Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
7:00am Thursday 30th April 2009 in
The managing director of a controversial factory at the centre of a major protest has told campaigners they have got their facts wrong.
Thousands of people are expected to arrive in Brighton on Monday to target the EDO MBM/ITT factory.
The organisers, Smash EDO, have been fighting for six years to close the base in Home Farm Road in Moulsecoomb, Brighton, but they have said this will be their biggest day of action yet.
But EDO MBM/ITT managing director Paul Hills says the campaigners have failed to acknowledge important facts about the factory.
In a rare interview he told The Argus: "The extent of what we manufacture is the parts for some aircraft – the components are at the end of a very long supply chain.
"We make things that ensure the safe carriage and release of weapons from aircraft.
"We supply the UK Ministry of Defence. I would, and have, stood up in court and sworn under oath that we don't supply to Israel which is one of the things Smash EDO accuse us of."
But the group, who have described the bank holiday protest as a 'mass street party against, war, greed and militarism', were quick to hit back and accuse the company of hiding under a veil of secrecy.
Smash EDO spokesman Andrew Beckett said: "If that is the case, I ask them to prove it.
"They have failed to comply with our 2007 Freedom of Information (FOI) requests asking for a breakdown of where the arms they make go and whether they have a licence to supply Israel.
"If they really don't supply other countries it would be a help for them to go public with the facts."
Mr Hills said the company had nothing to hide but were not at liberty to discuss what they made or where the products went as it is “a matter for their customers only”.
He said: “The FOI was blocked by the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) so they could take it up with them.
“BERR control export licensing, I would not have the direct power to block anything.
“I will not get in to an argument with people who know very little about what we do. They are only using parts of information.
“I won’t get into what these items are or where they go because that’s for our customers only.
“I strongly object to the use of emotive language such as calling us an ‘arms factory’ and a ‘bomb factory’. It’s very annoying and it’s simply not true.”
More than 800 people attended the Smash EDO demonstrations last year and the group have estimated Monday’s march attendance could be double that.
The meeting place and route of the demonstration have not yet been disclosed but the campaigners have uploaded a map of more than 30 banks and businesses they may target on their website.
Mr Hills said the EDO MBM/ITT factory would have security in place on the day.
Comments(82)
salty_pete
says...
8:13am Thu 30 Apr 09
Fight Back
says...
8:34am Thu 30 Apr 09
salty_pete wrote:That's because they are too STUPID to work out the supply chain. Strange that they don't target the numerous defence companies in Crawley - then they could "protest" against a dozen in one go. I use the word "protest" - what they actually do is pick a fight with the police while hiding their faces because they are COWARDS. They then go on to disrupt local residents for no good reason. All because they fail to gather correct facts. It's not for EDO to prove their innocence - it's down to Smash EDO to prove EDO are guilty. EDO are a compnay employing local people ( unlike to protestors who use bus-a-mob to increase their numbers ) and who are carrying out a LEGAL trade. Smash EDO should concentrate on getting the trade banned if they are really serious but of course they wouldn't get their ruck with the police then. SCUM the lot of them - GO AWAY BACK TO THE TOWNS AND CITIES YOU'VE BEEN BUSSED IN FROM - YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE.
These protest groups are forever getting their facts or science wrong (Brent Spar anybody), but it never stops them getting publicity. Why not protest at every manufacturer in a very long chain? Have they only chosen this factory because it is seen a soft target and they can get their misguided, ill informed views expressed in the media. This factory is doing nothing illegal and should not be the target of the criminal damage these anarchists intend to inflict upon it.
kennydoit
says...
8:38am Thu 30 Apr 09
Mossy
says...
9:00am Thu 30 Apr 09
smalltowngirl
says...
9:08am Thu 30 Apr 09
newbiea
says...
9:40am Thu 30 Apr 09
jo w
says...
10:34am Thu 30 Apr 09
davyboy
says...
10:42am Thu 30 Apr 09
jo w wrote:well said jo, and as someone else pointed out, this electronic stuff would be made elsewhere anyway
I should think 90%+ of the 'protestors' have no idea what they are protesting about. It's just a day out to cause trouble and it makes them feel important.
Mr nothing head
says...
10:43am Thu 30 Apr 09
Variable
says...
10:53am Thu 30 Apr 09
Dickens Cider
says...
11:00am Thu 30 Apr 09
Wilftop
says...
11:54am Thu 30 Apr 09
bibble
says...
1:10pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Osama bin there
says...
1:18pm Thu 30 Apr 09
bc909885
says...
1:31pm Thu 30 Apr 09
bc909885
says...
1:31pm Thu 30 Apr 09
TreasureIsland
says...
1:40pm Thu 30 Apr 09
jooj
says...
1:45pm Thu 30 Apr 09
El Burro
says...
1:46pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Mr nothing head
says...
1:49pm Thu 30 Apr 09
bc909885 wrote:That's a silly argument, aviation fuel, paint and glass have a plethora of uses (well, maybe not the fuel). Bomb release systems have only one use: dropping bombs to cause death and destruction.
Fighback is spot on. What about companies who make aviation fuel, paint, glass the list is endless.
They won't go to Crawley - it's not as nice a day out as going to Brighton.
jooj
says...
1:55pm Thu 30 Apr 09
salty_pete
says...
2:10pm Thu 30 Apr 09
HELLGIRL
says...
2:17pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Carl Bugenhagen
says...
2:32pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Fight Back
says...
2:57pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Carl Bugenhagen wrote:I don't have an issue with peaceful protest but Smash EDO have an agenda to cause damage and fear rather than any real protest. Why don't you protest outside those companies that make the bombs themselves ? Or what about Thales in Crawley that sell "defence goods " to the Chinese government ?
Fightback, I live here and all protesters are welcome. It's soulless people who cannot joint the dots and understand that EDO profit directly from murder that I would choose to ban from the city, but it's a free world. Get over it.
jooj
says...
2:58pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Carl Bugenhagen wrote:Partly true, as mentioned above, Smash EDO is run and organized by Brighton Residents, so residents are moaning about residents. 50/50.
Fightback, I live here and all protesters are welcome. It's soulless people who cannot joint the dots and understand that EDO profit directly from murder that I would choose to ban from the city, but it's a free world. Get over it.
Dixonian
says...
3:12pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Pat Mustard
says...
3:47pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Peacehaven Paul
says...
4:16pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Osama bin there
says...
4:17pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Dixonian wrote:There is a right to PEACEFUL PROTEST, which I firmly believe in. Unfortunately on previous occasions with smash EDO, the protest has been far from peaceful (whatever their spokespeople say).
Seems to me that Smash EDO are a little extreme, and misguided with their protests (ie. irritating the locals with their disruption). But they may have a point.
Also, makes me laugh when people are derided for using their democratic right to protest. Happens all the time. "At least these people have the right to protest!" Yeah exactly and they're using it.
John Steed
says...
4:45pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Maggie Thatcher
says...
5:26pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Maggie Thatcher
says...
5:33pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Mr nothing head
says...
5:35pm Thu 30 Apr 09
salty_pete wrote:Thank you, I admire your sharp wit and brilliantly thought out post.
The comments in support of Smash EDO by "Mr nothing head" has only got one thing right .. his nom de plume !
MoreMikey
says...
5:52pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Peacehaven Paul wrote:Probably, but she doesn't have a leg to stand on.
I wonder if Nicola Fisher will be there??
Jim BB
says...
6:03pm Thu 30 Apr 09
MoreMikey
says...
6:25pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Maggie Thatcher
says...
6:32pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Jim BB wrote:Jim,
I think we all agree that everyone has the right to protest/demonstrate but I wonder how many will end up in hospital on Monday when the protests turn violent.
Their own 'leader' said that he can't control what happens and people are being bussed in from all over the country.
I'm staying out of the way on Monday - it's going to be chaos. It's a shame they don't realise that peaceful protests are far more effective and earn support from others. It's how to make people listen - it worked for Gandhi.
Mr nothing head
says...
6:38pm Thu 30 Apr 09
bibble
says...
6:39pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Jim BB wrote:Unfortunately you are wrong.
I think we all agree that everyone has the right to protest/demonstrate but I wonder how many will end up in hospital on Monday when the protests turn violent.
Their own 'leader' said that he can't control what happens and people are being bussed in from all over the country.
I'm staying out of the way on Monday - it's going to be chaos. It's a shame they don't realise that peaceful protests are far more effective and earn support from others. It's how to make people listen - it worked for Gandhi.
Maggie Thatcher
says...
6:42pm Thu 30 Apr 09
King from Hove
says...
6:55pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Dragonfire
says...
7:36pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Dragonfire
says...
7:40pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Osama bin there
says...
7:46pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Maggie Thatcher wrote:F off back to your other thread.
MoreMikey, EDO/ITT ARE they Americans! If they know they are effectively supplying Israel it makes no difference the sleight of hand going on. Would it make a difference if I were running a shop and selling fags and booze to an adult I knew would go round the corner and give them to kids... Which is clearly illegal- but conveniently difficult to prove.
Maggie Thatcher
says...
9:19pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Osama bin there wrote:Run out of arguments already?
Maggie Thatcher wrote:F off back to your other thread.
MoreMikey, EDO/ITT ARE they Americans! If they know they are effectively supplying Israel it makes no difference the sleight of hand going on. Would it make a difference if I were running a shop and selling fags and booze to an adult I knew would go round the corner and give them to kids... Which is clearly illegal- but conveniently difficult to prove.
GVG
says...
9:34pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Leon
says...
9:52pm Thu 30 Apr 09
MoreMikey wrote:MORE MIKEY FOR PRIME MINISTER!!!!
If one is to believe these posts, EDO is manufacturing bombs/bomb parts/bomb delivery systems specifically for the Israelis, so they can murder children as many children as they see fit. What a load of cr@p! If you have a minute, you could easily find out that they make Zero Retention Force Arming Units, a small but vital part of the aircraft in which they are used. Additionally, Israel is not their only customer, if they are a customer at all. These devices are used on the U.S. Navy BRU-32,BRU-41,BRU-42 , BRU-45, the USAF BRU-46 & BRU-47, the RAAF MAU-12, the European Tornado HMERU & LMERU, and the IAF VER-2 & VER-4. I don't see Israel listed there, but as another poster suggested, the US probably buys them and resells them (or, more accurately, gives them away to countries they support. Like many other posters, I believe that the majority of the "protesters" won't have a clue what they are there for, other than the pap fed to them by the manipulative SMASH EDO organizers, most of which is half-truths and smoke-and-mirrors. I also believe that most people in Brighton don't give a flying four letter word about SMASH EDO and don't want a bunch of derelicts out for day of mayhem in their neighbourhoods. I don't live in Brighton any more, and even I don't want them there. And while I'm on a rant, why does the Freedom of Information Act apply to a business? Are you suggesting that anyone can demand to know what your local greengrocer pays for apples, or who he buys them from, just because you want to know? Using that logic, I could ask SMASH EDO where they get their financial support and be outraged when they (of course) refuse to answer. The only thing you jerks will achieve is to p!ss off the people of Brighton, who will have to pay for the costs of your "protest", to the point where you'll become pariahs - if you haven't done so already. Hmph!
Maggie Thatcher
says...
9:54pm Thu 30 Apr 09
GVG wrote:Protest completed - We'll see. Sounds like the plod are egging for trouble, and setting a bogus pretext for violent action.
Us 'Brightonians' and OUR supporters have said all they need to, got the message!!
You can protest all you want outside these places, but no one will be there to hear you and remember one thing, come Tuesday morning it's back to business as usual.
Protest completed - yes
Nothing accomplished - yes
Clean up operation needed - yes
Local residents paying for this - yes
Brighton P!$$ed off - YES, YES, YES !!!
Do you care about us - NO NO NO !!!!
hovesweethove
says...
10:25pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Maggie Thatcher
says...
10:39pm Thu 30 Apr 09
hovesweethove wrote:Lord help us if we see a brain drain on baby killers!
Will these idiots only be happy when we lose more skilled jobs in Brighton and a company like EDO decides to up sticks and go to France or Germanyto the benefit of their economies?
More unemployment = the Government not being able to afford to pay benefits to these work shy hippy troublemakers.
Suppose there could be a silver lining afterall.
As a fellow company director and knowing just how difficult it is to keep a company going at the moment I for one will be sending an email of support to Mr Hills tomorrow.
MoreMikey
says...
10:44pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Leon wrote:Trust me, you REALLY don't want that.
MoreMikey wrote:MORE MIKEY FOR PRIME MINISTER!!!!
If one is to believe these posts, EDO is manufacturing bombs/bomb parts/bomb delivery systems specifically for the Israelis, so they can murder children as many children as they see fit. What a load of cr@p! If you have a minute, you could easily find out that they make Zero Retention Force Arming Units, a small but vital part of the aircraft in which they are used. Additionally, Israel is not their only customer, if they are a customer at all. These devices are used on the U.S. Navy BRU-32,BRU-41,BRU-42 , BRU-45, the USAF BRU-46 & BRU-47, the RAAF MAU-12, the European Tornado HMERU & LMERU, and the IAF VER-2 & VER-4. I don't see Israel listed there, but as another poster suggested, the US probably buys them and resells them (or, more accurately, gives them away to countries they support. Like many other posters, I believe that the majority of the "protesters" won't have a clue what they are there for, other than the pap fed to them by the manipulative SMASH EDO organizers, most of which is half-truths and smoke-and-mirrors. I also believe that most people in Brighton don't give a flying four letter word about SMASH EDO and don't want a bunch of derelicts out for day of mayhem in their neighbourhoods. I don't live in Brighton any more, and even I don't want them there. And while I'm on a rant, why does the Freedom of Information Act apply to a business? Are you suggesting that anyone can demand to know what your local greengrocer pays for apples, or who he buys them from, just because you want to know? Using that logic, I could ask SMASH EDO where they get their financial support and be outraged when they (of course) refuse to answer. The only thing you jerks will achieve is to p!ss off the people of Brighton, who will have to pay for the costs of your "protest", to the point where you'll become pariahs - if you haven't done so already. Hmph!
TheInsider
says...
11:45pm Thu 30 Apr 09
Maggie Thatcher
says...
12:06am Fri 1 May 09
TheInsider wrote:My that's mighty big of Mighty Whitey allowing people who have risked their lives for the UK to live here. You talk like that is some privilege, when it is the very LEAST that should be offered.
As I said in an earlier post, protesters who burden already overstretched emergency services with a clear threat of "targets in the city" are potentially killing babies and anyone else who is in need of social care here in Brighton.
They are stealing resources from children, family services and elderly social care as vital resources are funnelled into manning this protest, which by its very name -Smash EDO - is antagonistic.
Yes, protest, but choose a method and a language which is less aggressive and antagonistic and frightening to locals. You will have far more success in engaging with local people. Look at the support the Gurkhas are gaining. While most of Britain don't want more "migrants" to the UK, they have bucked the trend and the majority of British people believe they should have homes here. Not a single protest with angry words or threats.
Unfortunately the campaigners of this protest have portrayed themselves (with their choice of vocabulary) as some kind of "untamed and unpredictable" army without a leader or true clear message. They convey an image of wanting to sacrifice UK communities to save another as if they are modelling themselves on some kind of paramilitary organisation. This behaviour is often that of disaffected men, usually under 40. Successful campaigns have always been carried out in peace. Maggie, you are not a peace loving hippy, who wants a silent march through town and lays down in the road covered in flowers, you speak in an aggressive, angry and bitter way which has not engaged people to the cause.
People will now protect EDO which is the opposite of what you wanted.......or is it? You are clearly intelligent so perhaps you are a double agent planted by EDO to get locals on board.
Leon
says...
12:52am Fri 1 May 09
Leon
says...
12:52am Fri 1 May 09
Mr nothing head
says...
10:29am Fri 1 May 09
Mr nothing head wrote:With hindsight, I'd go further than that, actually, and I submit that Mr. Paul Hills is an outright liar and has tried to mislead the public by feeding false information to The Argus.
MoreMikey says:
"Israel is not their only customer, if they are a customer at all. These devices are used on the U.S. Navy BRU-32,BRU-41,BRU-42
, BRU-45, the USAF BRU-46 & BRU-47, the RAAF MAU-12, the European Tornado HMERU & LMERU, and the IAF VER-2 & VER-4. I don't see Israel listed there"
Ermmm, IAF stands for Israeli Air Force, VER-2 and VER-4 are bomb racks designed by IMI (Israeli Military Industries).. So you've proved the point about EDO components being used by Israel, even though Mr. Hills won't admit it...
Fight Back
says...
11:15am Fri 1 May 09
Mr nothing head wrote:That's a plain stupid arguement - it's not EDO / ITT that drop the bombs. Why don't we campaign to close down Ford as drunk drivers use their goods to kill people ?
Mr nothing head wrote:With hindsight, I'd go further than that, actually, and I submit that Mr. Paul Hills is an outright liar and has tried to mislead the public by feeding false information to The Argus.
MoreMikey says:
"Israel is not their only customer, if they are a customer at all. These devices are used on the U.S. Navy BRU-32,BRU-41,BRU-42
, BRU-45, the USAF BRU-46 & BRU-47, the RAAF MAU-12, the European Tornado HMERU & LMERU, and the IAF VER-2 & VER-4. I don't see Israel listed there"
Ermmm, IAF stands for Israeli Air Force, VER-2 and VER-4 are bomb racks designed by IMI (Israeli Military Industries).. So you've proved the point about EDO components being used by Israel, even though Mr. Hills won't admit it...
If someone against Smash EDO and their cause can unwittingly find and post evidence that Israeli bombs are being dropped by EDO/MBM technology then it's quite clear what is happening here.
Regardless of whether or not you agree with EDO or whether you feel their actions and sales are lawful or otherwise; Paul Hills has LIED to the press to paint his company as somehow on a moral higher ground.
Arms dealers have no morals. They thrive off death and destruction. EDO are not a friendly, happy, butter-wouldn't-melt company targeted by a bunch of loony renegades. Standing up to defend them just so you can criticise some 'hippies' doesn't help anyone. They (or ITT at least) would happily contribute to your deaths if there was a decent profit margin in it.. Nationalities or politics don't come into it, their agenda is strictly that of profit, as history shows us..
Maggie Thatcher
says...
11:58am Fri 1 May 09
El Burro
says...
12:01pm Fri 1 May 09
Maggie Thatcher wrote:They won't get very far, like most people who live a harmonious existence within the miracle of consumer capitalism, I will be drunk in my back garden on Monday, laughing at your pitiful attempts to upset the town of Brighton because you're too narrow minded to understand that a few smashed windows/arrests is not going to change anything. I think you need to read proper books a bit more, instead of left-wing propaganda.
El Burro, The Hollingbury Aggro Men Of course you'll one of the first people police will have to interview if someone gets assaulted by an unknown member of the public...
Maggie Thatcher
says...
12:24pm Fri 1 May 09
Mr nothing head
says...
12:26pm Fri 1 May 09
El Burro wrote:It's going to be a good natured street party, not a ruckus.. The only people who have insuinuated that are the Argus and moronic commentators on here, even the police themselves have said they're expecting the event to go off peacefully, read their last couple of press releases.. Also, read up on Reclaim The Streets- it's far from a violent or destructive movement at all...
Maggie Thatcher wrote:They won't get very far, like most people who live a harmonious existence within the miracle of consumer capitalism, I will be drunk in my back garden on Monday, laughing at your pitiful attempts to upset the town of Brighton because you're too narrow minded to understand that a few smashed windows/arrests is not going to change anything. I think you need to read proper books a bit more, instead of left-wing propaganda.
El Burro, The Hollingbury Aggro Men Of course you'll one of the first people police will have to interview if someone gets assaulted by an unknown member of the public...
Fight Back
says...
12:26pm Fri 1 May 09
Maggie Thatcher wrote:The Smash EDO web site uses plenty of provocative language that implies they want or at least support violent action. That combined with past demos where they have attacked the police, EDO property, private individuals property and EDO employees clears shows their intent. They have never condemned the violence at previous demos nor do they take any action the prevent it. Therefore they can't complain when they get painted as mindless thugs. Thugs that cover their faces because they are ashamed of their own actions.
Fight back,
vehicles are not designed to kill, bomb delivery systems are only designed for the purpose of killing.
But if you were to supply a car to someone you knew was going to use it to kill someone you would become an accessory to murder... if you DESIGNED and built the car to facilitate murder, the charges would be even more serious.
EDO are selling components designed to kill, to people who are know to commit murder and who have committed murder with their equipment.
Does that really sound innocent to you? Just because they never pushed the trigger themselves... merely assisted the person who did?
Smash EDO have made no threats of violence and riot so what the hell are you talking about???
So, you have war criminals in your back yard, and all you care about if swallowing some utter rubbish your local rag has cooked up... reread their hatchet job. Smash EDO do not imply anywhere they have violent intentions... it's the Argus that seems to have elicited conjecture about possible violence from various people who are unsympathetic to Smash EDO. Hardly rocket science or post-grad level media studies?
But god forbid you should get upset about your local rag yanking your chain; the 3 Minute Hate is possibly your only pleasure life.
Maggie Thatcher
says...
12:34pm Fri 1 May 09
Maggie Thatcher
says...
12:34pm Fri 1 May 09
El Burro
says...
1:33pm Fri 1 May 09
Maggie Thatcher wrote:A "stern talking to" is not a threat of violence, oh Great one.
4$$, well if threatening people with violence is your idea of harmonious, it is no wonder you find it so difficult to form a coherent argument.
Code Red
says...
3:25pm Fri 1 May 09
Fight Back
says...
3:38pm Fri 1 May 09
Code Red wrote:Ha ha ha - yet again showing that Smash EDO, rent-a-mob et al have not been able to research their facts properly.
Actually, without an arming unit (based on my experience with RAF ones), Israeli jets would be able to bomb away quite happily. They just wouldn't be able to jettison them inertly in an emergency.
So, even if the UK business is supplying them (when it appears to be the case that the US one is, but hey, guess airfare is expensive to justify a foreign protest) they are hardly going to stop the Israelis by not supplying them. The IDFAF (that's the proper shorthand BTW, IAF is the Indian Air Force. At least according to just about every publication I've ever read) would just have to be a bit more careful...
As for VER-2/4. A bit of reading up (now I know why I kept those Jane's all these years) shows them to be multi-store carriers, not the actual aircraft pylon racks. Now, if they are anything like our multi-store carriers on the Tornado and Harrier, they are probably gathering dust because they can't carry smart weapons. Certainly a GIS reveals no recent shots (including a few from the December period) of any IDFAF F-16 carrying anything like them.
So if we accept that the Israeli connection makes up a large chunk of the resentment we'll see on Monday, we have a protest against a safety critical device (as they were always refered to in the RAF),manufactured in the US (not Brighton), for a piece of obsolete and likely out of use equipment.
Hmm... I guess if anyone should be protesting its the Israeli tax-payer for having the IDFAF waste their money on keeping a museum piece!
johnsmith48
says...
7:44pm Fri 1 May 09
TheInsider
says...
8:00pm Fri 1 May 09
MoreMikey
says...
8:31pm Fri 1 May 09
johnsmith48
says...
8:44pm Fri 1 May 09
Fight Back
says...
8:53pm Fri 1 May 09
Mr nothing head
says...
12:09am Sat 2 May 09
Code Red wrote:When referring to VER-2/4 IAF is the Israeli military seeing as they're the only country to produce, develop and utilise these systems...
Actually, without an arming unit (based on my experience with RAF ones), Israeli jets would be able to bomb away quite happily. They just wouldn't be able to jettison them inertly in an emergency.
So, even if the UK business is supplying them (when it appears to be the case that the US one is, but hey, guess airfare is expensive to justify a foreign protest) they are hardly going to stop the Israelis by not supplying them. The IDFAF (that's the proper shorthand BTW, IAF is the Indian Air Force. At least according to just about every publication I've ever read) would just have to be a bit more careful...
As for VER-2/4. A bit of reading up (now I know why I kept those Jane's all these years) shows them to be multi-store carriers, not the actual aircraft pylon racks. Now, if they are anything like our multi-store carriers on the Tornado and Harrier, they are probably gathering dust because they can't carry smart weapons. Certainly a GIS reveals no recent shots (including a few from the December period) of any IDFAF F-16 carrying anything like them.
So if we accept that the Israeli connection makes up a large chunk of the resentment we'll see on Monday, we have a protest against a safety critical device (as they were always refered to in the RAF),manufactured in the US (not Brighton), for a piece of obsolete and likely out of use equipment.
Hmm... I guess if anyone should be protesting its the Israeli tax-payer for having the IDFAF waste their money on keeping a museum piece!
kkj
says...
12:55am Sat 2 May 09
worthinglad
says...
8:20am Sat 2 May 09
kkj wrote:kkj you have now`admitted to being a jelly baby murderer. You will have the great unwashed on your doorstep on monday, move quickly!
IAF may be the Israelis, the Indians, the Iraqis or for all we know, even the Inuits. Lets assume for the moment the parts are 'going to Israel'. The problem you appear to have is not that the parts are going to Israel but that Paul Hills lied about it. (allegedly - can't afford a libel case right now) According to the article, he states that they don't supply Israel; this is probably true - they may supply the people who ultimately supply Israel - he's not denied that - but that doesn't make him a liar. Bassetts don't directly supply me but I still eat their Jelly Babies.
anticowley
says...
10:36am Sat 2 May 09
kkj
says...
10:40am Sat 2 May 09
worthinglad wrote:The jelly babies were already dead. I'm merely an accessory after the fact, or part of the great jelly baby murder conspiracy
kkj wrote:kkj you have now`admitted to being a jelly baby murderer. You will have the great unwashed on your doorstep on monday, move quickly!
IAF may be the Israelis, the Indians, the Iraqis or for all we know, even the Inuits. Lets assume for the moment the parts are 'going to Israel'. The problem you appear to have is not that the parts are going to Israel but that Paul Hills lied about it. (allegedly - can't afford a libel case right now) According to the article, he states that they don't supply Israel; this is probably true - they may supply the people who ultimately supply Israel - he's not denied that - but that doesn't make him a liar. Bassetts don't directly supply me but I still eat their Jelly Babies.
worthinglad
says...
3:33pm Sat 2 May 09
kkj wrote:KKJ You poor deluded fool the fact they were dead when you eat them, will not stop the Smash the dead jelly babe eaters. They will descend upon you like the four horseman of the unwashed and smite you verily as the Smug Bourgeois Jelly Babe eater you most certainly are. hide leave the country quickly.
worthinglad wrote:The jelly babies were already dead. I'm merely an accessory after the fact, or part of the great jelly baby murder conspiracykkj wrote: IAF may be the Israelis, the Indians, the Iraqis or for all we know, even the Inuits. Lets assume for the moment the parts are 'going to Israel'. The problem you appear to have is not that the parts are going to Israel but that Paul Hills lied about it. (allegedly - can't afford a libel case right now) According to the article, he states that they don't supply Israel; this is probably true - they may supply the people who ultimately supply Israel - he's not denied that - but that doesn't make him a liar. Bassetts don't directly supply me but I still eat their Jelly Babies.kkj you have now`admitted to being a jelly baby murderer. You will have the great unwashed on your doorstep on monday, move quickly!
Bog Vern
says...
6:07pm Sat 2 May 09
myselfishgenes
says...
6:28pm Mon 4 May 09
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for Jobs in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley and more...
Search Now »
Find the right person in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley...
Search Now »
Search for Homes in Brighton, Worthing, Hove, Lewes...
Search Now »
Search for Cars in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley...
Search Now »
danacoed says...
8:03am Thu 30 Apr 09