Brighton and Hove parking review is ‘waste of money’

Brighton and Hove parking review is ‘waste of money’ Brighton and Hove parking review is ‘waste of money’

For motorists in Brighton and Hove, parking problems are nothing new and there are a number of recurring themes.

Among these are:

  • That parking takes place on pavements and grass verges
  • Concern about the cost
  • Pressure of leaving vehicles in areas next to controlled parking zones.

Almost every driver in the city could tell you that these are the main problems.

So the news that initial conclusions from a citywide parking review has thrown up these issues has been met with disbelief.

What has angered opposition councillors further is that this review carried out by consultants is costing up to £25,000.

Brighton and Hove City Council claims the year-long process will give it the most “forensic” look yet at the contentious issue.

This so-called review should stop now before any more money is wasted

Gill Mitchell, Brighton and Hove City Council Labour and Co-operative group leader

Bosses added the review, which was approved six months ago before the controversial new tariffs came into force in April, would lead to improvements across the city.

But Steve Percy, of the People’s Parking Protest, said: “To spend £25,000 to be told exactly what they already know from people like me and other organisations is an utter, complete waste of money.”

Related links

Labour and Co-operative group leader Gill Mitchell said: “The purpose of this parking review has never been made clear but for the Green council to have hired an expensive firm of consultants to tell them what they already know from the many petitions and letters sent in from residents is ludicrous.

“This so-called review should stop now before any more money is wasted and the Greens should get on with consulting residents in areas where parking schemes are being requested.”

Detailed follow-up

As well as the initial findings, an update on the review said more than 100 community groups had been contacted and presentations given to 18 local meetings.

The issues will now be followed up in more detail and letters asking for opinions will be sent out by post.

A similar review was proposed by the previous Conservative administration before last year’s local elections.

Councillor Geoffrey Theobald, leader of the Conservative group of councillors, said he had expected the review to be completed before different parking tariffs were introduced.

He said: “We certainly envisaged then completing it before introducing new bits and pieces.

“It does not make sense at all.”

He said he had also thought the review would look at areas where parking prices could come down, such as near Preston Park station.

Council leader Bill Randall said the consultation is a “genuine opportunity” and more thorough than previous consultations.

He said: “We want to find out how parking is currently working for people in their area.

“We are particularly interested in people’s ideas and suggested solutions to problems they may have with parking in the city.”

Ian Davey, the council’s cabinet member for transport and the public realm, said: “We are reviewing the effectiveness and impact of current parking schemes on the city with the aim of improving the management of parking for the city as a whole.”

What do you think about the £25,000 report?

Tell us by writing to our letters page, emailing letters@theargus.co.uk or leaving a comment below.

More news from The Argus

Daily Echo on Facebook - facebook.com/southerndailyecho Like us on Facebook

Google+ Add us to your circles on Google+

Comments(11)

bug eye says...
7:22pm Thu 10 May 12

simple cpz the whole city and give council tax paying residents with eco cars (congestion charge free) a permit to allow free parking off peak 10 - 3 and after 630 around the city and the use of bus lanes. bring back free parking after 630 and on sundays for all. introduce reasonable parking tariffs that residents and visitors will be happy to pay and not avoid. deal with traveller vans. important to cpz the green wards where all the students have 2 or 3 old bangers per household.

mimseycal says...
8:56pm Thu 10 May 12

You need a consultant to investigate what is obvious to anyone with a modicum of sense?

I often sit in my car at the bottom of my road for up to 2 hours waiting for a space because our road is filled with hospital visitors/workers who will not pay the high charges there.

Idontbelieveit1948 says...
9:12pm Thu 10 May 12

As ever Greens do things backwards i.e up parking charges then consult - presumably they are hoping to up the charges even more after this !

Is councillor Randall real when saying “We are particularly interested in people’s ideas and suggested solutions to problems they may have with parking in the city.” They weren't interested until the Trader, Visitor and Resident furore kicked off - as usual with the Greens

Idontbelieveit1948 says...
9:12pm Thu 10 May 12

As ever Greens do things backwards i.e up parking charges then consult - presumably they are hoping to up the charges even more after this !

Is councillor Randall real when saying “We are particularly interested in people’s ideas and suggested solutions to problems they may have with parking in the city.” They weren't interested until the Trader, Visitor and Resident furore kicked off - as usual with the Greens

Idontbelieveit1948 says...
9:14pm Thu 10 May 12

Idontbelieveit1948 wrote:
As ever Greens do things backwards i.e up parking charges then consult - presumably they are hoping to up the charges even more after this !

Is councillor Randall real when saying “We are particularly interested in people’s ideas and suggested solutions to problems they may have with parking in the city.” They weren't interested until the Trader, Visitor and Resident furore kicked off - as usual with the Greens
To complete what I was saying. As usual with the Greens it is open mouth first and engage brain sometime later !

Hove Actually says...
10:49pm Thu 10 May 12

Lying sacks of horse waste running around spending our money on more bags of horse waste whilst spouting bags of horse waste, but as a taxpayer I don't get a say whoever is in power

wexler53 says...
11:16pm Thu 10 May 12

Like all these consultations, the results are driven by the aims of the researchers - ie, pay money to get the answer you want. With the Greens, decisions are ideologically driven, so reality doesn't come in to the equation. What we need is common sense, not these idiots, and the sooner they are out, the better.

Pebbles says...
1:14am Fri 11 May 12

I worked on a company once that employed a "consultant"... he told us that we should be looking to save money.... so we did... and sacked him.

fred clause says...
6:27am Fri 11 May 12

Pebbles wrote:
I worked on a company once that employed a "consultant"... he told us that we should be looking to save money.... so we did... and sacked him.
now if only we could do that to these brain dead Green nimbys

s&k says...
9:41am Fri 11 May 12

bug eye wrote:
simple cpz the whole city and give council tax paying residents with eco cars (congestion charge free) a permit to allow free parking off peak 10 - 3 and after 630 around the city and the use of bus lanes. bring back free parking after 630 and on sundays for all. introduce reasonable parking tariffs that residents and visitors will be happy to pay and not avoid. deal with traveller vans. important to cpz the green wards where all the students have 2 or 3 old bangers per household.
Agree!

Mark63 says...
12:25pm Fri 11 May 12

Idiots!
What they need to do is arrange an almost compulsory (but effcient and preofessional) park and ride with huge signes on the A23 and A27 noting 'Park and Ride £5 a day - or you could pay £25 in the City' - be upfront... people must be stunned when they visit and I'm sure they won;t come back again. Even as a local, I've started shopping elsewhere - parking here is criminally priced.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree