says...
3:10pm Sat 5 Dec 09

It would be of interest to the public to know just how much of his own money Mr. Mernagh has ever invested in any of the inappropriate and greed-driven overdevelopments he so routinely praises and begs for.

His lack of interest in the honesty or legality of any of the planning material that is ultimately rejected when found out is disturbing.

Well done saveBrighton for exposing to the Public Inquiry and extracting the confession about it from Richard Coleman (Argus reported) that its computer-generated images were not fit for purpose as reliable indicators of what was proposed - lies in other words.

Why does Mernagh always just button-push support for dross in the name of growth? If we are offered dross by dross it is because dross is supporting it.

Development at the Marina has been appalling and its purpose as a Marina is endlessly compromised by every new offer.

Only the hillstairs down from the clifftop deserve to be retained from the application being considered by the Inquiry. The rest is insanity.



lumen says...
4:19pm Sat 5 Dec 09

I was at the inquiry when Mr Mernagh was cross-examined. Mr Mernagh admitted that he had no qualifications in economics, not even a GCSE, and under some ingenious questioning from Mr Simpson from savebrighton he was forced to agree that just about every statistic he had quoted was incorrect. He admitted he hadn't consulted a single Marina business so I assume he was speaking for himself.

It's clear to me that the proposed massive tower-block overdevelopment would be the kiss of death to the marina, for businesses and residents alike.

If Mr Mernagh wants to support proposals like this he really should do so on the basis of honest facts, and if there are no honest facts to back up what he says, wouldn't it be best for him to stay silent?

sussexone says...
8:24pm Sat 5 Dec 09

What a lot of fuss about nothing, even if it does get permission, it won't get built, nothing does in this backwater.

The Nimbys are always the most vocal, it's about time a public vote was held on things like the Marina, Black Rock, etc, etc.

I'd hazard a guess that most people would support them, not the Nimbys of course who want the rotten stinky marina cesspit to remain as it is.

I always wash my feet on the way out of there! Lol.

Darling2 says...
1:44am Sun 6 Dec 09

Strange place the Marina. Mr Mernagh is not wrong about its 'brutal' architecture that's for sure.

lumen says...
6:36am Sun 6 Dec 09

Something that baffles me about Mr Chiles's reporting is the way it makes no mention of the most dramatic thing about Mr Mernagh's cross-examination (the way he was forced to admit that nearly all his 'facts' were wrong). It seems to go along with the Argus's usual uncritical adulation of developers and their cronies, and it makes me wonder whether Mr Chiles had really been at the inquiry - or was he at home writing his article when Mr Mernagh was speaking?

salty_pete says...
8:36am Mon 7 Dec 09

Wouldn't it be better to encourage light industry into the town first, to soak up all the unemployed, rather than create homes for more unemployed to live in ? What the town (sorry I still can't refer to it as a city) needs is more employment opportunities .... not housing development.

s_james says...
8:29am Mon 14 Dec 09

salty_pete wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to encourage light industry into the town first, to soak up all the unemployed, rather than create homes for more unemployed to live in ? What the town (sorry I still can't refer to it as a city) needs is more employment opportunities .... not housing development.
As a first time buyer priced out of the city by the high cost of property, I would disagree. Its clear to me there is a huge shortage of homes in Brighton which is inflating the prices of those which are there. Those who object to schemes such as this and the Prince Albert consider the serious inplications for a large number of residents that the lack of affordable properties in this city is having. The Tory Councillors who rejected this scheme certainly don't care. It was approved by the planners, who are qualified and professional in the field of planning- let them get on with their job

Living in the real world says...
12:30pm Sun 20 Dec 09

Many things spring to mind, how are these 1600 families going to get in and out of the town bearing in mind it is already nose to tail in this are on a daily basis, where are you going to get 1600 people to live in Whitehawk Docks when there is no work in the area to support them let alone schools, doctors, hospitals and green areas for the children to grow up and play safe in.

Finally who is Mernagh working for and wtah is his agenda if they need to lie to get there way

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree