News RSS Feed


'Smoking areas would be too noisy'

9:26am Monday 30th April 2007

comment Comments (35)   Have your say »

By Katya Mira »

Plans for alternative smoking areas outside pubs have been turned down because they would be too noisy.

Landlords across Brighton and Hove are concerned about the effects the national smoking ban, due to come into force on July 1, may have on their trade.

They fear drinkers will be less likely to venture out if they are not allowed to smoke and want to build courtyards, terraces and extra outdoor floors to give them a legal place to puff.

But many of these planning applications have been turned down by Brighton and Hove City Council leaving publicans feeling thwarted at every turn.

Colin Peterson, landlord of the Farm Tavern in Western Road, Hove, said he was horrified his pub's application for a glass canopy over a few small tables at the front was turned down because it was out of keeping with the area and would encourage noisy drinkers to hang out on the street.

He said the ban meant smokers were bound to congregate outdoors so didn't see what difference the canopy would make to noise.

He said: "It just means they will get wet.

"I am very surprised at the decision - we have a lot of smokers in the pub and really need to provide a decent smoking place to keep them.

"I am worried about the effect the ban will have on our trade - it is a very difficult time to be a publican and it is giving me lots of headaches."

Two months ago The Freemasons Tavern in Western Road, Hove, was also refused permission to build a "smokers terrace" next to its upstairs bar for similar reasons.

Susie Waters, from the Freemasons, said she had taken the plunge and gone no-smoking early - opening one of the city's first non-smoking cocktail bars two weeks ago.

She said time would tell how the ban would affect the pub trade. She said: "We are sticking to our guns and hoping people get used to it.

"We're bound to take a dip in trade for a while but we are confident it will pick up.

"We thought we might as well introduce non-smoking now before the official ban so it is not so hard-hitting when everything is non-smoking.

"People have taken to it well so far and we have had some good feedback saying it is nice to be in a non-smoking atmosphere."

Plans from the Golden Cannon in St George's Road, Brighton for a new courtyard out the back and the Caxton Arms in North Gardens, Brighton for an outside 'mezzanine' floor - which would create a covered courtyard effect for smokers outside - are still under discussion.

Plans from the Eddy, in Upper Gloucester Road, Brighton to knock down the back wall, move the toilets and create an outdoor courtyard at the back were given the go-ahead.

Manager Robbie Dowell said: "At least 70 per cent of our customers smoke so the ban could hit us quite hard but hopefully they will just get used to having a fag outside.

"We are really pleased to build the courtyard, it will really help us, although I don't understand why they have turned down other places because of noise issues.

"People are going to be standing outside regardless - it is an inevitable effect of banning them from smoking inside."

A spokeswoman from the city council said: "Our job as planning authority is to consider each application on its own merits. In the case of the Farm and the Freemasons, neither pub has a garden, both their proposed smoking areas were in particularly close proximity to neighbouring flats and houses, and residents would be disturbed by the noise and also perhaps the smoke that groups of smokers would create."

How will your local pub deal with the smoking ban? Leave your comments below.


Your Say YourArgus

tim hodges, Brighton & Hove Albion says...
10:01am Mon 30 Apr 07

Look the law states No Smoking in public areas, so why are people trying to develop alternatives Passive smoking kills ask Roy Castles wife If i spot anyone smoking near me from July 2nd onwards I will make enough fuss to get the law invloved that will learn them. NO SMOKING means just that not even at The Albion.....good.

tim hodges, Brighton & Hove Border says...
10:03am Mon 30 Apr 07

Sorry my location should read Brighton and Hove border not Albion my opionion is not theirs.

A Smoke, Brighton says...
10:55am Mon 30 Apr 07

We can still smoke in the street. I will make sure if I ever see Tim Hodges, I'll blow smoke in his face.

LOL

james, Hove says...
11:12am Mon 30 Apr 07

Well Tim Hodges, lets hope you don't walk past me when I am forced out on the street to smoke. You are clearly an illiterate fool (check your spelling and grammar) but you clearly can't read as the ban only covers smoking in enclosed public places. Fuss all you want, passive smoking will be the least of your worries if you start lecturing me. Oh, and since when has Roy Castle's wife been the world expert on what kills?

Rick, Brighton says...
11:38am Mon 30 Apr 07

I don't think landlords should worry too much about pleasing smokers. They'll all be dead soon.

Sophie, Brighton says...
11:45am Mon 30 Apr 07

I'm a smoker (there I've said it) not a mass murderer as the government would have us all believe. I am kind, considerate, caring for people and the environment hard working non offending human being AND I SMOKE. So why do I feel targeted? Why do I feel that none of my good points matter? Why am I being made to reasess my socialising? That's ok these problems are trivial compared to the ones we are all going to face when this country starts replacing the revenue it has been receiving from cigarettes with other things! I know from the people I speak to that most of us are really fed up with this quietly communist state we are beginning to be. Are the overweight next? Will they be banned from eating in public places because they might be jovialy encouraging others to overeat? Seriously though, where are we going to draw the line? You non smokers have always had the right NOT to be around smokers, why are you encouraging the government to step in? Will you be happy when they target one of your life choices? Lastly I'm not going to blow smoke in anyone's face I never did before.

Rick H, Brighton says...
11:58am Mon 30 Apr 07

One thing that can't be refuted is that smoking does and can cause illness, some potentially fatal. Another is that exposure to all cigarette smoke has the same effect; you do not need to be actively smoking the tobacco to be affected ie secondary smoking. Surely, regardless of whether it is right or wrong to ban smoking in public places, what is obviously wrong is that non-smokers are exposed to others’ cigarette smoke. And, of course, non-smokers have the option not to be around smokers: but then why should they then have the option of attending and frequenting certain bars, pubs and other places taken away from them by the smokers who think they have the right to smoke anywhere. The ‘right’ to smoke does not include the ‘right’ to prevent others from using and enjoying the same facilities.

Sophie, Brighton says...
12:06pm Mon 30 Apr 07

At least that comment was constructive unlike they'll all be dead soon! It's all about choices isn't it? Why weren't landlords given the choice to become smoking or non smoking pubs or to have definite designated areas for the same giving non smokers and smokers alike the option to choose? Are we all too thick to make life choices of our own? Can you remove yourself to a non smoking area or do you need to have everywhere made non smoking?

Si, Lancing says...
12:38pm Mon 30 Apr 07

Smokers, what part of SMOKING KILLS do you not understand? If you insist on ignoring all the evidence and killing yourself, fine (one less numbskull for the rest of us to worry about), but you have absolutely no right to inflict your obnoxious and FATAL drug-taking behaviour on people who sensibly refuse to share your addiction. Grow up, and GIVE UP!

Sophie, Brighton says...
12:50pm Mon 30 Apr 07

Stress kills too! Wouldn't bother yourself if I were you, kick back relax and try to accept that not everyone wants to do what you want them to do even grown ups! However in an ideal world everyone makes the right choices at the right time. That's not the world we live in though is it. I'm sure you have made even are now making a few not so great ones of your own which is why you're so busy condeming anyone elses. Instead of hurling insults for arguments try seeing someone elses point of view and appreciate we were never meant to be androids programmed to comply. I'm against having my choices removed and I know for sure you will be when one of yours gets legislated against.

Tim Hodges, Brighton & Hove Border says...
12:56pm Mon 30 Apr 07

james wrote:
Well Tim Hodges, lets hope you don't walk past me when I am forced out on the street to smoke. You are clearly an illiterate fool (check your spelling and grammar) but you clearly can't read as the ban only covers smoking in enclosed public places. Fuss all you want, passive smoking will be the least of your worries if you start lecturing me. Oh, and since when has Roy Castle's wife been the world expert on what kills?
Well spotted I wrote it quickly as I have an important job to do here in the City. How awful someone arguing about their rights to give themselves cancer and drain the resources of the NHS. These smokers are so confrontational whenever the ban is mentioned.

mark, brighton says...
1:31pm Mon 30 Apr 07

I find it laughable how defensive smokers get when their 'right' to smoke is threatened. They end up like frightened animals in a cage, lashing out at anyone who suggests it might be a good idea to give up. There are endless excuses about civil rights, nanny states etc but they know they really don’t have a leg to stand on. Fear and Denial keeps the smoker reaching for the next ****. Is it really so scary to imagine living without cigarettes? How do all the non smokers get on with their lives without relying on that next drag?

It's only when you stop smoking for good, like I did three years ago, that the penny drops and you realise that smoking never was a pleasure for you or anyone else except the people taking your money week after week. It really is the Emperor’s New Clothes. Take the hint this legislation is making, stop the denial, and get your life back. When did you ever hear anyone saying
‘
I wish I smoked
’
?

james, Hove says...
1:45pm Mon 30 Apr 07

Tim Hodges wrote:
james wrote: Well Tim Hodges, lets hope you don't walk past me when I am forced out on the street to smoke. You are clearly an illiterate fool (check your spelling and grammar) but you clearly can't read as the ban only covers smoking in enclosed public places. Fuss all you want, passive smoking will be the least of your worries if you start lecturing me. Oh, and since when has Roy Castle's wife been the world expert on what kills?
Well spotted I wrote it quickly as I have an important job to do here in the City. How awful someone arguing about their rights to give themselves cancer and drain the resources of the NHS. These smokers are so confrontational whenever the ban is mentioned.
You were the one who said if you saw anyone smoking near you, you would get the law involved...Good luck. Still not too hot on the old grammar are you? Ever heard of a comma? Anyway Tim, if your job is so important, how come you have time to prove your ignorance of hugely publicised laws on online comments pages?

James Harris, Edinburgh says...
1:55pm Mon 30 Apr 07

Just a bit of advice from an ex-sussex bloke, now living in Edinburgh. When the smoking ban came into effect March last year, I thought it would be a good idea ( even though I was a smoker then ) unfortunately instead of concentrating the smoke and butts to the pubs, the streets became ashtrays and every nice 'beer garden' where it was nice to sit in summer and enjoy food, are now as bad as the inside of pubs used to be. Most regulars of pubs sit at home and smoke in front of their entire families, and many pubs have gone out of business forcing many hospitality people out of work. Healthier lifestyle ??? Yes and No........
Good luck.......

Drooping ****, Brighton says...
2:05pm Mon 30 Apr 07

The smoking ban has been a disaster for traditional "wet" pubs (i.e. those that don't sell food) in Scotland (takings down 25%) and Ireland (hundreds of closures).

The only people doing relatively well out of it are - surprise surprise - the big chains.


graham, portslade says...
3:21pm Mon 30 Apr 07

Blame the brewers for the smoking ban. If the brewers invested in proper air conditioning systems then non-smokers such as myself wouldn't have cause to complain about stinking of smoke after going to the pub, and needing to change clothes before I pick up my kids on returning home.
I'm happy for smoking to carry on in pubs, and there's a hug difference between well maintained and ventilated pubs, and pubs such as Fiddlers elbow.

micawber, Hove says...
3:23pm Mon 30 Apr 07

I'll declare my bias. I'm a smoker. I'm not going to fight the ban now. It's not worth the effort. What tickles me pink is the ignorance and hypocracy of 99% plus of the rabid anti-smokers. Of course they are right about the dangers of smoking. But they are quite happy to pollute the air with their cars and mobile phones. I don't. Do I have rights here? Oh, and the cost to the NHS? That rises with pension costs the longer that us reformed smokers live. You never figured that out! And lastly, I believe that it is a fact of life that we will all die one day. Time for your reality check folks.

Chris P Walker, Oman says...
3:43pm Mon 30 Apr 07

The news article refers to planning permission for glass 'umbrellas'and other ways to provide temporary shelter to smokers, it is not for or against smoking.
I work in the Middle East and see both smoking and non smoking areas in bars used, it does work out here and would have been a positive step if the smoking areas had been the less prefered one. by the way, who pays more tax per year? Smokers!

sharon, ex brighton resident says...
4:16pm Mon 30 Apr 07

I've sat here reading all the comments relating to the pending smoking ban for enclosed public areas and find myself bemused by comments such as.... "
I find it laughable how defensive smokers get when their 'right' to smoke is threatened. They end up like frightened animals in a cage, lashing out at anyone who suggests it might be a good idea to give up
"
And the comments about smoking kills.... oh so obvious... its on all the packets we buy!

Well I would like to add a few facts... drinking kills too!! Everyone is too quick to berate the smoker and yet I find myself just as frustrated with drinkers. They too act like animals in a cage... have you never witnessed the drunken fighting when a club/pub turns out? Have you ever witnessed the devestation caused to the family of a poor inocent person mowed down by the inconsiderate drunken driver, have you ever sat and listened to the poor familys suffering at the hands of a violent alcoholic? Have you ever heared of someone being arrested for being 'smoked out' and disorderly ( he he)
And yet we can walk into any supermarket and buy both cigarettes AND alcohol, most streets have a place for people to go if they wish to DRINK ALCOHOL and yet that other killing pleasure of SMOKING always takes the brunt by the anti brigades!!!

Enough.... I go to a pub and drink soft drinks.... but I know when I go there I have a choice to sit amoungst people who have diminished function abilities due to the affects of alcohol and I choose to smoke. But one thing I can guaruntee is that when I get in my car at the end of the evening I will not have peuked up over the street for someone else to clean up, I will not be found passed out on some park bench and I will certainly not be without full function at the wheel of my car.

So before anyone else decides to write any more mindless comments about smokers becomming defensive about this ban then take a look a bit deeper and imagine what it may be like if we took the ability to withdraw in confined public places the 'pleasure' of alcoholic drinking!

graham, portslade says...
4:45pm Mon 30 Apr 07

Wooowee Sharon, I think that comes under the category of 'defensive'!

graham, portslade says...
4:45pm Mon 30 Apr 07

Wooowee Sharon, I think that comes under the category of 'defensive'!

master, says...
5:13pm Mon 30 Apr 07

i think if they are caught doing this filthy,horrible thing,they should be hung end of

Ben Martin, Brighton says...
7:34pm Mon 30 Apr 07

I thought smoking inside was being banned, not noise outside.

Oh well, best ban all open air events, just in case there are smokers there and they get a little bit loud as they become increasingly crazed on nicotine.

The City Council are clearly as mad as a packet of Woodbines.

norbert, says...
7:51pm Mon 30 Apr 07

Us poor smokers are being victimised once again. The non smokers are so selfish and should stay at home if they cannot handle the odd wiff of smoke or noise. Leave the real drinking to the smokers and let the non smokers stay at home sipping thier orange juice.

Donnie, UK says...
8:19pm Mon 30 Apr 07

Join Freedom to Choose who are mounting a Judicial Review against this government

http://www.freedom2choose.co.uk/

this site is made up of Publicans, Smokers and Non Smokers.

Our site is rated 4th top in Google.

They are kicking you out now you kick them out - You smoke you Vote

Lori, USA says...
8:55pm Mon 30 Apr 07

I live in Colorado, and our smoking ban has been in effect for just under a year. Yes the bars are nicer smoke free, but many small businesses have closed. Fortunately our city council were kinder than Brighton's; they allowed establishments to build outdoor patios. Either way, it's Colorado...if you smoke in the winter, you freeze!!!

mandy, cambs says...
12:31am Tue 1 May 07

Well said Sharon,the nasty posts are always from the anti smokers.
There should have been choice Colin (article) at the momentwe can smoke outside, but that is another lie, because some,open air stations, football grounds, hospice, not even on site (disgusting) inhumane, then wait until all the smokers come out in their breaks from, factories, shops ect, the antis will be moaning again.
Ventilation and non-smoking venues should have been the way forward. WHY did the antis not open their own smokefree pubs? I do not recall they were banned from doing so. No much better other people lose their money then.
for tolerant non-smokers and smokers alike please join us at freedom2choose.co.uk it is an eye opener believe me. Brainwashing is for Countries with dictators, please wake up and help us fight this unwanted ban

Sarah, Brighton says...
9:47am Tue 1 May 07

I think the smoking ban has gone too far. I am an ex smoker, and gave up 13 years ago, but I still remember how relaxing it was to spark up with a drink sitting in a comfy seat in a pub. I think making eating areas non smoking and having a non smoking room, if possible, in a pub would have gone far enough. I choose not to go to pubs, because I don't like the smell, but would happily 'brave' the smoking area, to get to the non smoking room. I will now have to brave the smokers outside to get to the non smoking areas, what's the difference. Now I feel I won't be able to take the kids to beer gardens etc, because of the smokers outside. My kids don't like the smell. Let the smokers have their smoking areas and let the non smokers have their areas. People can then choose which area they want to be in.

Charlotte, hove says...
1:14pm Tue 1 May 07

I'd just like to add a comment to show that not all non smokers are so pious. I don't smoke and never have however I am still against the ban as there are enough warnings and people should have the right to choose, and I object to this nanny state which assumes we cannot cope with making our own decisions in life.

chris w, Blackpool says...
1:35pm Tue 1 May 07

Yes and if anyone mentions Roy Castles lung cancer again i,ll scream! Roy Castle self diagnosed himself saying he probably got lung cancer from smoky clubs, but his form of lung cancer was not normally associated with Tobacco smoke!the cause of his cancer was not proven by science!but his words are one of the reasons smokers are being made to suffer now!

LS, Brighton and Hove says...
4:25pm Tue 1 May 07

Breathing in second hand smoke kills 2 employees per day in the UK!
There are thousands of pub, restaurant and hotel workers out there who can't wait for the ban.
Breathing in second hand smoke increases the risk of lung cancer and heart disease with 25%.
Smoke if you want to - that is your choice, but look after friends, colleagues and loved ones.
Smoke outside.

LS

Phillip Morris, Texas says...
4:50pm Tue 1 May 07

LS wrote:
Breathing in second hand smoke kills 2 employees per day in the UK! There are thousands of pub, restaurant and hotel workers out there who can't wait for the ban. Breathing in second hand smoke increases the risk of lung cancer and heart disease with 25%. Smoke if you want to - that is your choice, but look after friends, colleagues and loved ones. Smoke outside. LS
And did you know that 86.7782% of statistics are mad up on the spot to suit the person creating the statistic? LS, there is no evidence for your statement and anyway, why would the good people at my tobacco company have reason to lie? ;)

Ben Martin, Brighton. says...
8:20pm Tue 1 May 07

LS wrote:
Breathing in second hand smoke kills 2 employees per day in the UK!
There are thousands of pub, restaurant and hotel workers out there who can\'t wait for the ban.
Breathing in second hand smoke increases the risk of lung cancer and heart disease with 25%.
Smoke if you want to - that is your choice, but look after friends, colleagues and loved ones.
Smoke outside.

LS
Yes.
But the story is about the City Council stopping pubs providing new outside smoking areas

They're doing it on the spurious grounds that they'd be 'noisy'.

The real litmus test for this reasoning is whether the Council do say yes to a pub wanting to do this or whether they say no to every single one.

Then we'll know its nothing to do with noise at all.


brighton girl, brighton says...
10:30pm Thu 26 Jul 07

james wrote:
Well Tim Hodges, lets hope you don't walk past me when I am forced out on the street to smoke. You are clearly an illiterate fool (check your spelling and grammar) but you clearly can't read as the ban only covers smoking in enclosed public places. Fuss all you want, passive smoking will be the least of your worries if you start lecturing me. Oh, and since when has Roy Castle's wife been the world expert on what kills?
hear hear who do some non smokers think they are

sussex, brighton says...
10:56pm Thu 26 Jul 07

master wrote:
i think if they are caught doing this filthy,horrible thing,they should be hung end of
who do you think you are how dare you bit on the definsive and very nasty so you get smokers hung for smoking idiot

Your sayYourArgus

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE The Argus account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?
The Farm Tavern, Hove, is not allowed a glass canopy over tables at the front The Farm Tavern, Hove, is not allowed a glass canopy over tables at the front

Sponsored Links


Local Services


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »