Knee-jerk reaction to Jimmy Savile is no way to fix it

As the sordid and sleazy secrets of Jimmy Savile continue to seep out and inquiries into the organisations he used and abused are set up, I just hope that the fallout doesn’t result in yet more regulation that abnormalises the relationship between adults and children.

That’s not to trivialise the dreadful ordeals suffered by his many victims, some of whom live in Sussex, or the culpability of those accused of turning a blind eye within those organisations, including the BBC, the NHS, children’s homes and Broadmoor secure hospital.

Inquiries into how this man was able to get away with so much for so long are essential and it is a very real possibility that when they reach their conclusions and their findings are acted upon, there will be a kneejerk reaction resulting in hurried, ill thought-out legislation that further restricts adult interaction with children.

But Savile was a one-off (as far as we know) who used a unique technique to disguise his devilish desires. His charity work masked his true nature, and while some fans are still lauding the millions he made for good causes such as the disabilities unit at Stoke Mandeville Hospital, it’s pretty obvious that he had sussed out early on that charity work would provide him with the perfect cover. It lent him a saint-like public persona that would gain him access to the kind of vulnerable youngsters he craved. It was a convenient means to an end. And I bet that when he set out on that path he could never have dreamed that institutions such as hospitals would unquestioningly hand those youngsters to him on a plate.

His charity work did not come out of the goodness of his heart. It was entirely the opposite, in fact.

But while the ashes of Savile’s long-term deception do need to be raked over, the vast majority of his crimes happened in the days before such laws as the Children Acts of 1989 and 2004, and the Human Rights Act 1998, and before there was greater public awareness of child abuse.

The laws are now in place to protect children in hospitals, in schools, at the BBC, and even in children’s homes, where more recently they should have been able to protect those vulnerable young girls in care abused by gangs of men. But it was the people supposedly caring for them who failed to put the law into practice.

When you add together the Children Act (the one that prevents parents taking photographs of their own children in public places and teachers cuddling a hurt child at school), parental fear of stranger danger and the isolated hours children are spending in front of their computers, children and adults are becoming increasingly alienated. We need to bring children and adults closer, not tear them further apart.

Comments(5)

Roger Francais says...
3:25pm Tue 23 Oct 12

Its all such a sorry state of affairs...

My sources tell me that Jeremy Beadle had a small hand in it too!

boblat says...
4:30pm Wed 24 Oct 12

People just don't realise the vast scale of abuse of children by a lot of the very people that are employed to keep them safe.
Many protective organisations are infiltrated by paedophiles who ''plan'' their work and ''work'' their plan. They are a manipulated, scheming and plotting individual intent only on their self satisfaction or monetary gain.
Instead of wasting millions of pounds and precious manpower on trying to establish what a DEAD nonce got up to when he was alive, there should be more emphasis put on digging out these evil parasites and putting them where they belong..

anubis says...
4:21pm Thu 25 Oct 12

The enormous publicity given to the Savile case -– and the critique being launched at the BBC for its inactivity whilst the culprit was still alive – should be contrasted with the MUCH GREATER scandal of the thousands (maybe millions?) of children abused by the Church, world-wide, and revealed by the Murphy report serves to highlight the double standards of our society.

The report slated church leaders for their scandalous disregard for the safety of children in Dublin and other dioceses. The conspiracy of silence was aided by the Irish state, in particular the gardai, who connived by refusing to investigate allegations and instead referred them to the local bishop. Priests were 'outside the law' - an unchallengeable elite operating according to their own rules.

This cover-up extended far beyond the Irish church - it was a conspiracy of silence orchestrated by the pope himself. The Vatican circulated a 1962 document called ‘Crimen sollicitationis’, which stated that any person who makes an allegation of abuse against a priest must take an oath of secrecy. Breach of that oath meant automatic excommunication. Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger - now pope Benedict - was in charge of the investigations into child sex abuse from 2001 to 2006. He wrote to all Catholic bishops in 200l, reminding them of the need to enforce ‘Crimen sollicitationis’ and demanding all complaints of abuse be referred to the Vatican -- NOT the police.

Maybe this will also be properly investigated -- when the Pope dies?

mictrix says...
10:24pm Thu 25 Oct 12

Roger Francais wrote:
Its all such a sorry state of affairs...

My sources tell me that Jeremy Beadle had a small hand in it too!
hahaha i heard he stuck his fingers up his old jackpot how very apt for brighton lol

Morpheus says...
10:53am Sat 27 Oct 12

I think you are wrong to make a critical comment about his charity work not coming from the goodness of his heart. People are complex for a start. But surely the important issue is that the money he raised came from the goodness in other people's hearts and they should not be made to feel guilty because of him.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree