Sport RSS Feed


Saqlain can't wait to bowl with Mushy

8:38am Thursday 1st March 2007

comment Comments (8)   Have your say »


Sussex fans are in for a treat this season, no matter how the county do in defence of the Championship and C&G Trophy.

At some stage - and the sooner the better as far as their supporters are concerned - they can look forward to the renewal of arguably world cricket's best spin-bowling partnership of the last 15 years.

Mushtaq Ahmed and Saqlain Mushtaq have not bowled in tandem since Pakistan played a Test match in Auckland in March 2001.

But Saqlain's arrival at Hove, initially as cover for his compatriot and, if all goes well, as his long-term replacement, means that unsuspecting county batsman will have to counter the twin threat of a leg spinner who has been domestic cricket's most successful bowler in the last four years and a rejuvenated finger-spinner who invented the 'doosra'.

And if Sussex supporters are savouring the prospect, then so is one half of the deadly duo charged with helping to bring more success to Hove in 2007.

There are so many parallels with Saqlain's arrival and Mushtaq's four years earlier that it would be tempting to predict he can make just as big an impact.

When Mushtaq arrived there were huge question marks over his fitness and whether he still had the old magic. Four years and 365 Championship wickets showed he had.

It's the same for Saqlain. In 2004, he had reconstructive surgery on knees worn out from bowling and his 2005 comeback with Surrey - the county he had helped win nine trophies between 1997-2004 - lasted just two games.

Last season he played in Ireland's C&G Trophy campaign with modest success - his four wickets cost 56.75 - although only twice in eight games was he able to bowl his full allocation of overs because Ireland were defending such flimsy totals.

Cricket is my life Like Mushtaq, rekindling his career clearly means a lot to him. "Before I got injured I used to tell people I will die twice," he said. "The first time when I have to stop cricket and the second time will be my natural death.

"It was depressing not playing regularly for three years - cricket is my life."

The pair have remained good friends since they first played for Pakistan together in 1997.

Saqlain visited Mushtaq last year and even had a net session with the Sussex squad and then when the county played Ireland, Chris Adams confirmed Sussex were keen to sign him.

There must still be some doubt as to how much cricket Saqlain's knees can take during a punishing domestic season which is why his two-year contract, like Mushtaq's was, is weighted heavily in favour of appearances and wickets. But he has worked hard on his fitness this winter and Sussex will try to manage him in the same careful way as they have Mushtaq.

But he will definitely start the season while Mushtaq and Rana Naved - the county's second overseas signing - complete World Cup duties with Pakistan.

By the time they return at the end of April, Saqlain should have received his English passport and will then be EU qualified, opening up the possibility of all three of them playing in the same side.

There is no questioning his pedigree. In 49 Tests, the last of which was in 2004, he has taken 208 wickets at 29.83 while his one-day record is even more impressive with 288 wickets at 21.78 in 169 matches. He was the first bowler to take an ODI hat-trick and was the quickest to 200 wickets. And, like Mushtaq, he is no mug with the bat either and has a Test hundred against New Zealand in 2001 to his name.

And he assures Sussex supporters that the famed doosra' - the ball bowled with an off-break action which spins into the right-hander - has been coming out nicely this winter.

Add in the well-disguised arm ball which has brought him considerable success down the years, including a hat-trick at Hove in 1997, and there is no doubt Saqlain has all the tricks.

Saqlain has no targets in terms of wickets. For him, an achievement would be to play a lot of cricket this season. If he does, the success will surely come.

Mushtaq remains a huge influence and if anyone is going to get the best out of Saqlain, in the same way as he has with Rana Naved, then it's him. How he would love to emulate his great friend and mentor.

"Great bowlers aren't finished when they are 32 so when Mushy got his fitness back it didn't surprise me that he did so well for Sussex," he said.

"He was still a world-class performer, people in the game knew that. When I was injured people kept telling me I was finished but I know I have a lot of good cricket left in me.

"Of course, I'd love to take 100 wickets, every bowler would. But I don't want to put myself under that much pressure. It will take time for me to get back to the standard I want but I am determined to do it.

"Sussex has given me this chance and I'm looking forward to it."

Send your welcome messages to Saqlain and tell us what do you think about his arrival at Hove


Your Say YourThe Argus

KEVIN, Worthing says...
7:57pm Mon 5 Mar 07

I don't quite understand all the hype that seems to be surrounding this signing.

I am happy to accept the signing as a long-term replacement for Mushtaq but even then I am not convinced he can become a reborn success like Mushtaq was.

And nobody seems to be commenting on what this might do to the likes of Tom Smith and Ollie Rayner?

It's all very well saying they can learn from such a great player but what first team appearances are they going to get now?

Finally, I'm not in favour of another kolpak signing. Goodwin was justifiable considering his loyalty but I would prefer if we tried to keep the squad english qualified in the conventional sense.

Martyn, Peacehaven says...
9:03pm Mon 5 Mar 07

Firstly, Saqlain is not another Kolpak signing as he is married to British women and therefore qualifies for British citizenship and could play for England in 2008.

Smith (19) and Rayner (21) are both very young and will learn from being around such great players. Spinners don't tend to come into their own until much later normally around their mid-twenties.

I also believe that with the lack of seamers coming through Smith and Rayner will get opportunities once Mushy retires.

The signing of Saqlain has been done with 2008 in mind. His signing now enables Sussex to sign Rana as the overseas player for 2008.

It would have been a huge task for either of them to fill the void left by Mushtaq.

KEVIN, Worthing says...
3:32pm Tue 6 Mar 07

Saqlain is only eligible as an EU player - whatever passport he may receive in the near future as he is neither an overseas player nor a conventional english one, as I stated.

So, by your argument, we tell Rayner and Smith that they should get more first team opportunities when Mushtaq retires, whenever, that may be?

Yes, I'm sure that will satisfy them. Not very forward-thinking in my view.

And you state that you believe they will get more opportunities because of the apparant lack of seamers available?
I don't think so.

Saqlain hasn't come to play in the seconds so are we saying that the likes of Luke Wright are likely to be pushed out to accomodate him?

I hope I am proved wrong but it is a big risk both in terms of his ability and fitness.

Martyn, says...
1:55pm Wed 7 Mar 07

There is no doubting Saqlain's ability as he has a proven track record. I would like to see them play more too but I don't believe they are ready for the first team yet.

Wright will get opprtuntities as Lewry, Kirtley and Martin-Jenkins approach the end of their careers.

Our attack will be very different in four or five years time when overseas seamer, Wright, Liddle, Smith and Rayner will probably make up our bowling attack.

If he improves his batting Wright will be competiting with Martin-Jenkins for a place this season.

From 2008 there will be only one overseas player. The signing of Saqlain indicates to me that this will probably be Mushtaq Ahmed last season with Sussex.

Saqlain will in April be British and will be eligible to play for England from 2008.

KEVIN, Worthing says...
7:46am Thu 8 Mar 07

You say there is no doubting Saqlain's ability? How can you quantify that at present?

If he was as good as he was then he would still be playing international cricket and probably county cricket in the past few years.

I accept the situation has similarities to when Mushtaq was signed, however, it is alot to expect a similar success story with Saqlain.

It simply doesn't always turn-up the simplistic way you believe, saying our attack will consist of the younger bowlers that we have now and that Wright will just slot into the side when the older bowlers retire!

Wright hasn't delivered consistently to warrant automatic four-day selection but if he is the fall guy to accomodate Saqlain for more than one season, we could risk losing a promising young english player that was signed to develop his potential.


Martyn, Peacehaven says...
7:27pm Thu 8 Mar 07

It is up to Robinson to ensure what you say in the last paragraph doesn't happen. I think the fall gall maybe Hopkinson. As we now have eleven capped players who will all want to play.

I think this could certainly be Mushtaq's and possibly Montgomerie and Lewry's last season.

I hope that when these players retire Robinson shows faith in the likes of Hopkinson, Nash and Wright instead of importing players in.

When Mushtaq was signed people questioning his signing and I see a lot of similarities between the two. If anything Saqlain is a better bet because he is younger.

KEVIN, Worthing says...
10:59am Mon 12 Mar 07

Yes and despite my views, I do trust the management to have made the signing on the basis of good judgement.

If Hopkinson is the fall guy who will open the innings? Yardy doesn't want to, neither does Goodwin. That only leaves Nash - if he warrants a place as the only realistic candidate.

It will definitely be Montgmomories's last season as he was only given a on year extension and has this teaching post lined-up so we need to resolve this too otherwise we could have problems next season. That's why failure to recruit Maddy was a blow.

Martyn, says...
1:42pm Mon 12 Mar 07

With regards to Montgomerie I presume the teching post you are referring to is at Brighton College. I have it good authority that he would like to play for another two seasons. Although I hope you are right that this is his last season as we need to bring Nash through.

As for openers I think it should be Montgomerie and Goodwin. They had a hugely successful opening partnership between 2001 and 2003. Goodwin averages 54 as an opener for Sussex compared with 52 at #4. Montgomerie averages 43 with Goodwin as opener compared with 32 with Ward/Hopkinson. I wouldn't move Yardy from number 3.

I wasn't disappointed that we failed to sign Maddy as he averaged only 27 last year in the second division of the county championship.

We also need to start bringing through the likes of Hopkinson, Nash and Wright. If this season turns out to be Montgomerie, Lewry and Mushtaq last season hopefully this will happen.

I think Nash and Hopkinson will be the openers in 2008.

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »