Plan is anti-democratic

Plan is anti-democratic

Plan is anti-democratic

First published in Letters

Hurstpierpoint Parish Council submitted a neighbourhood plan to the council earlier this year to form the cornerstone for development in our village, despite having received only 400 comments from its 7,000 strong population - and many comments objected to the proposals for new housing and a business park on our green fields.

I’ve been looking into the neighbourhood plan process and you can see on the parish’s website that even Mid Sussex District Council objected as part of this consultation.

I have grave concerns about the lack of democracy. Are we as a community too late to have our say?

Any inspector worth his salt should send this plan back to the drawing board. Housing numbers have not yet been ratified by the district, so how have the parish come up with specific housing numbers?

How can a neighbourhood plan, which must adhere to the district-wide plan, be approved before a district-wide plan is agreed?

We must plan correctly for our future and provide the right housing – not too much, and not inadequate.

The Neighbourhood Plan also includes a site for new houses which was refused by the planners due to concerns about suitability and it was a site strongly objected to by fellow parishioners so why is it still in a plan supposed to represent villagers’ views?

The Neighbourhood Plan can only be accepted if more than half of the votes from our community are in favour at a referendum. It should not succeed in its current format because it does not plan for the future of Hurstpierpoint.

I know we need to provide new homes for our children, but they need to be in sustainable locations, accompanied by the infrastructure our village needs in locations which will retain our village character.

Let’s hope the inspector listens to objectors as the parish council certainly hasn't.

Mr J Brown

Western Road

Hurstpierpoint

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:23pm Mon 1 Sep 14

Fred'smate says...

What you should be looking at is the precise vote, rather than 'many' which is too vague.

If the majority of those who voted want this development, then democracy has worked.
What you should be looking at is the precise vote, rather than 'many' which is too vague. If the majority of those who voted want this development, then democracy has worked. Fred'smate
  • Score: -3

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree