News RSS Feed


Health boss wielding axe does not live in Sussex

6:54am Friday 22nd June 2007

comment Comments (6)   Have your say »

By Richard Gurner »

The man responsible for proposed hospital service cuts across West Sussex does not even live in the county, The Argus can reveal.

Last night there was mounting anger from campaigners who said John Wilderspin, the chief executive of West Sussex Primary Care Trust (PCT), was not interested in the county.

There were also claims that if Mr Wilderspin lived in the area and not Petersfield in Hampshire, the dramatic cuts at the region's hospitals would not be on the cards.

Tom Wye, the chairman of the Keep Worthing and Southlands Hospital campaign, said: "Once it is all over he'll never visit Sussex again.

"He is elected by nobody in Sussex, he's not interested in Sussex and he is decimating our medical facilities.

"If he lived in Worthing he would be in a very uncomfortable position. People are so angry."

The changes in services announced on Wednesday will see two hospitals lose their accident and emergency departments and other services, leaving only one major hospital in West Sussex.

Worthing Hospital, St Richard's Hospital in Chichester and the Princess Royal in Haywards Heath face losing their accident and emergency departments, maternity services and intensive care units as a result of the changes.

Prior to his appointment at West Sussex PCT, Mr Wilderspin was joint boss at East Hampshire PCT and Fareham and Gosport PCT for 18 months where he oversaw similar shake ups of services.

Worthing West MP Peter Bottomley said: "I hope where he lives is not important but if the chief executive had lived in the Worthing area, I believe things would have been different.

"We knew he came from Hampshire with a tough reputation and I hope it doesn't matter that he is not personally affected."

Ron Noakes, the chairman of the Friends of Worthing Hospitals, said: "The proposed changes will not affect him at all.

"We must have more than one major hospital and here we have someone not living in Sussex telling us that we can't.

"He's got no affinity with Sussex. Does he care about people in Sussex? Not in the slightest because he doesn't live here."

Mid Sussex district councillor and health campaigner Paddy Henry said focus should not be on where Mr Wilderspin lives.

He said: "I couldn't give a damn if he lived in Iceland. It's what they do and how they do it is important."

Luke Blair, a PCT spokesman said it was wrong for campaigners to rest the blame for the proposals on Mr Wilderspin.

He said: "He happens to be one of the public figures leading the project. It's not him and him alone making the decisions.

"Where he lives now is less important than his huge amount of professionalism and experience in health issues and surly that's the important thing.

"He is very committed to the local area and that local services improve for the local people.

"We should really be focusing on the issues here and that is how we plan services for the local area.

"Let's have a debate about that and that is what the consultation is about."

Mr Wilderspin carried out a similar shake-up of services at Fareham and Gosport PCT two years ago when it recorded a £5 million deficit and he has a reputation as a trouble shooter.

Speaking from his home he told The Argus that non-executive members of the PCT board and clinical members live and work in West Sussex.

He said: "The concern that has been expressed implies we should be making our decision on my experience and my views of healthcare in West Sussex.

"Consultation is actually about finding out the views of local residents and users of health services in West Sussex so that we can take account of their views when we make ultimate decisions."

What do you think? Should people not affected by the hospital plans be allowed to hold the key to their futures? Leave your comments below.

Your Say YourArgus

s, sussex says...
8:11am Fri 22 Jun 07

come on.

why can't the suits leave our hospitals alone,especially if they don't live in the area,we all need the use of hospitals at some time.

i can't see how they can more pressure on brighton,redhill,wor

thing and other hospitals that they might consider as being the best for people in sussex to use.if you have an emergency you need the closest hospital not one that the possibility that you could get stuck in heavy traffic and not be able to park.also i think this will also cause an increase in people using ambulances to get to different hospitals.

leave our hospitals alone.

prehaps the answer is to get rid of some of the top suits that just sit in the nice offices and bring back matrons.

if they are taking all the services away from these hospitals why build them in the first place....

Sue, Hove says...
8:39am Fri 22 Jun 07

I wonder how much money has already been wasted by PCTs on this consultation. It is ridiculous he knows nothing about this county, PCTs should be scrapped before they waste any nore NHS money. I am sure they could have funded all NHS hospitals with their ridiculous waste of money on consultations.

jim, brighton says...
8:42am Fri 22 Jun 07

So much for having 24 hours to save the NHS.
Crawley has grown enormously but has already lost its A&E.
Now Haywards Heath looks like losing A&E and maternity at the Princess Royal even though Burgess Hill and Haywards Heath have grown rapidly.
Uckfield, near by, is expanding fast.
The Government wants thousands of extra homes to be built in the South East.
No new main roads are planned to handle the extra traffic that this will inevitably generate - despite the promise of joined-up government.
And now people face a longer journey and greater uncertainty when their medical needs are most urgent with fewer casualty and maternity wards and intensive care units.
We are told billions of pounds of extra money have been poured into the NHS yet key services are being cut and hospital-acquired infections are a bigger problem than they've been for generations.
Something has gone very wrong. The Argus and newspapers like it must keep asking what's going on and telling us - the readers and taxpayers.
Our lives and those of our friends and families may depend upon it.

rob, brighton says...
8:49am Fri 22 Jun 07

The Royal Sussex A&E department is already visibly stretched too often. The hospital had to shut one floor of maternity not so long ago. If casualty and maternity are closed at the Princess Royal in Haywards Heath, Brighton's crowded streets could lead to life-threatening delays for those needing treatment. And our dirty wards - yes, I've seen the state of them for myself - run by too few staff who are often dangerously overworked will struggle to cope with even greater demand. The outlook is frightening. We need some bureaucrats but the balance is way out of kilter. Sack some suits and save our services.

Lindsay Smith, Loxwood says...
8:51am Fri 22 Jun 07

If they shut both the A&E Units under threat in Guildford and Chichester, you will be as good as dead if you have an accident in Loxwood.

graham, portslade says...
3:03pm Fri 22 Jun 07

once it's gone, its gone.
The population of our part of the world is rapidly growing. How many deaths will it take before the pen pushers reinstate the removed services in the future? We all know that many will have to die before these shot term decisions are over ruled.
In 10yrs time these services will have to be returned as the trasnport system will have ground to a halt, and the primary hospitals will be deluged; but at what cost in the meantime eh?

Your sayYourArgus

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE The Argus account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?

Hot Jobs

Local Services


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »