'We don't want any more Sainsbury's stores', say Brighton campaigners (From The Argus)
Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
'We don't want any more Sainsbury's stores', say Brighton campaigners
4:30pm Saturday 26th March 2011 in News By James Wallin
Campaigners are urging council bosses to write to Sainsbury’s to urge the company not to open any more stores in Brighton and Hove.
The council’s chief executive has been asked to pen a letter to the supermarket giant to say residents do not want another store in the city.
It is one of the suggestions to be sent to the council’s cabinet as part of a 1,421-strong petition called Keep Brighton Unique.
The call to arms against high street heavyweights has been prompted by Sainsbury’s plans to move into the former Taj store in St James’s Street – meaning four chain supermarkets on the same street.
The petition calls for more powers to restrict the number of large stores in response to concerns “about Brighton becoming another 'clone town' city, swamped by large chain stores that pose a threat to the unique character of our city”.
At Thursday night’s council meeting it received cross-party support and prompted several additional suggestions, including one from the Green Party that chief executive John Barradell should make the opinions of residents clear to Sainsbury’s.
Read the full story in today's Argus.
Comments(42)
chipmunk77
says...
5:34pm Sat 26 Mar 11
I personally don't mind if another supermarket opens in the old Taj store, it provides jobs, this rubbish they come out with about the unique character of an area, WHAT UTTER ROT, St James Street is a stinky hole in most part with a few great exceptions.
The area that makes Brighton UNIQUE is the Laines (North & South) which are chock-a-block full of small unique shops and long may it continue.
These people should get behind businesses and welcome them to an area, not have a hissy fit just because it doesn't fit in with their particular brand of commercialism.
dhlennon
says...
5:51pm Sat 26 Mar 11
We can't force the site to be taken by florists, etc, the business rates on that building must be massive.
We still have North Laine for our quirky and interesting shops. We can keep that quarter financially viable, as a good thing for the City as a whole.
Whether we should subsidise small local businesses elsewhere in the City or not is a moot point. Many of us like a "local shop" and agree with the principle, and would like to support the "local shopkeeper". But we know the honest truth, you go somewhere where you get a can of baked beans 50p cheaper. Practical v Ideal. I would also add many of the seamingly "local" shops are often part of local family chains.
If Sainsbury think it makes sense to have another store there, it means people will probably shop there. If you hate it don't shop there.
In this instance the "usage" hasn't changed (Taj-Sainsbury), so I would suggest it doesn't matter too much personally.
deve
says...
6:20pm Sat 26 Mar 11
Morpheus
says...
6:38pm Sat 26 Mar 11
tengri
says...
7:29pm Sat 26 Mar 11
andyelevator
says...
9:20pm Sat 26 Mar 11
A vocal minority should not always have the right to think they are right just because the silent majority have said nothing.
Since this is a matter of local interest it would interesting to see how many of 1421 signatories live anywhere near the proposed store they are objecting to?
Perhaps these people who object to a supermarket would be better directing their energies to issues that really matter to the local community-unemployme
nt,homelessness for instance-neither of which could be said to be the fault of Sainsburys....
I for one living in Littlehampton would not object to another supermarket moving into my area!!!
ade1200
says...
9:37pm Sat 26 Mar 11
State control of the market is not a good idea. The Chinese and Russians have come to the same conclusion.
CaliforniaGirl
says...
11:07pm Sat 26 Mar 11
NickBrt
says...
12:02am Sun 27 Mar 11
kkj
says...
12:35am Sun 27 Mar 11
chipmunk77 wrote:"The area that makes Brighton UNIQUE is the Laines (North & South) which are chock-a-block full of small unique shops and long may it continue."
What great support, 1,421 people out of around 250,000 in Brighton & Hove, or just over 0.5% of the population, no doubt a significant portion of them being the anti-anything ( just add fox hunting, Capitalism, Barclays, McDonalds, Top Shop, Philip Green, Government Cuts) mob that will sign anything because that's all they do, aprt from when they are all blacked up with balaclavas and spraying paint on shops etc etc.
I personally don't mind if another supermarket opens in the old Taj store, it provides jobs, this rubbish they come out with about the unique character of an area, WHAT UTTER ROT, St James Street is a stinky hole in most part with a few great exceptions.
The area that makes Brighton UNIQUE is the Laines (North & South) which are chock-a-block full of small unique shops and long may it continue.
These people should get behind businesses and welcome them to an area, not have a hissy fit just because it doesn't fit in with their particular brand of commercialism.
As you are undaoubtedly an expert, would you care to tell us where these unique North and South Laines are?
dawind
says...
12:48am Sun 27 Mar 11
chipmunk77 wrote:I note that you seem to have an opinion on everything. I also note that your`re `anti-anties`. Your`re obviuosly not Brighton born or bred or you would`nt come out with such nonsense as " the Laines (North & South)"which, for elucidation, is a marketing ploy invented by estate agents to harmonise their marketing. It could also of course have been created by Brightonians, so as to allow them to spot newbie pretentious counts(sp) who pontificate their right wing rhetoric in our Green and gay friendly muticultural city. But i digress, to sum up I certainly don`t need a national chain setting up in a prime location when the alternative could, with a little bit of encouragment from the council, be so much more attractive.
What great support, 1,421 people out of around 250,000 in Brighton & Hove, or just over 0.5% of the population, no doubt a significant portion of them being the anti-anything ( just add fox hunting, Capitalism, Barclays, McDonalds, Top Shop, Philip Green, Government Cuts) mob that will sign anything because that's all they do, aprt from when they are all blacked up with balaclavas and spraying paint on shops etc etc.
I personally don't mind if another supermarket opens in the old Taj store, it provides jobs, this rubbish they come out with about the unique character of an area, WHAT UTTER ROT, St James Street is a stinky hole in most part with a few great exceptions.
The area that makes Brighton UNIQUE is the Laines (North & South) which are chock-a-block full of small unique shops and long may it continue.
These people should get behind businesses and welcome them to an area, not have a hissy fit just because it doesn't fit in with their particular brand of commercialism.
tengri
says...
12:55am Sun 27 Mar 11
dawind wrote:You don't but given the general success of Sainsburys elsewhere if seems others do. It's the free market and democracy at work. You might not like it but the alternative is much worse.
chipmunk77 wrote:I note that you seem to have an opinion on everything. I also note that your`re `anti-anties`. Your`re obviuosly not Brighton born or bred or you would`nt come out with such nonsense as " the Laines (North & South)"which, for elucidation, is a marketing ploy invented by estate agents to harmonise their marketing. It could also of course have been created by Brightonians, so as to allow them to spot newbie pretentious counts(sp) who pontificate their right wing rhetoric in our Green and gay friendly muticultural city. But i digress, to sum up I certainly don`t need a national chain setting up in a prime location when the alternative could, with a little bit of encouragment from the council, be so much more attractive.
What great support, 1,421 people out of around 250,000 in Brighton & Hove, or just over 0.5% of the population, no doubt a significant portion of them being the anti-anything ( just add fox hunting, Capitalism, Barclays, McDonalds, Top Shop, Philip Green, Government Cuts) mob that will sign anything because that's all they do, aprt from when they are all blacked up with balaclavas and spraying paint on shops etc etc.
I personally don't mind if another supermarket opens in the old Taj store, it provides jobs, this rubbish they come out with about the unique character of an area, WHAT UTTER ROT, St James Street is a stinky hole in most part with a few great exceptions.
The area that makes Brighton UNIQUE is the Laines (North & South) which are chock-a-block full of small unique shops and long may it continue.
These people should get behind businesses and welcome them to an area, not have a hissy fit just because it doesn't fit in with their particular brand of commercialism.
BTW, to save you making embarrassing assumptions I am not only Brighton born and bred but have an independent high street business in the town too.
pun master
says...
9:09am Sun 27 Mar 11
dawind wrote:...and you have a strange apostrophe on your computer....
chipmunk77 wrote:I note that you seem to have an opinion on everything. I also note that your`re `anti-anties`. Your`re obviuosly not Brighton born or bred or you would`nt come out with such nonsense as " the Laines (North & South)"which, for elucidation, is a marketing ploy invented by estate agents to harmonise their marketing. It could also of course have been created by Brightonians, so as to allow them to spot newbie pretentious counts(sp) who pontificate their right wing rhetoric in our Green and gay friendly muticultural city. But i digress, to sum up I certainly don`t need a national chain setting up in a prime location when the alternative could, with a little bit of encouragment from the council, be so much more attractive.
What great support, 1,421 people out of around 250,000 in Brighton & Hove, or just over 0.5% of the population, no doubt a significant portion of them being the anti-anything ( just add fox hunting, Capitalism, Barclays, McDonalds, Top Shop, Philip Green, Government Cuts) mob that will sign anything because that's all they do, aprt from when they are all blacked up with balaclavas and spraying paint on shops etc etc.
I personally don't mind if another supermarket opens in the old Taj store, it provides jobs, this rubbish they come out with about the unique character of an area, WHAT UTTER ROT, St James Street is a stinky hole in most part with a few great exceptions.
The area that makes Brighton UNIQUE is the Laines (North & South) which are chock-a-block full of small unique shops and long may it continue.
These people should get behind businesses and welcome them to an area, not have a hissy fit just because it doesn't fit in with their particular brand of commercialism.
dawind
says...
12:07pm Sun 27 Mar 11
tengri wrote:Your mention of "the success" of Sainsburys baffles me. It certainly doesn`t feel like success if your`re an independent butcher, baker or candlestickmaker. However if you were a shareholder you wouldn`t give two figs to the destruction of family run firms who spend their cash in the locality of their business. So the term "success" is relative. As to making "embarrassing assumptions" you state; "It's the free market and democracy at work. You might not like it..."
dawind wrote:You don't but given the general success of Sainsburys elsewhere if seems others do. It's the free market and democracy at work. You might not like it but the alternative is much worse.
chipmunk77 wrote:I note that you seem to have an opinion on everything. I also note that your`re `anti-anties`. Your`re obviuosly not Brighton born or bred or you would`nt come out with such nonsense as " the Laines (North & South)"which, for elucidation, is a marketing ploy invented by estate agents to harmonise their marketing. It could also of course have been created by Brightonians, so as to allow them to spot newbie pretentious counts(sp) who pontificate their right wing rhetoric in our Green and gay friendly muticultural city. But i digress, to sum up I certainly don`t need a national chain setting up in a prime location when the alternative could, with a little bit of encouragment from the council, be so much more attractive.
What great support, 1,421 people out of around 250,000 in Brighton & Hove, or just over 0.5% of the population, no doubt a significant portion of them being the anti-anything ( just add fox hunting, Capitalism, Barclays, McDonalds, Top Shop, Philip Green, Government Cuts) mob that will sign anything because that's all they do, aprt from when they are all blacked up with balaclavas and spraying paint on shops etc etc.
I personally don't mind if another supermarket opens in the old Taj store, it provides jobs, this rubbish they come out with about the unique character of an area, WHAT UTTER ROT, St James Street is a stinky hole in most part with a few great exceptions.
The area that makes Brighton UNIQUE is the Laines (North & South) which are chock-a-block full of small unique shops and long may it continue.
These people should get behind businesses and welcome them to an area, not have a hissy fit just because it doesn't fit in with their particular brand of commercialism.
BTW, to save you making embarrassing assumptions I am not only Brighton born and bred but have an independent high street business in the town too.
Enough said!
You then continue "but the alternive is much worse." What a strange embarrassing assumption to make. Do you truly believe that unaccountable private power, which is under no public control, what they call minimizing the state and transferring the decision making to unaccountable private interests which, of course, is not helpful to human beings or to democracy or, for that matter, to the markets; is better than building constructive alternitives.
tengri
says...
12:10pm Sun 27 Mar 11
cheezburger
says...
12:42pm Sun 27 Mar 11
steveP2009
says...
12:43pm Sun 27 Mar 11
tengri
says...
12:50pm Sun 27 Mar 11
steveP2009
says...
1:00pm Sun 27 Mar 11
And you don't have to be so patronising.
tengri
says...
1:13pm Sun 27 Mar 11
steveP2009 wrote:Because you seem to be struggling with the very basic concept of a free market economy...
Taj was always busy when I went in there and they closed because of difficulty with the parent company. I do not believe it closed becuase the shop wasn't making profit.
And you don't have to be so patronising.
Taj expanded too fast. They should have consolidated then expanded. If they were busy then a market exists for their products and a more financially competent competitor will most likely open elsewhere, and will thrive.
steveP2009
says...
1:31pm Sun 27 Mar 11
tengri
says...
2:18pm Sun 27 Mar 11
I'm just saying let the market decide if another Tesco/Sainsburys is needed and not the council. Petitions are great for many things but not for a shop which will soon discover if it is popular or not regardless of any petition.
Granny
says...
3:33pm Sun 27 Mar 11
dawind
says...
4:59pm Sun 27 Mar 11
tengri
says...
5:10pm Sun 27 Mar 11
What I don't agree with is asking the council to get involved in the free market. If they do then perhaps I can get them to stop any of my competitors expanding rather than actually bother to make an effort myself?
dawind
says...
6:35pm Sun 27 Mar 11
tengri wrote:The Councils` job is to make the city attractive to it`s inhabitants, visitors and businesses alike. If that means giving a helping hand to wealth creation then i`m sure the vast majority of people would support it. If you fear your competitors then you ought to up your game. Its called the free market.
I totally agree with attempting to create a market if it doesn't exist. In the case of the failed Taj it appears a market exists for their type of product and is ready and waiting for a shop to serve it, run a little better than Taj of course.
What I don't agree with is asking the council to get involved in the free market. If they do then perhaps I can get them to stop any of my competitors expanding rather than actually bother to make an effort myself?
tengri
says...
6:52pm Sun 27 Mar 11
dawind wrote:Yes I ought to up my game and not ask the council to stop competitors from opening.... Sorry I thought it was a fairly obvious rhetorical question, maybe I have to go back to being patronising again.
tengri wrote:The Councils` job is to make the city attractive to it`s inhabitants, visitors and businesses alike. If that means giving a helping hand to wealth creation then i`m sure the vast majority of people would support it. If you fear your competitors then you ought to up your game. Its called the free market.
I totally agree with attempting to create a market if it doesn't exist. In the case of the failed Taj it appears a market exists for their type of product and is ready and waiting for a shop to serve it, run a little better than Taj of course.
What I don't agree with is asking the council to get involved in the free market. If they do then perhaps I can get them to stop any of my competitors expanding rather than actually bother to make an effort myself?
The suggestion is to get the council to ask Sainsburys not to come to Brighton any more. Since Sainsburys provides jobs and taxes then that must be considered the opposite of wealth creation.
The Advocate
says...
7:04pm Sun 27 Mar 11
If there's something I really need but can't get it in my immediate surrounds, I'll walk to the other side of the city if I have to. Whereas I see people who regularly drive their cars 500 yards just to buy a pizza or a pint of milk and then drive straight back home again. Madness!
I'm all for free choice etc but anyone with a modicum fo sense would understand that four major supermarket chains in a narrow street that is all of 400 yards long is stupendous.
Sometimes it is only the minority that speak up and make their voices heard because others are too scared to upset the status quo.
1,421 signatures in protest to another Sainsbury's is actually quite a strong voice because it demonstrates the feeling of the people who live in the immediate vicinity.
If people are really dumb enough to think that others, who don't even live anywhere near the proposed site, are going to protest against a store that is not going to effect their immediate surroundings they need the heads examined.
ade1200
says...
7:12pm Sun 27 Mar 11
Or busy. Whatever the reason the demand is there. There are also lots of organic shops, veggie shops and ethnic shops in Brighton and surrounding areas. There's a new Chinese supermarket open in Southwick of all places and doing well. I can't see the problem to be honest.
Why we can't just let people shop where they want?
dawind
says...
8:28pm Sun 27 Mar 11
I fear you confuse idealogical doctrine with sound business practice. You say that your a High St trader in Brighton. Good for you and the local people you may or may not employ. My point is that Sainsburys` et al act as a leach on the liquidity of the local economy insofar that the money they take is not recycled into the city, it goes elseware. If you as a local trader feel that this is benificial to your business I fear for your future.
lordenglandofsussex
says...
8:47pm Sun 27 Mar 11
dawind
says...
10:09pm Sun 27 Mar 11
lordenglandofsussex wrote:Yet more moronic noise from those who add nothing to the debate. Shut up and grow up cretin, its sometimes better to remain silent and let people think your stupid, than open your mouth and confirm their suspicions.
More superstores for the civillised thanks and let the left wing layabouts stick to their miserable allotments and back garden veg.
Jesus-Brighton
says...
12:22pm Mon 28 Mar 11
Also, I don't see a problem with the council supporting local businesses, especially during a recession. The reason why local shops prices are so much higher must be because they can't compete with the supermarkets!
GRANDAD
says...
11:40pm Mon 28 Mar 11
Instead of writing letters et al, why don't the council favour the 1421 protesters plus any others they can rustle up by giving them priority and let them all contribute and effectively subsidise and invest by buying shares in a shop of their choice.
When it opens let the shoppers decide if they want to use it. If its a failure then perhaps it will end all these objections to larger stores, if it's a success then it may encourage others to put their hands in their pockets if they want to continue in the same vein.
Everybody seemingly wants a shop, so let market forces decide but give a little help to the anti's first as I am sure Sainsburys can wait and if necessary invest elsewhere.
Jimmy Stewart's Imaginary Rabbit
says...
1:19pm Tue 29 Mar 11
.
The problem is you're a minority aren't you? There aren't enough rich people in Brighton to keep all the twee little independent shops in business. My heart bleeds.
WakeUpYouFreaks!
says...
2:25pm Tue 29 Mar 11
PC mcgary no452
says...
4:11pm Tue 29 Mar 11
The Advocate
says...
6:18pm Tue 29 Mar 11
PC mcgary no452 wrote:What a load of rubbish! How can you possibly ascertain that? It's about the fact there are already enough big supermarkets in a very small street.
Pound to a penny those wittering on about Sainsbury's are mainly those who cannot afford to shop there.
GRANDAD
says...
12:17am Wed 30 Mar 11
Any sign of a cooperative being formed to fund the purchase and run a business of their choosing
Obviously not a good suggestion.
I'm game
says...
12:55pm Wed 30 Mar 11
BriCo
says...
8:48pm Wed 30 Mar 11
"The council’s chief executive has been asked to pen a letter to the supermarket giant to say 1,421 residents do not want another store in the city."
Time the council and Lady Lucas remember the are there to represent the whole community not just small interest groups.
What we need is the Co-op - fair trade products + a stong tradition of starting and supporting the co-operative movement.
superlative says...
5:32pm Sat 26 Mar 11
It could be that a majority of people don't want another supermarket (although Taj was a supermarket anyway), or it could just be a vocal minority. They should hold a proper consultation if they really want to know what local residents think.