News RSS Feed


Workers set to lose fag breaks

2:42pm Tuesday 24th April 2007

comment Comments (15)   Have your say »

By Richard Gurner »

Council workers are set to lose their cigarette breaks as part of a crackdown on smoking.

All staff at Lewes District Council will be banned from nipping off for a quick fag if members at a full council meeting tomorrow agree on suggestions by the cabinet to stub out the practice.

From July all work places will have to be smoke-free from pubs and clubs to council offices.

Lewes District Council aims to go further by banning smoking on all council property, except private residences, introducing the ban one month early and stopping staff members from taking cigarette breaks.

Council leader Ann De Vecchi said: "The thinking behind the suggestions is of course the council, like everybody else, has to conform to the new legislation that's coming into effect in July.

"We think we ought to be leading by example by trying to minimise smoking for people's benefit.

"It's partly that but it's also about fairness and equality. Non-smokers aren't allowed to pop down the shop during work hours for a bar of chocolate and not smoking is something we want to encourage.

"We are going to be offering smoking staff help to quit smoking. It's not just about that you can't do it any longer, we are giving people the opportunity and help not to smoke."

Coun De Vecchi added that there is no party politics involved in the debate and her Liberal Democrat party is free to vote whichever way members wish.

She added that any change in the council's smoking policy would have to undergo staff consultation.

Simon Clark, director of smoker's lobby group Forest, said: "They're not the first council to do it and they are jumping on the anti-smoking bandwagon. Smokers don't have a right to a smoke break but it is poor man management.

"This is a double whammy. Smokers are having to face not just a ban on smoking in every bar and club in the country but they are being told they can't go for a smoke break during the day.

"People are entitled to a break though and if they choose to have a cup of coffee or perhaps make a personal phone call then that's a matter for them and not the council."

He also argued that it was wrong for Lewes District Council to go beyond the legislation by banning smoking breaks and that it was only a small step away from a policy of not employing smokers.

If agreed by full council, the policy would also apply to elected members.

What do you think about the end of the cigarette break? Are you a smoker? Could you cope without having a fag break? Let us know below.


Your Say YourArgus

James, Hove says...
3:05pm Tue 24 Apr 07

"We are going to be offering smoking staff help to quit smoking. It's not just about that you can't do it any longer, we are giving people the opportunity and help not to smoke."

Well you clearly are! You are talking about banning smoking on grounds and banning smoking breaks.

Its another form of discrimination and intolerance towards peoples life choices

Brian, Brighton says...
3:05pm Tue 24 Apr 07

To the anti-smokers it's right and to the smokers it's wrong.
The only REAL thing that bothers me is step-by-step we are all having our freedom and rights, being a democracy, to choose being taken away. The UK is becoming a dictatorship through the back door. What is next? Let's ban drinking because I think it's bad. Let's ban help for drug addicts because it's their own making.
Let's ban everything to save makeing more bans!

Brian, Brighton says...
3:16pm Tue 24 Apr 07

Further to my previous reply....
Please ban people using mobile phones as they do not look where they are going whilst walking with that bit of plastic attached to their heads. And please can all Public Servants (Now that should be changed!)to walk or use a bus

Barry, brighton says...
3:19pm Tue 24 Apr 07

What many people seem to forget is that smoking is an addiction. Surly by preventing staff from nipping outside for a quick **** during the day is going to increase stress levels among the smoking workforce. This is also unfair as it will only affect staff who work inside council premises. This is surly an infringement on peoples human rights.

mike, brighton says...
3:31pm Tue 24 Apr 07

why should i keep working when every half an hour my workmate "nips" out for a quick ****. ten minutes later he comes back in.who ends up the mug there?

Brian, Brighton says...
3:57pm Tue 24 Apr 07

Mike, agree 100% with you, however, does not yet another demise of our rights and freedoms bother you at all?

anon, I think says...
4:23pm Tue 24 Apr 07

I'm more than happy for the council to stop using my council tax to pay workshy staff money to sit around smoking.

Tim, Brighton says...
4:30pm Tue 24 Apr 07

It's hardly a right to have **** breaks every half hour for 10 minutes (like some in my office). I am pretty sure "compulsury **** breaks" are not in people contracts. Health and safety dictates that everyone should have a tiny break from their desks every so often, but not a 10 minute chat outside.

Because they don't allow you to smoke on their premise is their right aimed at promoting a healthy working environment. No human rights have are being infringed. All they are saying is smoke on your own time and own space.

Tim, Brighton says...
4:32pm Tue 24 Apr 07

obviously i meant cigarettes, it's a bit touchy with the word f_a_g

jan, says...
7:19pm Tue 24 Apr 07

It wouldn't hurt to allow smokers their little breaks if they could be taken outside and away from the public eye. As a non smoker I object to smokers having more breaks in total than non smokers - therefore if they want smoke breaks then they should forego their lunch breaks and even things up a little.

Dan, Brighton says...
8:16pm Tue 24 Apr 07

Just take longer toilet breaks.
In fact use the public one up the road, and have a ciggie on the way there and another on the way back.

I know I will.

Rob, Brighton says...
8:22pm Tue 24 Apr 07

It seems to me to be a matter of equality rather than human rights. Either everyone is entitled to the same breaks or they are not. It is obviously grossly unfair for one group, say smokers as an example, to have more breaks than another. Everyone should have the same entitlement, and that's it. My personal view is that it is rather pathetic not to be able to cope without puffing on a cigarette every few minutes, and I speak as a smoker. What happened to self discipline and a consciencious approach to work?

Kelly, Brighton says...
10:47pm Tue 24 Apr 07

People talk about having their human rights taken away by not being able to have cigarette breaks, smoking at work etc, but what about the rights of those, who simply don't want to suffer the effects of taking in second hand smoke which is more harmful to your body then smoking itself. I absolutely agree with Rob in that I don't like it when smokers get so called 'cigarette breaks'. Why is it that non-smokers don't get these little breaks and simply have to make up for the smokers work while they're out puffing away. I think the whole thing is ridiculus and if you want to smoke and risk the health implications that run with it, then do it in your own time and home.

Kim, Worthing says...
10:40am Wed 25 Apr 07

As a smoker who works in a council building I strongly disagree woth removing the right for cigarette breaks. I agree however that everyone is entitled to the same amount of breaks which is why I do not take a lunch break. All staff should be given the same amount of breaks and how they choose to spend their breaks should be up to them.

Clive, Brighton says...
12:52pm Wed 25 Apr 07

The simplest way around this would be to ban smoking on the council/work premises or site; that way if people wish to go for a smoke they must leave the site. In doing this, they are not covered under the Health & Safety at work, so the persons going for a 'smoke break'must clock out/sign out before leaving the premises. Come the end of the month, when they realise that they are losing 2-3 hours a week in pay, they might look into holding back their smoking habits a little. Also, if leaving the premises and they don't sign out, that is a Health & Safety issue which could lead to dismissal.
I haven't smoked for a good 5 years now but when I work on a flow line and others go off for a smoke, I'm left to carry those by doing more work!!!!!! Why should I. It has nothing to do with human rights etc. if that was the case, perhaps we should allow the alccies and druggies to pop out for a score..................

Your sayYourArgus

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE The Argus account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?
Workers at Lewes District Council enjoy a cigarette break but this could soon become a thing of the past Workers at Lewes District Council enjoy a cigarette break but this could soon become a thing of the past

Sponsored Links


Local Services


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »